Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
22101

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 8 September 2022.#Gallaher Limited v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Direct taxation – Corporate income tax – Articles 49, 63 and 64 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Free movement of capital – Disposal of assets within a group of companies – Company resident for tax purposes in one Member State having a parent company resident for tax purposes in another Member State and a sister company resident for tax purposes in a third country – Disposal of intellectual property rights of the company resident for tax purposes in a Member State to its sister company resident for tax purposes in a third country – Disposal by the company resident for tax purposes in a Member State of shares in one of its subsidiaries to its parent company resident for tax purposes in another Member State – Consideration equal to the market value of the assets transferred – Exemption from tax or imposition of tax depending on the State in which the beneficiary company has its seat.#Case C-707/20.

cjeu_case ·
22102

Case C-716/20: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — RTL Television GmbH v Grupo Pestana S.G.P.S., S.A., SALVOR — Sociedade de Investimento Hoteleiro, S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Satellite broadcasting and cable retransmission — Directive 93/83/EEC — Article 1(3) — Concept of ‘cable retransmission’ — Provider of the retransmission not having the status of a cable operator — Simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged distribution of television and radio programmes broadcast by satellite and intended for reception by the public, performed by the operator of a hotel establishment, by means of a satellite dish, a cable and television or radio sets — None)

cjeu_case ·
22103

Case C-659/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — ET v Ministerstvo životního prostředí (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein — Regulation (EC) No 338/97 — Article 8(3)(d) — Concept of ‘specimens of animal species that are born and bred in captivity’ — Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 — Article 1(3) — Concept of ‘breeding stock’ — Article 54(2) — Establishment of the breeding stock — Controlled ancestry)

cjeu_case ·
22104

Case C-614/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallina Halduskohus — Estonia) — Lux Express Estonia AS v Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Imposition by means of general rules of an obligation to carry certain categories of passenger free of charge — Obligation for the competent authority to grant public service compensation to operators — Calculation method)

cjeu_case ·
22105

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against serious human rights violations and abuses – Grounds of the decisions mentioning the applicant’s name as the financier of the Wagner Group – Assessments made in the grounds of the decisions – Acts not open to appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-75/22.

cjeu_case ·
22106

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Yevgeniy Viktorovich Prigozhin v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against serious human rights violations and abuses – Grounds of the decisions mentioning the applicant’s name as the financier of the Wagner Group – Assessments made in the grounds of the decisions – Acts not open to appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-75/22.

cjeu_case ·
22108

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-9/22.

cjeu_case ·
22109

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Olimp Laboratories sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Application for the European Union word mark VITA-MIN MULTIPLE SPORT – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-9/22.

cjeu_case ·
22118

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Sławomir Łosowski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark KOMBI – Earlier EU word mark kombii – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Reliance on an individual right to use the name ‘kombi’ under national law.#Case T-730/21.

cjeu_case ·
22119

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2022.#Sławomir Łosowski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark KOMBI – Earlier EU word mark kombii – Relative ground for invalidity – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Reliance on an individual right to use the name ‘kombi’ under national law.#Case T-730/21.

cjeu_case ·