23121Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 16 June 2022.#IG v Varhoven administrativen sad.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Effective judicial protection – National procedural rule providing that an action seeking to dispute the compatibility of a national provision with EU law is devoid of purpose where the provision is repealed in the course of proceedings.#Case C-289/21.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23123Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 June 2022.#X v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad voor Vreemdelingenbetwistingen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Article 2(f) – Article 10(3)(a) – Concept of ‘unaccompanied minor’ – Right to family reunification – Refugee minor who is married at the time of her entry into the territory of a Member State – Child marriage not recognised in that Member State – Cohabitation with the spouse lawfully residing in that Member State.#Case C-230/21.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23124Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 16 June 2022.#Harman International Industries, Inc. v AB SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 34 and 36 TFEU – Free movement of goods – Intellectual property – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 15 – Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark – Placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Place of first marketing of products by the proprietor of the trade mark or with its consent – Proof – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Effective judicial protection – Operative part of judicial decisions not identifying the products covered – Difficulties in implementation – Restricted scope of action before the competent court for enforcement – Fair trial – Rights of the defence – Principle of the equality of arms.#Case C-175/21.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23125Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 June 2022.#Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament.#Appeal – Institutional law – Members of the European Parliament – Loss of eligibility following a criminal conviction – Declaration that the seat of a Member of the European Parliament is vacant – Request to take an initiative as a matter of urgency to assert the immunity of a Member of the European Parliament – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility.#Case C-115/21 P.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23126Case C-376/21: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — Zamestnik-ministar na regionalnoto razvitie i blagoustroystvoto i rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Regioni v rastezh’ 2014-2020 v Obshtina Razlog (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 — Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 — Inapplicability to public contracts awarded by Member States and financed by resources from the European Structural and Investment Funds — Directive 2014/24/EU — Direct and unconditional reference to provisions of EU law in national legislation — Applicability to a contract whose estimated value is lower than the threshold set in the directive — Article 32(2)(a) — Option for a contracting authority to invite only one economic operator to participate in a negotiated procedure without prior publication after deeming a prior open procedure unsuccessful — Obligation to maintain the initial conditions of the contract without introducing substantial alterations)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23127Case C-229/21: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Port de Bruxelles, Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v Infrabel SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Trans-European transport network — Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 — Article 15(1) — Inland waterways transport infrastructures — Inland ports — Obligation of a Member State to connect inland ports with road or rail transport infrastructures — Removal of the connection with one of those two types of transport infrastructure — Conditions)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23128Joined Cases C-65/21 P and C-73/21 P to C-75/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022 — SGL Carbon SE (C-65/21 P), Química del Nalón SA, formerly Industrial Química del Nalón SA (C-73/21 P), Deza a.s. (C-74/21 P), Bilbaína de Alquitranes SA (C-75/21 P) v European Commission, Kingdom of Spain, European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (Appeals — Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Classification, labelling and packaging of certain substances and mixtures — Regulation (EU) No 944/2013 — Classification of pitch, coal tar, high-temp as an Aquatic Acute 1 (H400) toxic substance and as an Aquatic Chronic 1 (H410) toxic substance — Annulment — Actions for damages)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23129Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark tagesschau – Partial revocation – Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-83/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23130Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark tagesschau – Partial revocation – Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant – Inadmissibility.#Case T-83/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23131Case T-83/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark tagesschau — Partial revocation — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23132Opinion of the Court of 16 June 2022.#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU (Modernised Energy Charter Treaty).#Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU – Request for an Opinion – Draft modernised Energy Charter Treaty – Article 26 – Dispute settlement mechanism – Admissibility.#Case Avis 1/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23133Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#DuoDecad Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 2, 24 and 43 – Place of supply of services – Technical support services provided to a company established in another Member State – Abuse of rights – Assessment of the facts – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-596/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23134Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#DuoDecad Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Articles 2, 24 and 43 – Place of supply of services – Technical support services provided to a company established in another Member State – Abuse of rights – Assessment of the facts – Lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-596/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23135Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Proceedings brought by A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 2 – Scope – Article 13(2) – Regulated professions – Right to take up the profession of psychotherapist in a Member State based on a diploma in psychotherapy awarded by a university established in another Member State – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU – Freedom of movement and establishment – Assessment of the equivalence of training – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation among Member States – Doubts of the host Member State as to the level of knowledge and qualifications that can be presumed from a diploma awarded in another Member State – Conditions.#Case C-577/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23136Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#Proceedings brought by A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recognition of professional qualifications – Directive 2005/36/EC – Article 2 – Scope – Article 13(2) – Regulated professions – Conditions for pursuing the profession of psychotherapist in a Member State on the basis of a diploma in psychotherapy issued by a university established in another Member State – Articles 45 and 49 TFEU – Freedom of movement and freedom of establishment – Assessment of the equivalence of the relevant training – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation between Member States – Conditions on the basis of which the host Member State may challenge the level of knowledge and qualifications attested to by a diploma issued in another Member State.#Case C-577/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23137Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#ACC Silicones Ltd. v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Dividends from ‘free-float’ shares – Reimbursement of tax on income from capital paid by a non-resident company – Conditions – Free movement of capital – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-572/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23138Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#ACC Silicones Ltd. v Bundeszentralamt für Steuern.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Dividends from ‘free-float’ shares – Reimbursement of tax on income from capital paid by a non-resident company – Conditions – Free movement of capital – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-572/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23139Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#DB and LY v Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsia na Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) – Decision 2007/533/JHA – Articles 38 and 39 – Alert on an object sought – Objectives of the alert – Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings – Execution – Measures to be taken and action based on an alert – Surrender of the object seized to the Member State issuing the alert – National legislation not permitting a refusal to execute the alert.#Case C-520/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022
23140Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 June 2022.#DB and LY v Nachalnik na Rayonno upravlenie Silistra pri Oblastna direktsia na Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad – Silistra.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) – Decision 2007/533/JHA – Articles 38 and 39 – Alert on an object sought – Objectives of the alert – Seizure or use as evidence in criminal proceedings – Execution – Measures to be taken and action based on an alert – Surrender of the object seized to the Member State issuing the alert – National legislation not permitting a refusal to execute the alert.#Case C-520/20.cjeu_case · 16 juin 2022