Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
23005

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 June 2022.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich v K.S. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Birth certificate issued by the Member State of birth of the child and designating two mothers in respect of that child – Refusal by the Member State of origin of one of those two mothers to transcribe that birth certificate into the national register of civil status – Transcription of that certificate being a prerequisite for the issuing of identity documents – National legislation of that Member State of origin not recognising the parenthood of persons of the same sex.#Case C-2/21.

cjeu_case ·
23006

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 June 2022.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich v K.S. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Birth certificate issued by the Member State of birth of the child and designating two mothers in respect of that child – Refusal by the Member State of origin of one of those two mothers to transcribe that birth certificate into the national register of civil status – Transcription of that certificate being a prerequisite for the issuing of identity documents – National legislation of that Member State of origin not recognising the parenthood of persons of the same sex.#Case C-2/21.

cjeu_case ·
23007

Case C-2/21: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 June 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Krakowie — Poland) — Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Citizenship of the Union — Articles 20 and 21 TFEU — Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States — Birth certificate issued by the Member State of birth of the child and designating two mothers in respect of that child — Refusal by the Member State of origin of one of those two mothers to transcribe that birth certificate into the national register of civil status — Transcription of that certificate being a prerequisite for the issuing of identity documents — National legislation of that Member State of origin not recognising the parenthood of persons of the same sex)

cjeu_case ·
23009

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-154/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23010

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-154/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23011

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-153/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23012

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-153/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23013

Order of the Court (Court determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-152/22 P.

cjeu_case ·
23014

Order of the Court (Court determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 June 2022.#Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-152/22 P.

cjeu_case ·