Каталог правовых документов (cjeu_case)

104 314 документов
20502

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#CJ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(2) – Determination of the competent judicial authorities – Decision to postpone surrender adopted by a body not having the status of executing judicial authority – Article 23 – Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender – Consequences – Article 12 and Article 24(1) – Keeping the requested person in detention for the purposes of criminal proceedings in the executing Member State – Articles 6, 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the accused person to appear in person at his trial.#Case C-492/22 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
20503

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#CJ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – European arrest warrant – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – Article 6(2) – Determination of the competent judicial authorities – Decision to postpone surrender adopted by a body not having the status of executing judicial authority – Article 23 – Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender – Consequences – Article 12 and Article 24(1) – Keeping the requested person in detention for the purposes of criminal proceedings in the executing Member State – Articles 6, 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the accused person to appear in person at his trial.#Case C-492/22 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
20504

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 8 December 2022.#Criminal proceedings against MW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(1) – Principle of assimilation of earlier convictions handed down in another Member State – Obligation to ensure that the effects attached to those convictions are equivalent to those attached to previous national convictions – National rules concerning subsequent formation of a cumulative sentence – Multiple offences – Determination of an aggregate sentence – Maximum of 15 years for non-life custodial sentences – Article 3(5) – Exception – Offence committed before the handing down or execution of sentences in another Member State.#Case C-583/22 PPU.

cjeu_case ·
20506

Case C-543/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court — Ireland) — Save Roscam Peninsula CLG, SC-F, MF, PH, Abbey Park and District Residents Association Baldoyle v An Bord Pleanála, Galway City Council, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Ireland, the Attorney General and Fingal County Council (Aarhus Convention — Access to justice — Requirement for a procedure which is not prohibitively expensive — Scope — Obligation to interpret in accordance with the national procedural law)

cjeu_case ·
20507

Case C-464/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland)) — Enniskerry Alliance, Enniskerry Demesne Management Company CLG and Protect East Meath Limited v An Bord Pleanála, the Attorney General, Ireland and Louth County Council (Environment — Aarhus Convention — Access to justice — Requirement for a procedure which is not prohibitively expensive — Scope — Obligation to interpret in accordance with the national procedural law)

cjeu_case ·
20508

Case C-492/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against CJ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 6(2) — Determination of the competent judicial authorities — Decision to postpone surrender adopted by a body not having the status of executing judicial authority — Article 23 — Expiry of the time limits provided for surrender — Consequences — Article 12 and Article 24(1) — Keeping the requested person in detention for the purposes of criminal proceedings in the executing Member State — Articles 6, 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right of the accused person to appear in person at his trial)

cjeu_case ·
20512

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#AAS „BTA Baltic Insurance Company” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and Tieslietu ministrija.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 18(1) – Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality – Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender – Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders – Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract – Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders.#Case C-769/21.

cjeu_case ·
20513

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#AAS „BTA Baltic Insurance Company” v Iepirkumu uzraudzības birojs and Tieslietu ministrija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 18(1) – Principles of equal treatment, transparency and proportionality – Decision to withdraw an invitation to tender – Tenders submitted separately by two tenderers belonging to the same economic operator and constituting the two most economically advantageous tenders – Refusal of the successful tenderer to sign the contract – Decision of the contracting authority to refuse the tender of the next tenderer, terminate the procedure and issue a new call for tenders.#Case C-769/21.

cjeu_case ·
20514

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#GV v Caisse nationale d’assurance pension.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of persons – Article 45 TFEU – Workers – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(1) and (2) – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Survivor’s pension – Members of a civil partnership – National legislation making the grant of a survivor’s pension conditional upon the entry in the national register of a partnership that was validly concluded and registered in another Member State.#Case C-731/21.

cjeu_case ·
20515

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#GV v Caisse nationale d’assurance pension.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of persons – Article 45 TFEU – Workers – Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 – Article 7(1) and (2) – Equal treatment – Social advantages – Survivor’s pension – Members of a civil partnership – National legislation making the grant of a survivor’s pension conditional upon the entry in the national register of a partnership that was validly concluded and registered in another Member State.#Case C-731/21.

cjeu_case ·
20516

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 8 décembre 2022.#VB contre GUPFINGER Einrichtungsstudio GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 93/13/CEE – Clauses abusives dans les contrats conclus avec les consommateurs – Dénonciation illégitime d’un contrat par le consommateur – Clause déclarée abusive déterminant le droit du professionnel à la réparation du préjudice – Application du droit interne à caractère supplétif.#Affaire C-625/21.

cjeu_case ·
20518

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#QE v Caisse régionale de Crédit mutuel de Loire-Atlantique et du Centre Ouest.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 3(1) – Article 4 – Criteria for assessing whether a term is unfair – Term relating to the accelerated repayment of a loan agreement – Contractual dispensation from the requirement for a formal written demand.#Case C-600/21.

cjeu_case ·
20519

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 December 2022.#QE v Caisse régionale de Crédit mutuel de Loire-Atlantique et du Centre Ouest.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 3(1) – Article 4 – Criteria for assessing whether a term is unfair – Term relating to the accelerated repayment of a loan agreement – Contractual dispensation from the requirement for a formal written demand.#Case C-600/21.

cjeu_case ·