22061Case C-587/22: Action brought on 8 September 2022 — European Commission v Hungarycjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22062Case C-188/22: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu — Poland) — VP (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 — Taking of evidence — Written evidence of a person residing in a Member State other than the Member State of the court having jurisdiction — Possibility of having recourse to the means of taking evidence provided for by national law and not to that provided for by that regulation)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22063Case C-56/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — PL v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22064Case T-625/21: Order of the General Court of 8 September 2022 — Automobiles Citroën v EUIPO — Polestar (Device of two inverted chevrons)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22065Case T-608/21: Order of the General Court of 8 September 2022 — Automobiles Citroën v EUIPO Polestar (Device of two inverted chevrons)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22066Case T-474/21: Order of the General Court of 8 September 2022 — Schenk Italia v EUIPO — Consorzio per la tutela dei vini Valpolicella (AMICONE)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22067Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Puma SE and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam – Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C‑659/13 and C‑34/14 – Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Competence ratione temporis – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case C-507/21 P.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22068Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Puma SE and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam – Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C‑659/13 and C‑34/14 – Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Competence ratione temporis – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case C-507/21 P.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22069Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#IRnova AB v FLIR Systems AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction over the registration or validity of patents – Scope – Patent application deposited and patent granted in a third State – Status of inventor – Proprietor of the right to an invention.#Case C-399/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22070Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#IRnova AB v FLIR Systems AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 24(4) – Exclusive jurisdiction – Jurisdiction over the registration or validity of patents – Scope – Patent application deposited and patent granted in a third State – Status of inventor – Proprietor of the right to an invention.#Case C-399/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22071Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#R.T. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Place where the customs debt is incurred – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30 – Article 60 – Article 71(1) – Chargeable event and place where the import VAT becomes chargeable – Place where the tax liability is incurred – Finding of a failure to comply with an obligation imposed by EU customs legislation – Determination of the place of importation of goods – Means of transport registered in a third country and imported into the European Union in infringement of customs legislation.#Case C-368/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22072Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#R.T. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Place where the customs debt is incurred – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30 – Article 60 – Article 71(1) – Chargeable event and place where the import VAT becomes chargeable – Place where the tax liability is incurred – Finding of a failure to comply with an obligation imposed by EU customs legislation – Determination of the place of importation of goods – Means of transport registered in a third country and imported into the European Union in infringement of customs legislation.#Case C-368/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22073Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Asociación Multisectorial de Empresas de la Electrónica, las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, de las Telecomunicaciones y de los contenidos Digitales (AMETIC) v Administración General del Estado and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 5(2)(b) – Exclusive reproduction right – Exception – Copies for private use – Levy – Ex ante exemption – Exemption certificate issued by a private law entity controlled solely by copyright management societies – Powers of review of that entity.#Case C-263/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22074Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Asociación Multisectorial de Empresas de la Electrónica, las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, de las Telecomunicaciones y de los contenidos Digitales (AMETIC) v Administración General del Estado and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 5(2)(b) – Exclusive reproduction right – Exception – Copies for private use – Levy – Ex ante exemption – Exemption certificate issued by a private law entity controlled solely by copyright management societies – Powers of review of that entity.#Case C-263/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22075Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Finanzamt R v W-GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1), Article 9(1), Article 167 and Article 168(a) – Deduction of input tax – Definition of ‘taxable person’ – Holding company – Expenditure linked to a shareholder contribution in kind to its subsidiaries – No contribution of expenditure to the general costs – Subsidiaries’ activities largely tax-exempt.#Case C-98/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22076Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#Finanzamt R v W-GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1), Article 9(1), Article 167 and Article 168(a) – Deduction of input tax – Definition of ‘taxable person’ – Holding company – Expenditure linked to a shareholder contribution in kind to its subsidiaries – No contribution of expenditure to the general costs – Subsidiaries’ activities largely tax-exempt.#Case C-98/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22077Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#E.K. and Others v D.B.P. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Articles 6(1) and 7(1) – Mortgage credit agreements – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Limitation period – Principle of effectiveness.#Joined Cases C-80/21 to C-82/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22078Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#E.K. and Others v D.B.P. and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy - Śródmieścia w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Articles 6(1) and 7(1) – Mortgage credit agreements – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Limitation period – Principle of effectiveness.#Joined Cases C-80/21 to C-82/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22079Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 8 September 2022.#Monz Handelsgesellschaft lnternational mbH & Co. KG v Büchel GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugtechnik KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Design – Directive 98/71/EC – Article 3(3) and (4) – Conditions for obtaining protection for a component part of a complex product – Concepts of ‘visibility’ and ‘normal use’ – Visibility of a component part of a complex product during normal use of that product by the end user.#Case C-472/21.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22080Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 8 September 2022.###cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.