21741Case C-597/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Polskie Linie Lotnicze ‘LOT’ S.A. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 16 — Compensation and assistance to passengers — Task of the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation — National legislation conferring on that body the power to order an air carrier to pay compensation due to a passenger — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to seek remedy before a tribunal)cjeu_case · 29 сентября 2022 г.
21742Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 28 September 2022.#Miroslav Labaš v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-58/22.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21743Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 28 September 2022.#Miroslav Labaš v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-58/22.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21744Case T-58/22: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2022 — Labaš v EUIPO (FRESH) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21745Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 28 septembre 2022.#Laboratorios Ern SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-342/22 P.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21746Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-342/22 P.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21747Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-320/22 P.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21748Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-320/22 P.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21749Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Tanja Zegers v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Transfer of national pension rights – Condition requiring acquisition before entry into the service of the European Union – Recognition by the national authority of a period after entry into the service of the European Union.#Case T-663/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21750Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Tanja Zegers v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Transfer of national pension rights – Condition requiring acquisition before entry into the service of the European Union – Recognition by the national authority of a period after entry into the service of the European Union.#Case T-663/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21751Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark COPAL TREE – Earlier national figurative mark COMPAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-572/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21752Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark COPAL TREE – Earlier national figurative mark COMPAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-572/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21753Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Vladimir Grieger v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Secondment – Commitment to reassign to a middle management post at the end of the secondment – Request to be reassigned – Interests of the service – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-517/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21754Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Vladimir Grieger v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Secondment – Commitment to reassign to a middle management post at the end of the secondment – Request to be reassigned – Interests of the service – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.#Case T-517/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21755Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS – Earlier EU figurative mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-454/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21756Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS – Earlier EU figurative mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-454/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21757Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Politistikos Organismos Oi Dromoi tis Elias v European Commission.#Institutional law – Selection of partners to carry out Europe Direct (2021-2025) activities in Greece – Call for proposals procedure – Eligibility criteria – Rejection of application.#Case T-352/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21758Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Politistikos Organismos Oi Dromoi tis Elias v European Commission.#Institutional law – Selection of partners to carry out Europe Direct (2021-2025) activities in Greece – Call for proposals procedure – Eligibility criteria – Rejection of application.#Case T-352/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21759Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Agrofert, a.s. v European Parliament.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the investigation against the former Prime Minister of the Czech Republic on the misuse of EU funds and potential conflicts of interest – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Interest in bringing proceedings in part ceasing to exist – No need to adjudicate in part – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-174/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.
21760Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Agrofert, a.s. v European Parliament.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Documents relating to the investigation against the former Prime Minister of the Czech Republic on the misuse of EU funds and potential conflicts of interest – Refusal to grant access – Exception relating to protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits – Interest in bringing proceedings in part ceasing to exist – No need to adjudicate in part – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-174/21.cjeu_case · 28 сентября 2022 г.