Legal documents catalogue (cjeu_case)

104,314 documents
21864

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 September 2022.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of State aid – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration – Absolute impossibility of implementation – Limitation period – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-95/21.

cjeu_case ·
21865

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 September 2022.#Portuguese Republic v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of State aid – Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Principle of sound administration – Absolute impossibility of implementation – Limitation – Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589.#Case T-95/21.

cjeu_case ·
21869

Case T-95/21: Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2022 — Portugal v Commission (Madeira Free Zone) (State aid — Madeira Free Zone — Aid scheme implemented by Portugal — Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme — Concept of State aid — Existing aid within the meaning of Article 1(b)(i) and (ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 — Recovery — Legitimate expectations — Legal certainty — Principle of sound administration — Absolute impossibility of implementation — Limitation — Article 17 of Regulation 2015/1589)

cjeu_case ·
21870

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2022.#DA and Others v Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (Romatsa) and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral Investment Treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Arbitral award granting payment of damages – European Commission decision declaring that payment to be State aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Enforcement of an arbitral award before a court of a Member State other than the Member State to which the decision is addressed – Infringement of EU law – Article 19 TEU – Articles 267 and 344 TFEU – Autonomy of EU law.#Case C-333/19.

cjeu_case ·
21871

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2022.#DA and Others v Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (Romatsa) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Articles 107 and 108 TFEU – Bilateral Investment Treaty – Arbitration clause – Romania – Arbitral award granting payment of damages – European Commission decision declaring that payment to be State aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Enforcement of an arbitral award before a court of a Member State other than the Member State to which the decision is addressed – Infringement of EU law – Article 19 TEU – Articles 267 and 344 TFEU – Autonomy of EU law.#Case C-333/19.

cjeu_case ·
21872

Case C-333/19: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — DA v Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (Romatsa) and Others and FC and Others v Romanian Air Traffic Services Administration (Romatsa) and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Articles 107 and 108 TFEU — Bilateral Investment Treaty — Arbitration clause — Romania — Arbitral award granting payment of damages — European Commission decision declaring that payment to be State aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Enforcement of an arbitral award before a court of a Member State other than the Member State to which the decision is addressed — Infringement of EU law — Article 19 TEU — Articles 267 and 344 TFEU — Autonomy of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
21875

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 20 September 2022.#Meta Platforms Inc and Others v Bundeskartellamt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Social networks – Abuse of a dominant position by the operator of such a network – Abuse which entails the processing of the personal data of the users of that network as provided for in its general terms of use – Powers of a competition authority of a Member State to find that processing is not consistent with that regulation – Reconciliation with the powers of the national data protection supervisory authorities – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Points (a) to (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) of Regulation 2016/679 – Whether the processing is lawful – Article 9(1) and (2) – Processing of special categories of personal data – Article 4(11) – Concept of ‘consent’.#Case C-252/21.

cjeu_case ·
21876

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022.#Criminal proceedings against VD bd] Criminal proceedings against VD and SR.#References for a preliminary ruling – Single market for financial services – Market abuse – Insider dealing – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 12(2)(a) and (d) – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 23(2)(g) and (h) – Supervisory and investigatory powers of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) – General interest objective seeking to protect the integrity of financial markets in the European Union and public confidence in financial instruments – Option open to the AMF to require the traffic data records held by an operator providing electronic communications services – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Confidentiality of the communications – Restrictions – Legislation providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic data by operators providing electronic communications services – Option for a national court to restrict the temporal effects of a declaration of invalidity in respect of provisions of national law that are incompatible with EU law – Precluded.#Joined Cases C-339/20 and C-397/20.

cjeu_case ·
21877

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022.#Criminal proceedings against VD bd]
 
 Criminal proceedings against VD and SR.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#References for a preliminary ruling – Single market for financial services – Market abuse – Insider dealing – Directive 2003/6/EC – Article 12(2)(a) and (d) – Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 – Article 23(2)(g) and (h) – Supervisory and investigatory powers of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) – General interest objective seeking to protect the integrity of financial markets in the European Union and public confidence in financial instruments – Option open to the AMF to require the traffic data records held by an operator providing electronic communications services – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Confidentiality of the communications – Restrictions – Legislation providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic data by operators providing electronic communications services – Option for a national court to restrict the temporal effects of a declaration of invalidity in respect of provisions of national law that are incompatible with EU law – Precluded.#Joined Cases C-339/20 and C-397/20.

cjeu_case ·
21878

Joined Cases C-339/20 and C-397/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Criminal proceedings against VD (C-339/20), SR (C-397/20) (References for a preliminary ruling — Single Market for financial services — Market abuse — Insider dealing — Directive 2003/6/EC — Article 12(2)(a) and (d) — Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 — Article 23(2)(g) and (h) — Supervisory and investigatory powers of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) — General interest objective seeking to protect the integrity of financial markets in the European Union and public confidence in financial instruments — Option open to the AMF to require the traffic data records held by an operator providing electronic communications services — Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector — Directive 2002/58/EC — Article 15(1) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) — Confidentiality of communications — Restrictions — Legislation providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of traffic data by operators providing electronic communications services — Option for a national court to restrict the temporal effects of a declaration of invalidity in respect of provisions of national law that are incompatible with EU law — Precluded)

cjeu_case ·
21879

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SpaceNet AG and Telekom Deutschland GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Article 4(2) TEU.#Joined Cases C-793/19 and C-794/19.

cjeu_case ·
21880

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 September 2022.#Bundesrepublik Deutschland v SpaceNet AG and Telekom Deutschland GmbH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – General and indiscriminate retention of traffic and location data – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 6, 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – Article 4(2) TEU.#Joined Cases C-793/19 and C-794/19.

cjeu_case ·