Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
19102

Case T-766/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Canel Ferreiro v Council (Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service – Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)

cjeu_case ·
19103

Case T-395/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Hypo Vorarlberg Bank v SRB (2022 ex ante Contributions) (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Determination of the annual target level of the SRF – Cap provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 291(2) TFEU – Article 70(7) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Implementing powers conferred on the Council – Duly justified specific cases – Scope of the implementing powers – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment)

cjeu_case ·
19104

Case T-363/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Akhmedov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of leading businessperson – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
19105

Case T-302/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Vinokurov v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Notion of leading businessperson – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to respect for private life – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business)

cjeu_case ·
19106

Cases T-200/22 and T-314/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Poland v Commission (Environment – Lignite mining activities at an open-cast mine – Turów lignite mine (Poland) – Law governing the institutions – Failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of debts by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Removal of the case in the main proceedings from the register – No retroactive effect on the interim measures ordered – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
19107

Case T-116/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Belavia v Council (Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Organisation of activities of the Lukashenko regime facilitating the illegal crossing of the external borders of the European Union or contribution to those activities – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
19108

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Prokurator Generalny v D.J. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-43/22.

cjeu_case ·
19109

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Prokurator Generalny v D.J. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-43/22.

cjeu_case ·
19110

Case C-43/22, Prokurator Generalny (Polish extraordinary appeal II): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Prokurator Generalny (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
19111

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
19112

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
19113

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024 (Extracts).#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s margin of discretion – SRB’s margin of discretion – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-360/21.

cjeu_case ·
19114

Case T-360/21: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Portigon v SRB (Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions – Plea of illegality – Legal basis of Regulation No 806/2014 – Article 114 TFEU – Equal treatment – Commission’s discretion – SRB’s discretion – Obligation to state reasons)

cjeu_case ·
19115

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-720/21.

cjeu_case ·
19116

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal’ – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-720/21.

cjeu_case ·
19117

Case C-720/21, Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Polish extraordinary appeal): Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy – Poland) – Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of court or tribunal – Criteria – Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych (Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Reference for a preliminary ruling from an adjudicating panel which does not have the status of an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
19118

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Decal España, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-509/14.

cjeu_case ·
19119

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Decal España, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors – Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) – Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part – Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute – No need to adjudicate in part – New aid – Recovery – Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market – Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities.#Case T-509/14.

cjeu_case ·
19120

Case T-509/14: Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2024 – Decal España v Commission (State aid - Aid granted by the Spanish authorities to certain economic interest groupings (EIGs) and their investors - Tax regime applicable to certain finance lease agreements for the purchase of ships (Spanish tax lease system) - Decision declaring the aid partly incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery in part - Disappearance in part of the subject matter of the dispute - No need to adjudicate in part - New aid - Recovery - Contractual clauses protecting the beneficiaries against the recovery of unlawful State aid incompatible with the internal market - Division of powers between the Commission and the national authorities)

cjeu_case ·