21961Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Primagra a.s. and Mlékárna Hlinsko a.s. v European Commission.#Actions for annulment – European Structural and Investment Funds – ERDF – Cohesion Fund – ESF – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – Letter concerning the follow-up of recommendations set out by the Commission in its audit of alleged conflicts of interest – Act not amenable to review – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility.#Joined Cases T-101/21 and T-213/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21962Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Protectoplus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Li-SAFE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application.#Case T-795/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21963Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Protectoplus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Li-SAFE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application.#Case T-795/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21964Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Refractory Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark e-tech – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-737/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21965Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Refractory Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark e-tech – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-737/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21966Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Okan Balaban v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Stahlwerkstatt – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-706/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21967Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Okan Balaban v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Stahlwerkstatt – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-706/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21968Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Okan Balaban v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark STAHLWERK – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-705/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21969Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Okan Balaban v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark STAHLWERK – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-705/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21970Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Task Food s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ENERGY CAKE – Declaration of invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/2011).#Case T-686/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21971Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Task Food s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ENERGY CAKE – Declaration of invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/2011).#Case T-686/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21972Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark STEAM – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, heading (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-609/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21973Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Privatbrauerei Eichbaum GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark STEAM – Genuine use of the mark – Nature of use – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, heading (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-609/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21974Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Blueroots Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-607/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21975Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Blueroots Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-607/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21976Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Lotion LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark BLACK IRISH – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-498/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21977Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Lotion LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark BLACK IRISH – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-498/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21978Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Sebastiano Gioioso v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MARE GIOIOSO di Sebastiano IMPORT EXPORT – Earlier national figurative mark GIOIA DI MARE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-423/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21979Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Sebastiano Gioioso v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark MARE GIOIOSO di Sebastiano IMPORT EXPORT – Earlier national figurative mark GIOIA DI MARE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-423/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.
21980Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.#Itinerant Show Room Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ITINERANT – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a singing duck in a circle – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity – Repute – Link – Unfair advantage – No due cause – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Document produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Inadmissibility.#Case T-417/21.cjeu_case · 14 сентября 2022 г.