Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
2281

Case T-246/25: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 – Ella Hotels and Resorts v EUIPO – Hachette Filipacchi Presse (ELLA RESORTS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ELLA RESORTS – Earlier EU figurative mark ELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to repute – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark – Lack of due cause)

cjeu_case ·
2282

Case T-245/25: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 – Ella Hotels and Resorts v EUIPO Hachette Filipacchi Presse (ELLA HOTELS AND RESORTS) (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ELLA HOTELS AND RESORTS – Earlier EU figurative mark ELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to repute – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark – Lack of due cause)

cjeu_case ·
2284

Case T-177/25, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Gdańsku: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 28 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny – Poland) – C. sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Gdańsku (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Import and export procedures – Tariff quotas – Exhaustion of the quota on the first day of its opening – No quota number integrated into the TARIC code – Subsequent amendment of the customs declaration in order to benefit from inclusion in the quota – Concept of amendment [permitting] the declarant to comply with his or her obligations relating to the placing of the goods under the customs procedure concerned – Article 173(3) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013)

cjeu_case ·
2287

Case T-54/25: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 – Maschio Gaspardo v EUIPO – Madara Agro (Agricultural machines) (European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing an agricultural subsoiler – Grounds for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Informed user – Degree of freedom of the designer – No different overall impression)

cjeu_case ·
2289

Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 28 January 2026.#Accorinvest and Société générale v Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Other indirect taxes on excise goods – Article 1(2) of Directive 2008/118/EC – Concept of ‘other indirect tax’ – Tariff-based contribution on electricity transmission and distribution services – Passing on the tax to the consumer – Direct and inseverable link between the tax and the consumption of electricity.#Case T-653/24.

cjeu_case ·
2290

Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 28 January 2026.#Accorinvest and Société générale v Ministre de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Other indirect taxes on excise goods – Article 1(2) of Directive 2008/118/EC – Concept of ‘other indirect tax’ – Tariff-based contribution on electricity transmission and distribution services – Passing on the tax to the consumer – Direct and inseverable link between the tax and the consumption of electricity.#Case T-653/24.

cjeu_case ·
2291

Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 28 janvier 2026.#LU contre Banque européenne d'investissement.#Fonction publique – Personnel de la BEI – Harcèlement moral – Enquête administrative – Demande d’assistance – Rejet de la demande – Décision d’engager une procédure disciplinaire – Recours en annulation – Acte non susceptible de recours – Acte préparatoire – Recevabilité – Obligation de motivation – Erreur d’appréciation – Responsabilité.#Affaire T-365/24.

cjeu_case ·
2292

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Psychological harassment – Administrative inquiry – Request for assistance – Rejection of the request – Decision to initiate disciplinary proceedings – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Preparatory act – Admissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-365/24.

cjeu_case ·
2293

Case T-653/24, Accorinvest: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 28 January 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État – France) – Accorinvest and Société générale v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Other indirect taxes on excise goods – Article 1(2) of Directive 2008/118/EC – Concept of other indirect tax – Tariff-based contribution on electricity transmission and distribution services – Passing on the tax to the consumer – Direct and inseverable link between the tax and the consumption of electricity)

cjeu_case ·
2295

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

cjeu_case ·
2296

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

cjeu_case ·
2297

Case T-1052/23: Judgment of the General Court of 28 January 2026 – UH v Commission (Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity)

cjeu_case ·