Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316,885 documents
17741

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2024.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark BF BELFE – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes – Proof of genuine use – No purely internal use – Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-54/23.

cjeu_case ·
17742

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2024.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark BF BELFE – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes – Proof of genuine use – No purely internal use – Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-54/23.

cjeu_case ·
17743

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2024.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BELFE – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes – Proof of genuine use – No purely internal use – Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-50/23.

cjeu_case ·
17744

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2024.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BELFE – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes – Proof of genuine use – No purely internal use – Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-50/23.

cjeu_case ·
17747

Case T-338/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – Next Media Project v EFCA (Public supply contracts – Tendering procedure – Communication and event organisation services – Rejection of the tender – Irregular tender – Failure to supply the information required as a condition for participating in the procedure – Article 141(1)(b) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Change in the method of transmission of certain information – Infringement of the tender specifications – Manifest error of assessment)

cjeu_case ·
17749

Case T-54/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BF BELFE) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark BF BELFE – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes – Proof of genuine use – No purely internal use – Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

cjeu_case ·
17750

Case T-50/23: Judgment of the General Court of 17 July 2024 – W.B. Studio v EUIPO – E.Land Italy (BELFE) (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark BELFE – Genuine use of the mark – Partial revocation – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (b), and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Affixing of the trade mark to goods or to the packaging thereof in the European Union solely for export purposes – Proof of genuine use – No purely internal use – Article 19 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625)

cjeu_case ·
17751

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#BNP Paribas v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-420/22.

cjeu_case ·
17752

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#BNP Paribas v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-420/22.

cjeu_case ·
17753

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-410/22.

cjeu_case ·
17754

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Crédit agricole SA and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-410/22.

cjeu_case ·
17755

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#La Banque postale v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-394/22.

cjeu_case ·
17756

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#La Banque postale v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-394/22.

cjeu_case ·
17757

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#BPCE and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-393/22.

cjeu_case ·
17758

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#BPCE and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-393/22.

cjeu_case ·
17759

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-392/22.

cjeu_case ·
17760

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 17 July 2024.#Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel and Others v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism of credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) on the calculation of the ex ante contributions for the 2022 contribution period – Article 70(2) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Error of law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case T-392/22.

cjeu_case ·