Catalogue des documents juridiques (cjeu_case)

104 314 documents
2043

Case T-213/25: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO – Oraczewska (100) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 100 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
2044

Case T-212/25: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO – Oraczewska (100) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 100 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
2045

Case T-211/25: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO – Oraczewska (200) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 200 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
2046

Case T-210/25: Order of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v EUIPO – Oraczewska (300) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 300 – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Relevant territory – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·
2047

Case T-693/25: Judgment of the General Court of 11 February 2026 – Tokareva v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Re-inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of benefitting from a leading businessperson operating in Russia – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Error of assessment – Article 266 TFEU)

cjeu_case ·
2049

Arrêt du Tribunal (chambre préjudicielle) du 11 février 2026.#I. S.A. contre Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Système commun de TVA – Droit à déduction de la TVA payée en amont – Article 167, article 168, sous a), et article 178, sous a), de la directive 2006/112/CE – Délivrance de la facture mentionnant la TVA au cours de la période imposable suivant celle au titre de laquelle le droit à déduction est exercé – Neutralité fiscale et proportionnalité.#Affaire T-689/24.

cjeu_case ·
2050

Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.#I. S.A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Right to deduct input VAT – Article 167, Article 168(a) and Article 178(a) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Issuing of the invoice showing the VAT during the tax period following that in respect of which the right of deduction is exercised – Fiscal neutrality and proportionality.#Case T-689/24.

cjeu_case ·
2051

Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.#Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Cristian General Serv SRL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable transactions – Concept of ‘supply of services for consideration’ – Article 2(1)(c), Article 24(1) and Article 25(a) and (c) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable amount – Concept of ‘consideration’ – Article 73 and point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 78 of Directive 2006/112 – Holders of related rights – Communication of phonograms and audiovisual programmes without a licence – Remuneration paid to the collective management organisation – Surcharge.#Case T-643/24.

cjeu_case ·
2052

Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026.#Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Cristian General Serv SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Taxable transactions – Concept of ‘supply of services for consideration’ – Article 2(1)(c), Article 24(1) and Article 25(a) and (c) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable amount – Concept of ‘consideration’ – Article 73 and point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 78 of Directive 2006/112 – Holders of related rights – Communication of phonograms and audiovisual programmes without a licence – Remuneration paid to the collective management organisation – Surcharge.#Case T-643/24.

cjeu_case ·
2055

Case T-689/24, Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny – Poland) – I. S.A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of VAT – Right to deduct input VAT – Article 167, Article 168(a) and Article 178(a) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Issuing of the invoice showing the VAT during the tax period following that in respect of which the right of deduction is exercised – Fiscal neutrality and proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
2056

Case T-643/24, Credidam: Judgment of the General Court (Chamber giving preliminary rulings) of 11 February 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti – Romania) – Centrul Român pentru Administrarea Drepturilor Artiștilor Interpreți (Credidam) v Cristian General Serv SRL (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax – Taxable transactions – Concept of supply of services for consideration – Article 2(1)(c), Article 24(1) and Article 25(a) and (c) of Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable amount – Concept of consideration – Article 73 and point (a) of the first paragraph of Article 78 of Directive 2006/112 – Holders of related rights – Communication of phonograms and audiovisual programmes without a licence – Remuneration paid to the collective management organisation – Surcharge)

cjeu_case ·