Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161316) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43188) directive (8067)
316 885 documents
15124

Case T-136/23: Judgment of the General Court of 6 November 2024 – Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists v EUIPO – Grande Vitae (vintae) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vintae – Earlier national word mark VITAE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – No limitation in consequence of acquiescence – Article 53(2) of Regulation No 40/94)

cjeu_case ·
15126

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

cjeu_case ·
15127

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Capital injection – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing financial difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-827/22.

cjeu_case ·
15128

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ‘Failing or likely to fail’ assessment of Sberbank banka – Refusal to grant access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of the confidentiality of information that is protected as such under EU law – Concept of ‘confidential information’ – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests.#Case T-790/22.

cjeu_case ·
15129

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ‘Failing or likely to fail’ assessment of Sberbank banka – Refusal to grant access – Obligation to state reasons – Exception relating to the protection of the confidentiality of information that is protected as such under EU law – Concept of ‘confidential information’ – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests.#Case T-790/22.

cjeu_case ·
15130

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Portumo - Madeira - Montagem e Manutenção de Tubaria, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering recovery of aid paid under it – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Freedom of movement for workers.#Cases T-713/22 and T-720/22.

cjeu_case ·
15131

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Portumo - Madeira - Montagem e Manutenção de Tubaria, SA (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering recovery of aid paid under it – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Freedom of movement for workers.#Cases T-713/22 and T-720/22.

cjeu_case ·
15134

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ECB’s assessment that Sberbank banka was failing or likely to fail – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Admissibility – Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Supervised entity – Shareholders’ rights of defence – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right of access to the ECB’s file.#Case T-632/22.

cjeu_case ·
15135

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ECB’s assessment that Sberbank banka was failing or likely to fail – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Admissibility – Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Supervised entity – Shareholders’ rights of defence – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right of access to the ECB’s file.#Case T-632/22.

cjeu_case ·
15136

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#CFA Institute v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCA CHARTERED CONTROLLER ANALYST CERTIFICATE – Earlier EU word mark CFA and earlier EU figurative mark CFA CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – New decision taken following annulment in part of an earlier decision by the Court – Scope of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Res judicata.#Case T-561/22.

cjeu_case ·
15137

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#CFA Institute v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCA CHARTERED CONTROLLER ANALYST CERTIFICATE – Earlier EU word mark CFA and earlier EU figurative mark CFA CHARTERED FINANCIAL ANALYST – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – New decision taken following annulment in part of an earlier decision by the Court – Scope of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Res judicata.#Case T-561/22.

cjeu_case ·
15138

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of personal liability – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-520/22.

cjeu_case ·
15139

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of personal liability – Error of assessment – Proportionality.#Case T-520/22.

cjeu_case ·
15140

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#Millennium BCP Participações, SGPS, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda and BCP África, SGPS, Lda v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring that scheme to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering recovery of aid paid under it – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – No derogation from the condition relating to the creation or maintenance of jobs in the Autonomous Region of Madeira – Principle of sound administration – Principle of sincere cooperation – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Case T-462/22.

cjeu_case ·