Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161301) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43169) directive (8067)
316 851 documents
6802

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract – Determination of the court with jurisdiction – Contract of carriage by air concluded between a consumer and a trader – Passenger’s claim for compensation arising from a delayed flight – Assignment of that claim to a collection agency – Claim for compensation brought by the assignee against the air carrier before the court for the place of the aircraft’s departure – Place of performance of the obligation in question – Place in a Member State where, under the contract of carriage, the services were provided or should have been provided.#Case C-551/24.

cjeu_case ·
6803

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Second indent of Article 7(1)(b) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to a contract – Determination of the court with jurisdiction – Contract of carriage by air concluded between a consumer and a trader – Passenger’s claim for compensation arising from a delayed flight – Assignment of that claim to a collection agency – Claim for compensation brought by the assignee against the air carrier before the court for the place of the aircraft’s departure – Place of performance of the obligation in question – Place in a Member State where, under the contract of carriage, the services were provided or should have been provided.#Case C-551/24.

cjeu_case ·
6804

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Cabris lnvestments Ltd v Revetas Capital Advisors LLP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same third State – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element – Consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-540/24.

cjeu_case ·
6805

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Cabris lnvestments Ltd v Revetas Capital Advisors LLP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same third State – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element – Consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-540/24.

cjeu_case ·
6806

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL and Different Media SRL v Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași and Ministerul Antreprenoriatului şi Turismului - Agenţia pentru Întreprinderi Mici și Mijlocii, Atragere de Investiţii şi Promovare a Exportului Iaşi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Exemption for certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market – Translation error in the Romanian language version of that regulation – Legal effects of the regulation correcting that error – Possibility of recovering aid that was granted before the correction in compliance with the conditions set out in the version of the regulation containing the translation error – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-416/24 and C-417/24.

cjeu_case ·
6807

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL and Different Media SRL v Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași and Ministerul Antreprenoriatului şi Turismului - Agenţia pentru Întreprinderi Mici și Mijlocii, Atragere de Investiţii şi Promovare a Exportului Iaşi.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Exemption for certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market – Translation error in the Romanian language version of that regulation – Legal effects of the regulation correcting that error – Possibility of recovering aid that was granted before the correction in compliance with the conditions set out in the version of the regulation containing the translation error – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-416/24 and C-417/24.

cjeu_case ·
6808

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Judgment of the Court of Justice establishing a failure to fulfil obligations – Non-compliance – Article 260(2) TFEU – Environment – Directives 2008/98/EC and 1999/31/EC – Waste – Landfill on the island of Zakynthos (Greece) – Obligation to close that landfill, which has not been granted the required permit – Pecuniary penalties – Periodic penalty payments – Lump sum.#Case C-368/24.

cjeu_case ·
6810

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 9 octobre 2025.#Nestlé Sverige AB contre Miljönämnden i Helsingborgs kommun.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Sécurité des aliments – Règlement (UE) no 1169/2011 – Information des consommateurs sur les denrées alimentaires – Règlement délégué (UE) 2016/128 – Denrées alimentaires destinées à des fins médicales spéciales – Exigences spécifiques en matière d’information – Déclaration nutritionnelle obligatoire – Article 5, paragraphe 2, sous g) – Mentions obligatoires supplémentaires – Article 6, paragraphe 2 – Interdiction de répéter sur l’étiquetage les informations contenues dans la déclaration nutritionnelle obligatoire.#Affaire C-315/24.

cjeu_case ·
6811

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Nestlé Sverige AB v Miljönämnden i Helsingborgs kommun.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/128 – Food for special medical purposes – Specific information requirements – Mandatory nutrition declaration – Article 5(2)(g) – Additional mandatory particulars – Article 6(2) – Prohibition of the repetition on the labelling of information contained in the mandatory nutrition declaration.#Case C-315/24.

cjeu_case ·
6812

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Sindicat de Treballadores i Treballadors de les Administracions i els Serveis Publics (STAS - IV) v Valenciana D’ Estrategies i Recursos per a la Sostenibilitat Ambiental SA (VAERSA).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Point 1 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Works to improve protected natural areas – Time spent by workers travelling between a fixed point of departure and natural areas – Inclusion of that travelling time in the working time of those workers.#Case C-110/24.

cjeu_case ·
6813

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Sindicat de Treballadores i Treballadors de les Administracions i els Serveis Publics (STAS - IV) v Valenciana D’ Estrategies i Recursos per a la Sostenibilitat Ambiental SA (VAERSA).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Valenciana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2003/88/EC – Organisation of working time – Point 1 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘working time’ – Works to improve protected natural areas – Time spent by workers travelling between a fixed point of departure and natural areas – Inclusion of that travelling time in the working time of those workers.#Case C-110/24.

cjeu_case ·
6815

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Finanzamt Hamburg-Altona v XYRALITY GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 28 – Taking part in a supply of services – Articles 44 and 45 – Place of supply of services – Article 203 – VAT entered on an invoice – Electronically supplied services – App store – ‘In-app’ purchases.#Case C-101/24.

cjeu_case ·
6816

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Zwrotybankowe.pl sp. z o.o. v Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 22(2) – Imperative nature of that directive – Assignment to a third party by a consumer of his or her claim against a bank – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Examination by a national court of its own motion of the unfairness of the terms in a claim assignment agreement which is not subject to an ongoing dispute before that court.#Case C-80/24.

cjeu_case ·
6817

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Zwrotybankowe.pl sp. z o.o. v Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy - Śródmieścia w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Article 22(2) – Imperative nature of that directive – Assignment to a third party by a consumer of his or her claim against a bank – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Examination by a national court of its own motion of the unfairness of the terms in a claim assignment agreement which is not subject to an ongoing dispute before that court.#Case C-80/24.

cjeu_case ·