Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23041

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 June 2022.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework – No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-657/20.

cjeu_case ·
23042

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Munich, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – No aesthetic complementarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rights of the defence.#Case T-502/20.

cjeu_case ·
23043

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Munich, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – No aesthetic complementarity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rights of the defence.#Case T-502/20.

cjeu_case ·
23045

Case T-657/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Ryanair v Commission (Finnair II; Covid-19) (State aid — Finnish air-transport market — Aid granted by Finland to Finnair in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — Recapitalisation of an airline by its public and private shareholders on a pro rata basis in proportion to the previously existing ownership structure — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Derogation from certain requirements of the temporary framework — No weighing of the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
23046

Case T-502/20: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — Munich v EUIPO — Tone Watch (MUNICH10A.T.M.) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — European Union word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. — Earlier EU and national figurative marks MUNICH — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods and services — No aesthetic complementarity — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — No damage to reputation — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Rights of the defence)

cjeu_case ·
23047

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#European Commission v Slovak Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 6(2) and (3) – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 2009/147/EC – Article 4(1) – Conservation of wild birds – Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) – Forest management strategies – Emergency felling – Appropriate assessment of their implications – Natura 2000 sites – Special protection areas designated for the conservation of the capercaillie – Absence of measures to prevent the deterioration of habitats and of special conservation measures in certain areas.#Case C-661/20.

cjeu_case ·
23048

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#European Commission v Slovak Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Directive 92/43/EEC – Article 6(2) and (3) – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 2009/147/EC – Article 4(1) – Conservation of wild birds – Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) – Forest management strategies – Emergency felling – Appropriate assessment of their implications – Natura 2000 sites – Special protection areas designated for the conservation of the capercaillie – Absence of measures to prevent the deterioration of habitats and of special conservation measures in certain areas.#Case C-661/20.

cjeu_case ·
23049

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.

cjeu_case ·
23050

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Leistritz AG v LH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Second sentence of Article 38(3) – Data protection officer – Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks – Legal basis – Article 16 TFEU – Requirement of functional independence – National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause.#Case C-534/20.

cjeu_case ·
23051

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#AB Volvo and DAF Trucks NV v RM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Directive 2014/104/EU – Articles 10, 17 and 22 – Actions for damages for infringements of the provisions of EU competition law – Limitation period – Rebuttable presumption of harm – Quantification of harm suffered – Late transposition of the directive – Temporal application – Substantive and procedural provisions.#Case C-267/20.

cjeu_case ·
23052

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#AB Volvo and DAF Trucks NV v RM.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial - León.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Article 101 TFEU – Directive 2014/104/EU – Articles 10, 17 and 22 – Actions for damages for infringements of the provisions of EU competition law – Limitation period – Rebuttable presumption of harm – Quantification of harm suffered – Late transposition of the directive – Temporal application – Substantive and procedural provisions.#Case C-267/20.

cjeu_case ·
23053

Case C-661/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2022 — European Commission v Slovak Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(2) and (3) — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 2009/147/EC — Article 4(1) — Conservation of wild birds — Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) — Forest management strategies — Emergency felling — Appropriate assessment of their implications — Natura 2000 sites — Special protection areas designated for the conservation of the capercaillie — Absence of measures to prevent the deterioration of habitats and of special conservation measures in certain areas)

cjeu_case ·
23054

Case C-534/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht — Germany) — Leistritz AG v LH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Second sentence of Article 38(3) — Data protection officer — Prohibition of the dismissal, by a controller or processor, of a data protection officer or of the imposition, by a controller or processor, of a penalty on him or her for performing his or her tasks — Legal basis — Article 16 TFEU — Requirement of functional independence — National legislation prohibiting the termination of a data protection officer’s employment contract without just cause)

cjeu_case ·
23055

Case C-267/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial — León — Spain) — AB Volvo, DAF TRUCKS NV v RM (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101 TFEU — Directive 2014/104/EU — Articles 10, 17 and 22 — Actions for damages for infringements of the provisions of EU competition law — Limitation period — Rebuttable presumption of harm — Quantification of harm suffered — Belated transposition of the directive — Temporal application — Substantive and procedural provisions)

cjeu_case ·
23056

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 June 2022.#Anglo Austrian AAB AG, formerly Anglo Austrian AAB Bank AG and Belegging-Maatschappij 'Far-East' BV v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Serious breach of the national provisions transposing Directive 2005/60/EC – Proportionality – Infringement of the national legislation on the governance of credit institutions – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-797/19.

cjeu_case ·
23057

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 June 2022.#Anglo Austrian AAB AG, formerly Anglo Austrian AAB Bank AG and Belegging-Maatschappij 'Far-East' BV v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Serious breach of the national provisions transposing Directive 2005/60/EC – Proportionality – Infringement of the national legislation on the governance of credit institutions – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-797/19.

cjeu_case ·
23060

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2022.#Italian Republic v European Commission.#ERDF – Regional policy – Operational programmes coming under the ‘Investment for growth and jobs’ objective in Italy – Decision approving the financial contribution of the ERDF to the major project ‘Major National Project Ultra Broadband – White Areas’ – Ineligibility of the costs incurred by the beneficiary in respect of value added tax (VAT) – Article 69(3)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Concept of ‘VAT that is recoverable under national VAT legislation’.#Case T-357/19.

cjeu_case ·