20601Case T-640/22 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — Westpole Belgium v Parliament (Interim measures — Public service contracts — External provision for IT services — Application for interim measures — Lack of urgency)cjeu_case · 6 décembre 2022
20602Rectification order of 6 December 2022.#Telefónica de España, SA v European Commission.#Rectification order.#Case C-478/22 P(R).cjeu_case · 6 décembre 2022
20603Case C-746/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 6 December 2022 — Slovenské Energetické Strojárne A. S. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóságacjeu_case · 6 décembre 2022
20604Case T-720/21: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — G.J. Riedel v EUIPO — BrewDog (Punk) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 6 décembre 2022
20605Case T-280/20: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — CX v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal from post — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 6 décembre 2022
20606Case T-52/20: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — CX v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal from post — Reinstatement decision — Application for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Claim for compensation — Loss of opportunity for promotion — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)cjeu_case · 6 décembre 2022
20607Case T-735/16: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — CX v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal from post — Decision to reduce the remuneration of the applicant — No need to adjudicate)cjeu_case · 6 décembre 2022
20608Case T-758/22: Action brought on 5 December 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce (Shoes)cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20609Case T-757/22: Action brought on 5 December 2022 — Puma v EUIPO — Road Star Group (Footwear)cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20610Case T-756/22: Action brought on 5 December 2022 — Roethig López v EUIPO — William Grant & Sons Irish Brands (AMAZONIAN GIN COMPANY)cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20612Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 December 2022.#Tigercat International Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-612/22 P.cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20613Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 December 2022.#Tigercat International Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-612/22 P.cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20614Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 December 2022.#Gugler France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-594/22 P.cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20615Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 December 2022.#Gugler France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-594/22 P.cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20616Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 December 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-571/22 P.cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20617Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 December 2022.#Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-571/22 P.cjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20618Case C-744/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Nessebar (Bulgaria) lodged on 5 December 2022 — Vodosnabdyavane i kanalizatsia EAD v PQcjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20619Case T-782/19: Order of the General Court of 5 December 2022 — St Schrader Holding Company UK v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022
20620Case T-771/19: Order of the General Court of 5 December 2022 — Experian Finance 2012 v Commissioncjeu_case · 5 décembre 2022