Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 документ
7522

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#RC v VertretungsNetz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Linz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Principles of EU law – National procedure for appointing a representative for a person with a mental disability – Difficulty in finding an appropriate representative – Doubts as to the judicial nature of the procedure before the body making the reference.#Case C-406/24.

cjeu_case ·
7523

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds v Belgische Staat.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Derogations – Article 4(1)(a), b) and (d) – Release of certain frozen funds for specific expenses – Payment of a roll fee and a flat-rate contribution for the purpose of instituting an action for annulment against a decision implementing that regulation – Included.#Case C-384/24.

cjeu_case ·
7524

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Russisch-Kirgizisch Ontwikkelingsfonds v Belgische Staat.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common foreign and security policy – Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Ukraine – Article 2 – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Derogations – Article 4(1)(a), b) and (d) – Release of certain frozen funds for specific expenses – Payment of a roll fee and a flat-rate contribution for the purpose of instituting an action for annulment against a decision implementing that regulation – Included.#Case C-384/24.

cjeu_case ·
7525

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Duca di Salaparuta SpA v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common organisation of the market in wine – Community framework for the protection of wine names – Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 – Article 54 – Quality wines produced in specified regions (quality wines psr) – Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 – Article 43(2) and Article 51 – Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 – Article 118k(2) and Article 118s – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 101(2) and Article 107 – Protection, under EU law, of quality wines psr recognised under national law – Conflict between a protected wine name and an earlier well-known mark containing a word identical to that name – Allegedly misleading name – Transitional regime – Automatic extension of protection – Complete nature of the system of protection – Legal certainty.#Case C-341/24.

cjeu_case ·
7526

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Duca di Salaparuta SpA v Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common organisation of the market in wine – Community framework for the protection of wine names – Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 – Article 54 – Quality wines produced in specified regions (quality wines psr) – Regulation (EC) No 479/2008 – Article 43(2) and Article 51 – Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 – Article 118k(2) and Article 118s – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 101(2) and Article 107 – Protection, under EU law, of quality wines psr recognised under national law – Conflict between a protected wine name and an earlier well-known mark containing a word identical to that name – Allegedly misleading name – Transitional regime – Automatic extension of protection – Complete nature of the system of protection – Legal certainty.#Case C-341/24.

cjeu_case ·
7527

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministério Público v YX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Objective of social rehabilitation – Residence of the convicted person – Enforcement of that sentence by the executing State in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Suspension of the enforcement of a custodial sentence ordered by a court of the executing Member State – Article 8 – Obligation, for the executing State, to recognise the judgment and enforce the sentence – Article 17 – Option, for the executing State, to determine the procedures for enforcement.#Case C-215/24.

cjeu_case ·
7528

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministério Público v YX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca do Porto - Juízo Local Criminal de Vila Nova de Gaia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Objective of social rehabilitation – Residence of the convicted person – Enforcement of that sentence by the executing State in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Suspension of the enforcement of a custodial sentence ordered by a court of the executing Member State – Article 8 – Obligation, for the executing State, to recognise the judgment and enforce the sentence – Article 17 – Option, for the executing State, to determine the procedures for enforcement.#Case C-215/24.

cjeu_case ·
7529

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#UJ v Österreichische Zahnärztekammer.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 3(d) and (e) – Provision of healthcare through telemedicine – Concept of ‘telemedicine’ – Cross-border healthcare provided through telemedicine – Complex medical treatment that includes healthcare provided in person and through telemedicine – Member State of treatment – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society service – Directive 2005/36/EC – Professional qualifications – Freedom to provide services – Scope – Article 56 TFEU.#Case C-115/24.

cjeu_case ·
7530

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#UJ v Österreichische Zahnärztekammer.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Cross-border healthcare – Directive 2011/24/EU – Article 3(d) and (e) – Provision of healthcare through telemedicine – Concept of ‘telemedicine’ – Cross-border healthcare provided through telemedicine – Complex medical treatment that includes healthcare provided in person and through telemedicine – Member State of treatment – Directive 2000/31/EC – Information society service – Directive 2005/36/EC – Professional qualifications – Freedom to provide services – Scope – Article 56 TFEU.#Case C-115/24.

cjeu_case ·
7531

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#G.L. v AB SpA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation.#Case C-38/24.

cjeu_case ·
7532

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#G.L. v AB SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles 2, 5 and 7 – Articles 21, 24 and 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 1 – Article 2(1) and (2)(b) – Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of disability – Indirect discrimination – Difference of treatment in respect of an employee who does not himself or herself have a disability but cares for his or her child who has a disability – Article 5 – Employer’s obligation to make reasonable accommodation.#Case C-38/24.

cjeu_case ·
7533

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 11 septembre 2025.#P.M. contre S. Snc.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2000/78/CE – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Article 2 – Discrimination fondée sur le handicap – Licenciement d’un travailleur en congé de maladie – Réglementation nationale prévoyant la même limite de nombre de jours de congé de maladie par année civile pour tous les travailleurs d’un même secteur d’activité – Article 5 – Aménagements raisonnables.#Affaire C-5/24.

cjeu_case ·
7534

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#P.M. v S. Snc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Ravenna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Article 2 – Discrimination based on disability – Dismissal of a worker on sick leave – National legislation laying down the same limit on the number of days of sick leave per calendar year for all workers in the same sector of activity – Article 5 – Reasonable accommodation.#Case C-5/24.

cjeu_case ·