22041Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.#Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-130/22.cjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22042Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 September 2022.#Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL – Earlier EU word mark Traumeel – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-130/22.cjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22043Case T-570/22: Action brought on 12 September 2022 — Herbert Smith Freehills v Commissioncjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22044Case T-130/22: Order of the General Court of 12 September 2022 — Biologische Heilmittel Heel v EUIPO — Esi (TRAUMGEL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark TRAUMGEL — Earlier EU word mark Traumeel — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22045Case C-593/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Cluj (Romania) lodged on 12 September 2022 — FS and WU v First Bank SAcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22046Case C-592/22 P: Appeal brought on 12 September 2022 by Luís Miguel Novais against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 4 July 2022 in Case T-287/22, Novais v Portugalcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22047Case C-591/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 12 September 2022 — L. VOF v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteitcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22048Case C-214/22: Order of the President of the Court of 12 September 2022 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourgcjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22049Case C-191/22: Order of the President of the Court of 12 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — ME v État belgecjeu_case · 12 сентября 2022 г.
22050Case T-562/22: Action brought on 9 September 2022 — Noah Clothing v EUIPO — Noah (NOAH)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2022 г.
22051Case T-561/22: Action brought on 9 September 2022 — CFA Institute v EUIPO — Global Chartered Controller Institute (CCA Chartered Controller Analyst CERTIFICATE)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2022 г.
22052Case T-557/22: Action brought on 9 September 2022 — Chmielarz v EUIPO — Granulat (granulat)cjeu_case · 9 сентября 2022 г.
22053Case T-555/22: Action brought on 9 September 2022 — France v Commissioncjeu_case · 9 сентября 2022 г.
22054Case C-590/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Wesel (Germany) lodged on 9 September 2022 — AT, BT v PS GbR, VG, MB, DH, WB, GScjeu_case · 9 сентября 2022 г.
22055Case C-789/21: Order of the President of the Court of 9 September 2022 — European Commission v Republic of Bulgariacjeu_case · 9 сентября 2022 г.
22056Case T-556/22: Action brought on 8 September 2022 — House Foods Group v CPVO (SK20)cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22057Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#VP v KS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 – Taking of evidence – Written evidence of a person residing in a Member State other than the Member State of the court having jurisdiction – Possibility of having recourse to the means of taking evidence provided for by national law and not to that provided for by that regulation.#Case C-188/22.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22058Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#VP v KS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 – Taking of evidence – Written evidence of a person residing in a Member State other than the Member State of the court having jurisdiction – Possibility of having recourse to the means of taking evidence provided for by national law and not to that provided for by that regulation.#Case C-188/22.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22059Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#PL v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-56/22.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.
22060Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022.#PL v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-56/22.cjeu_case · 8 сентября 2022 г.