Документы: Европейский Союз

60561

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui v Departamento de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 1 de Pamplona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/CE – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4(1) – Principle of non-discrimination – Public sector education – National provision granting additional remuneration only to teachers employed for an indefinite duration as established public officials – Exclusion of teachers employed under a fixed-term contract governed by public law – Concept of ‘objective grounds’ – Characteristics inherent in the status of established public officials.#Case C-72/18.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60562

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 20 juin 2019.#« Oribalt Rīga » SIA contre Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Règlement (CEE) no 2913/92 – Article 30, paragraphe 2, sous b) et c) – Règlement (CEE) no 2454/93 – Article 152, paragraphe 1, sous a) et b) – Détermination de la valeur en douane des marchandises – Notion de “marchandises similaires” – Médicaments – Prise en compte de tout élément pouvant avoir une incidence sur la valeur économique du médicament concerné – Délai de 90 jours dans lequel les marchandises importées doivent être vendues dans l’Union européenne – Délai de rigueur – Absence de prise en compte des remises commerciales.#Affaire C-1/18.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60563

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#SIA 'Oribalt Rīga v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Article 30(2)(b) and (c) – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 152(1)(a) and (b) – Determination of the customs value of the goods – Definition of ‘similar goods’ – Medicinal products – Account taken of any factor that may have an impact on the economic value of the medicinal product concerned – Time limit of 90 days within which the imported goods must be sold in the European Union – Mandatory time limit – No account taken of trade discounts.#Case C-1/18.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60564

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 20 June 2019.#Adriano Guaitoli and Others v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Roma.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 7(1)(a) — Competent court in matters relating to a contract — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Articles 5, 7, 9 and 12 — Montreal Convention — Jurisdiction — Articles 19 and 33 — Application for compensation and compensation for damage resulting from the cancellation and delay of flights.#Case C-213/18.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60565

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 20 June 2019.#Prato Nevoso Termo Energy Srl v Provincia di Cuneo and ARPA Piemonte.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Piemonte.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2008/98/EC — Waste — Used vegetable oils having undergone chemical treatment — Article 6(1) and (4) — End-of-waste status — Directive 2009/28/EC — Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources — Article 13 — National authorisation, certification and licensing procedures that are applied to plants for the production of electricity, heating or cooling from renewable energy sources — Use of a bioliquid as a power source for an electric power plant.#Case C-212/18.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60566

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 20 June 2019.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the ordinary Polish courts — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond the newly set age, by authorisation of the Minister for Justice — Article 157 TFEU — Directive 2006/54/EC — Articles 5(a) and 9(1)(f) — Prohibition of discrimination based on sex in matters of pay, employment and occupation — Establishment of different retirement ages for men and women holding the position of judge of the ordinary Polish courts or of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) or that of public prosecutor in Poland.#Case C-192/18.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60567

Case C-475/18: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — SATI - Societa Autocooperative Trasporti Italiani SpA v Aziendo di Trasporti Molisana — SpA (ATM) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services — Article 5 — Direct award of public service contracts — Prohibited by national law — Article 8(2) — Transitional arrangements)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60568

Case C-424/18: Order of the Court of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Veneto — Italy) — Italy Emergenza Cooperativa Sociale, Associazione Volontaria di Pubblica Assistenza ‘Croce Verde’ v ULSS 5 Polesana Rovigo, Regione del Veneto (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement of supplies, works or services — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 10(h) — Specific exclusions for service contracts — Patient transport ambulance services — Concept)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60569

Case C-322/18: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Schiaffini Travel SpA v Comune di Latina (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 5 — Award of public service contracts — Article 5(2) — Direct award — Definition of ‘internal operator’ — Article 8(2) — Transitional arrangements)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60570

Case C-404/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen — Belgium) –Tine Vandenbon, Jamina Hakelbracht, Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van Vrouwen en Mannen v WTG Retail BVBA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment of men and women — Access to employment and working conditions — Article 24 — Protection against retaliatory measures — Rejection of a candidate due to her pregnancy — Employee intervening in favour of that candidate — Dismissal of that employee)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60571

Case C-291/18: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel București — Romania) — Grup Servicii Petroliere SA v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Soluționare a Contestațiilor, Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală — Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 148(a) and (c) — Exemptions related to international transport — Supply of offshore jackup drilling rigs — Concept of ‘vessels used for navigation on the high seas’ — Scope)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60572

Case C-100/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Línea Directa Aseguradora, SA v Segurcaixa, Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2009/103/EC — Article 3, first paragraph — Concept of ‘use of vehicles’ — Damage to property as a result of a fire in a vehicle parked in the private garage of the property — Compulsory insurance cover)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60573

Case C-72/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Contencioso-Administrativo de Pamplona — Spain) — Daniel Ustariz Aróstegui v Departamento de Educación del Gobierno de Navarra (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4(1) — Principle of non-discrimination — Public sector education — National provision granting particular additional remuneration only to teachers employed for an indefinite duration as established public officials — Exclusion of teachers employed under a fixed-term contract governed by public law — Concept of ‘objective grounds’ - Characteristics inherent in the status of established public official)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60574

Case C-1/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa — Latvia) — ‘Oribalt Rīga’ SIA, formerly ‘Oriola Rīga’ SIA v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 30(2)(b) and (c) — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 152(1)(a) and (b) — Determination of the customs value of the goods — Definition of ‘similar goods’ — Medicinal products — Account taken of any factor that may have an impact on the economic value of the medicinal product concerned — Time-limit of 90 days in which the imported goods must be sold in the European Union — Mandatory time-limit — No account taken of trade discounts)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60575

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#a&o hostel and hotel Berlin GmbH, successor in law to A & O Hotel and Hostel Friedrichshain GmbH v European Commission.#State aid — Operating aid — Youth hostel in Berlin — Rent-free use of a publicly owned property — Decision declaring the potential aid compatible with the internal market — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Serious difficulties.#Case T-578/17.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60576

Case T-578/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 June 2019 — a&o hostel and hotel Berlin v Commission (State aid — Operating aid — Youth hostel in Berlin — Rent-free use of a publicly owned property — Decision declaring the potential aid compatible with the internal market — Article 107(3)(c) TFEU — Serious difficulties)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60577

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 20 juin 2019.#ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH contre Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Environnement – Directive 2003/87/CE – Système d’échange de quotas d’émission de gaz à effet de serre – Installation de traitement de gaz naturel – Récupération de soufre – “Procédé Claus” – Production d’électricité dans un dispositif auxiliaire – Production de chaleur – Émission de dioxyde de carbone (CO2) intrinsèque – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Champ d’application – Annexe I – Activité de “combustion de combustibles” – Article 3, sous u) – Notion de “producteur d’électricité” – Article 10 bis, paragraphes 3 et 4 – Régime transitoire d’allocation harmonisée de quotas d’émission à titre gratuit – Décision 2011/278/UE – Champ d’application – Article 3, sous c) – Notion de “sous-installation avec référentiel de chaleur”.#Affaire C-682/17.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60578

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019.#ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Natural gas processing installation — Sulphur recovery — ‘Claus process’ — Production of electricity in a secondary facility — Production of heat — Emission of inherent carbon dioxide (CO2) — Article 2(1) — Scope — Annex I — Activity of ‘combustion of fuels’ — Article 3(u) — Concept of ‘electricity generator’ — Article 10a(3) and (4) — Transitional arrangements for the harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Decision 2011/278/EU — Scope — Article 3(c) — Concept of ‘heat benchmark sub-installation’.#Case C-682/17.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60579

Case C-682/17: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — Natural gas processing installation — Sulphur recovery — ‘Claus process’ — Production of electricity in a secondary facility — Production of heat — Emission of inherent carbon dioxide (CO2) — Article 2(1) — Scope — Annex I — Activity of ‘combustion of fuels’ — Article 3(u) — Concept of ‘electricity generator’ — Article 10a(3) and (4) — Transitional arrangements for the harmonised free allocation of emission allowances — Decision 2011/278/EU — Scope — Article 3(c) — Concept of ‘heat benchmark sub-installation’)

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.

60580

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 20 juin 2019.#Procédure pénale contre K.P.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique étrangère et de sécurité commune – Lutte contre le terrorisme – Mesures restrictives prises à l’encontre de certaines personnes et entités – Gel des fonds – Position commune 2001/931/PESC – Article 1er, paragraphes 4 et 6 – Règlement (CE) no 2580/2001 – Article 2, paragraphe 3 – Décision du Conseil maintenant une organisation sur la liste de personnes, groupes et entités impliqués dans des actes de terrorisme – Validité.#Affaire C-458/15.

cjeu_case · 20 июня 2019 г.