Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317,024 documents
681

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds contre Anne Frank Stichting e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Propriété intellectuelle – Droit d’auteur et droits voisins – Directive 2001/29/CE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “communication au public” – Article 6, paragraphe 3 – Mesures techniques efficaces – Œuvre tombée dans le domaine public dans certains États membres et encore protégée par un droit d’auteur dans un autre État membre – Publication de cette œuvre sur un site Internet – Mesure de blocage géographique destinée à empêcher l’accès à ce site à partir de l’État membre dans lequel l’œuvre est encore protégée – Possibilité de contourner cette mesure au moyen d’un réseau privé virtuel [virtual private network (VPN)] ou d’un service similaire.#Affaire C-788/24.

cjeu_case ·
682

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Anne Frank Fonds v Anne Frank Stichting and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Copyright and related rights – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘communication to the public’ – Article 6(3) – Effective technological measures – Work that is in the public domain in certain Member States and still protected by copyright in another Member State – Publication of that work on a website – Geo-blocking measure designed to prevent access to that website from the Member State in which the work is still protected – Possibility of circumventing that measure by means of a virtual private network (VPN) or similar service.#Case C-788/24.

cjeu_case ·
683

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 9 juillet 2026.#Fédération belge du stationnement ASBL et Interparking SA contre Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2001/42/CE – Évaluation des incidences de certains plans et programmes sur l’environnement – Article 2, sous a) – Notion de “plans et programmes” – Article 3, paragraphe 2, sous a) – Actes élaborés pour certains secteurs et définissant un cadre dans lequel la mise en œuvre des projets énumérés aux annexes I et II de la directive 2011/92/UE pourra être autorisée à l’avenir – Plan ou programme dans le secteur des transports, de l’aménagement du territoire urbain et rural ou de l’affectation des sols – Arrêté fixant des conditions d’exploitation des parkings – Maintien des effets d’un acte national en cas d’absence d’évaluation des incidences sur l’environnement – Conditions.#Affaire C-771/24.

cjeu_case ·
684

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Fédération belge du stationnement ASBL and Interparking SA v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, représentée par son Gouvernement.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2001/42/EC – Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – Article 2(a) – Concept of ‘plans and programmes’ – Article 3(2)(a) – Measures prepared for certain sectors and setting a framework for future development consent of projects listed in Annexes I and II to Directive 2011/92/EU – Plan or programme in the transport, town and country planning or land use sector – Order laying down the conditions for operating car parks – Maintenance of the effects of a national act where there is no environmental impact assessment – Conditions.#Case C-771/24.

cjeu_case ·
685

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Hortis GRC SA v JA and France Travail Île-de-France, anciennement Pôle emploi Île-de-France.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations – Article 3 – Choice made by the parties – Article 6 – Contract of employment – Mandatory rules of the law which would be applicable in the absence of choice – Determination of the applicable law – Contract of employment more closely connected with another country – Criteria for assessment – Closer connections resulting, in the performance of a contract of employment, from the parties’ choice of the law applicable to that contract.#Case C-768/24.

cjeu_case ·
686

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Appeal – State aid – Combined heat and power generation sector – Reform of the arrangements for support for cogeneration – Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Measures granted through State resources – Condition relating to the existence of a compulsory surcharge.#Case C-242/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
687

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Appeal – State aid – Combined heat and power generation sector – Reform of the arrangements for support for cogeneration – Decision of the European Commission declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Concept of ‘State aid’ – Measures granted through State resources – Condition relating to the existence of a compulsory surcharge.#Case C-242/24 P.

cjeu_case ·
688

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Società Eredi Raimondo Bufarini Srl – Servizi Ambientali v Ministero dell'Interno and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances – Directive 2012/18/EU – Article 2 – Scope – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘presence of dangerous substances’ – Continuous monitoring of substances actually present within an establishment – Anticipated or reasonably foreseeable presence – Determination by reference to the maximum quantities of substances indicated in the operating permit.#Case C-224/24.

cjeu_case ·
689

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ND v Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Making information relating to criminal convictions available to the public online in return for remuneration – Reconciling the right to protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Scope – Article 85 – Concept of processing of personal data carried out for ‘journalistic purposes’.#Case C-199/24.

cjeu_case ·
690

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ND v Legal Newsdesk Sweden AB, anciennement Garrapatica AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Scope – Making information relating to criminal convictions available to the public online in return for remuneration – Reconciling the right to protection of personal data with the right to freedom of expression and information – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Scope – Article 85 – Concept of processing of personal data carried out for ‘journalistic purposes’.#Case C-199/24.

cjeu_case ·
691

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ROGON GmbH & Co. KG and Others v Deutscher Fußballbund eV (DFB).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Regulations of a national football federation – Purchase of services from third parties outside that federation – Activity of the players’ agents – Restriction of competition by object or by effect – Exception to the prohibition in Article 101(1) TFEU – Scope – Objectives pursued by those regulations – Whether justified – Conditions – Pursuit of legitimate objectives in the public interest – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-428/23.

cjeu_case ·
692

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#ROGON GmbH & Co. KG and Others v Deutscher Fußballbund eV (DFB).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Competition – Professional football – Article 101(1) TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Regulations of a national football federation – Purchase of services from third parties outside that federation – Activity of the players’ agents – Restriction of competition by object or by effect – Exception to the prohibition in Article 101(1) TFEU – Scope – Objectives pursued by those regulations – Whether justified – Conditions – Pursuit of legitimate objectives in the public interest – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-428/23.

cjeu_case ·