20401Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Rhonny Baert v European Commission.#Civil service – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a crediting of additional years – Time limit for complaints – Unjust enrichment – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-111/22.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20402Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Christiane Kremer v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a crediting of additional years of pensionable service – Time limit for complaints – Unjust enrichment – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-110/22.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20403Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Christiane Kremer v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Retirement pension – Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union – Transfer to the EU scheme – Crediting of additional years of pensionable service – Action for annulment – Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a crediting of additional years of pensionable service – Time limit for complaints – Unjust enrichment – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-110/22.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20404Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Esedra v European Parliament.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Full management of the Parliament’s early childhood centre in Brussels – Rejection of a tenderer’s tender – Abnormally low tender – Compliance of a tender with the conditions laid down in the specifications – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-46/22.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20405Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Esedra v European Parliament.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – Full management of the Parliament’s early childhood centre in Brussels – Rejection of a tenderer’s tender – Abnormally low tender – Compliance of a tender with the conditions laid down in the specifications – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest errors of assessment.#Case T-46/22.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20406Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ – Earlier EU word mark Newport – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-18/22.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20407Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ – Earlier EU word mark Newport – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-18/22.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20408Case T-111/22: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Baert v Commission (Civil service — Retirement pension — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Crediting of additional years of pensionable service — Action for annulment — Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a crediting of additional years — Time limit for complaints — Unjust enrichment — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20409Case T-110/22: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Kremer v Commission (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Retirement pensions — Pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the European Union — Transfer to the EU scheme — Additional years of pensionable service — Action for annulment — Request for repayment of transferred capital which has not given rise to a bonus — Time limit for complaints — Undue enrichment — Manifest inadmissibility)cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20410Case T-46/22: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Esedra v Parliament (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Full management of the Parliament’s early childhood centre in Brussels — Rejection of a tenderer’s tender — Abnormally low tender — Compliance of a tender with the conditions laid down in the specifications — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest errors of assessment)cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20411Case T-18/22: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2022 — Nemport Liman İşletmeleri Ve Özel Antrepo Nakliye Ticaret AŞ v EUIPO — Newport Europe (NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark NEMPORT LİMAN İŞLETMELERİ — Earlier EU word mark Newport — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20412Case C-782/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof’s-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands) lodged on 14 December 2022 — XX v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienstcjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20413Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#ICA Traffic GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Public procurement – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Supply of disinfection robots to European hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 crisis – Maximum quantity of goods to be supplied under a framework contract – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework – Act not amenable to review – Inadmissibility.#Case T-717/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20414Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#ICA Traffic GmbH v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Public procurement – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Supply of disinfection robots to European hospitals in the context of the COVID-19 crisis – Maximum quantity of goods to be supplied under a framework contract – Act forming part of a purely contractual framework – Act not amenable to review – Inadmissibility.#Case T-717/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20415Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Eurol BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark eurol LUBRICANTS – Earlier national word mark EUROLLUBRICANTS – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Use with the trade mark proprietor’s consent – No alteration of distinctive character – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-636/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20416Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Eurol BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark eurol LUBRICANTS – Earlier national word mark EUROLLUBRICANTS – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Articles 15 and 57 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Articles 18 and 64 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Use with the trade mark proprietor’s consent – No alteration of distinctive character – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-636/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20417Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Agrarfrost GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a smiley – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use – No alteration of distinctive character.#Case T-553/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20418Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2022.#Agrarfrost GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark – Shape of a smiley – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use – No alteration of distinctive character.#Case T-553/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20419Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#Pierre Lannier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Locus standi – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-530/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.
20420Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#Pierre Lannier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Locus standi – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-530/21.cjeu_case · 14 декабря 2022 г.