2121Case T-80/26: Action brought on 5 February 2026 – Szivos v EUIPO – Szőnyi (Slabs)cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2122Case T-79/26: Action brought on 5 February 2026 – Ecologistas en Acción v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2123Case T-77/26: Action brought on 5 February 2026 – AUDCB and Others v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2124Case C-66/26 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2026 by SBK Art OOO against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2025 in Case T-607/24, SBK Art v Councilcjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2125Case C-62/26 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2026 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, in liquidation, against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2025 in Case T-524/22, MeSoFa v Commission and SRBcjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2126Case C-61/26 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2026 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, in liquidation, against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 26 November 2025 in Case T-523/22, MeSoFa v Commission and SRBcjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2127Case C-59/26: Action brought on 5 February 2026 – European Commission v Republic of Polandcjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2128Case C-57/26, A1 Telekom Austria: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 5 February 2026 – Bundesarbeitskammer v A1 Telekom Austria AGcjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2129Ordonnance du Tribunal (cinquième chambre, siégeant avec cinq juges) du 5 février 2026.#HM et LT contre Ryanair DAC.#Radiation.#Affaire T-746/25.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2130Case T-746/25, Ryanair: Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 5 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Königs Wusterhausen – Germany) – HM and LT v Ryanair DACcjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2132Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Urban Vision SpA v Comune di Milano and Digital Vox Srl, anciennement A&C Network Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/23/EU – Procedure for the award of concession contracts – Project financing at the initiative of a private operator – Assessment and approval of a financing proposal – Call for tenders launched on the basis of that proposal – Pre-emption right of the economic operator that is the promoter, subject to ensuring the conditions of the best offer – Modification made after the submission of the initial offer – Article 3 – Principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency – Breach.#Case C-810/24.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2133Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Urban Vision SpA v Comune di Milano and Digital Vox Srl, anciennement A&C Network Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2014/23/EU – Procedure for the award of concession contracts – Project financing at the initiative of a private operator – Assessment and approval of a financing proposal – Call for tenders launched on the basis of that proposal – Pre-emption right of the economic operator that is the promoter, subject to ensuring the conditions of the best offer – Modification made after the submission of the initial offer – Article 3 – Principles of equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency – Breach.#Case C-810/24.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2134Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 5 février 2026.#NP contre Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Politique d’asile – Directive 2013/32/UE – Procédures communes pour l’octroi et le retrait de la protection internationale – Article 33 – Motifs d’irrecevabilité – Article 38 – Concept de “pays tiers sûr” – Conditions de mise en œuvre – Lien de connexion entre le demandeur et le pays tiers concerné – Critères – Méthodes d’appréciation – Article 46 – Droit à un recours effectif – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-718/24.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2135Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#NP v Predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia za bezhantsite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 33 – Grounds of inadmissibility – Article 38 – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Conditions for implementation – Connection between the applicant and the third country concerned – Criteria – Assessment methods – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-718/24.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2136Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#JG v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the actions of the Russian Federation destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 3i(1) and (3ad) – Annex XXI – Prohibition on importing goods generating significant revenues for the Russian Federation into the European Union – Importation of a vehicle.#Case C-619/24.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2137Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Prohibition on providing specialised financial messaging services to certain Russian credit institutions and their Russian subsidiaries – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 2(1)(b) and (d) and Annex – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Article 3(1)(b) and (d) and Annex I – Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 1e and Annex VIII – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5h and Annex XIV – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures apply – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on those lists – Obligation to state reasons – Right to property – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Right to effective judicial protection – Misuse of powers.#Case C-572/24 P.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2138Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Case C-572/24 P.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2139Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Giorgio Fidenato, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole « In Trois » v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – Measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in the environment – Directive 2001/18/EC – Article 26c(1) and (3) – Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/321 – Prohibition of the cultivation of MON 810 GMO maize in Italy – Validity – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 114 TFEU – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom to conduct a business – Articles 16 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-364/24 and C-393/24.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026
2140Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 February 2026.#Giorgio Fidenato, en son nom propre et en tant que propriétaire de l’exploitation agricole « In Trois » v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Deliberate release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – Measures to avoid the unintended presence of GMOs in the environment – Directive 2001/18/EC – Article 26c(1) and (3) – Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/321 – Prohibition of the cultivation of MON 810 GMO maize in Italy – Validity – Free movement of goods – Articles 34 and 114 TFEU – Principles of proportionality and non-discrimination – Freedom to conduct a business – Articles 16 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Joined Cases C-364/24 and C-393/24.cjeu_case · 5 février 2026