Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
19084

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Warmeston OÜ v Elering AS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Renewable energy subsidy – Construction of a combined heat and power installation – Decision C(2017) 8456 final – Amendments to the Estonian support scheme for electricity produced from renewable sources and efficient cogeneration – Recitals 42 and 43 – Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘start of works’ – Type and intensity of the scrutiny that must be conducted by the competent national authority.#Case C-446/23.

cjeu_case ·
19085

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Warmeston OÜ v Elering AS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Renewable energy subsidy – Construction of a combined heat and power installation – Decision C(2017) 8456 final – Amendments to the Estonian support scheme for electricity produced from renewable sources and efficient cogeneration – Recitals 42 and 43 – Concepts of ‘project’ and ‘start of works’ – Type and intensity of the scrutiny that must be conducted by the competent national authority.#Case C-446/23.

cjeu_case ·
19086

Case C-446/23, Warmeston: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 May 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus – Estonia) – Warmeston OÜ v Elering AS (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Renewable energy subsidy – Construction of a combined heat and power installation – Decision C(2017) 8546 final – Amendments to the Estonian support scheme for electricity produced from renewable sources and efficient cogeneration – Recitals 42 and 43 – Concepts of project and start of works – Type and intensity of the scrutiny that must be conducted by the competent national authority)

cjeu_case ·
19089

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Maria Canel Ferreiro v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service – Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-766/22.

cjeu_case ·
19090

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Maria Canel Ferreiro v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service – Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-766/22.

cjeu_case ·
19091

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Determination of the annual target level of the SRF – Ceiling provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 291(2) TFEU – Article 70(7) of Regulation No 806/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Implementing powers conferred on the Council – Duly justified specific cases – Scope of the implementing powers – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-395/22.

cjeu_case ·
19092

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Determination of the annual target level of the SRF – Cap provided for in the first and fourth subparagraphs of Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Article 291(2) TFEU – Article 70(7) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/81 – Implementing powers conferred on the Council – Duly justified specific cases – Scope of the implementing powers – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-395/22.

cjeu_case ·
19093

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 29 mai 2024.#Farkhad Teimurovich Akhmedov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion de “femme ou homme d’affaires influents” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous g), du règlement (UE) no 269/2014 – Erreur d’appréciation.#Affaire T-363/22.

cjeu_case ·
19094

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Farkhad Teimurovich Akhmedov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-363/22.

cjeu_case ·
19095

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 29 mai 2024.#Alexander Semenovich Vinokurov contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Mesures restrictives prises eu égard aux actions compromettant ou menaçant l’intégrité territoriale, la souveraineté et l’indépendance de l’Ukraine – Gel des fonds – Liste des personnes, des entités et des organismes auxquels s’applique le gel des fonds et des ressources économiques – Inscription et maintien du nom du requérant sur la liste – Notion d’“homme d’affaires influent” – Article 2, paragraphe 1, sous g), de la décision 2014/145/PESC – Exception d’illégalité – Proportionnalité – Obligation de motivation – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Erreur d’appréciation – Droit au respect de la vie privée – Droit de propriété – Liberté d’entreprise.#Affaire T-302/22.

cjeu_case ·
19097

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Environment – Lignite mining activities at an open-cast mine – Turów lignite mine (Poland) – Law governing the institutions – Failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of debts by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Removal of the case in the main proceedings from the register – No retroactive effect on the interim measures ordered – Obligation to state reasons.#Cases T-200/22 and T-314/22.

cjeu_case ·
19098

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Environment – Lignite mining activities at an open-cast mine – Turów lignite mine (Poland) – Law governing the institutions – Failure to comply with an order of the Court of Justice imposing interim measures – Periodic penalty payment – Recovery of debts by offsetting – Article 101(1) and Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Removal of the case in the main proceedings from the register – No retroactive effect on the interim measures ordered – Obligation to state reasons.#Cases T-200/22 and T-314/22.

cjeu_case ·
19099

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Belavia – Belarusian Airlines AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Organisation of activities of the Lukashenko regime facilitating the illegal crossing of the external borders of the European Union or contribution to those activities – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-116/22.

cjeu_case ·
19100

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Belavia – Belarusian Airlines AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Organisation of activities of the Lukashenko regime facilitating the illegal crossing of the external borders of the European Union or contribution to those activities – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-116/22.

cjeu_case ·