Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317,024 documents
59181

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#European Commission v Italian Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Protection of plant health – Directive 2000/29/EC – Protection against the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of organisms harmful to plants or plant products – Article 16(1) and (3) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 – Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the European Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells et al.) – Article 7(2)(c) – Containment measures – Obligation to remove immediately infected plants in a 20 km strip in the infected zone – Article 7(7) – Obligation to monitor – Annual surveys – Article 6(2), (7) and (9) – Eradication measures – Persistent and general failure to fulfil obligations – Article 4(3) TEU – Obligation of sincere cooperation.#Case C-443/18.

cjeu_case ·
59183

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#AW and Others v Lietuvos valstybė and Lietuvos valstybė.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2002/22/EC — Universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services — Article 26(5) — Single European emergency call number — Making available caller location information.#Case C-417/18.

cjeu_case ·
59184

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 5 septembre 2019.#Procédure pénale contre AH e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive (UE) 2016/343 – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Présomption d’innocence – Références publiques à la culpabilité – Accord conclu entre le procureur et l’auteur d’une infraction – Jurisprudenc.e nationale prévoyant l’identification des personnes poursuivies n’ayant pas conclu un tel accord – Charte des droits fondamentaux – Article 48.#Affaire C-377/18.

cjeu_case ·
59185

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#Criminal proceedings against AH and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 4(1) — Presumption of innocence — Public references to guilt — Agreement concluded between the prosecutor and the perpetrator of an offence — National case-law providing for the identification of accused persons who have not concluded such an agreement — Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 48.#Case C-377/18.

cjeu_case ·
59186

Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 5 septembre 2019.#Lombardi Srl contre Comune di Auletta e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédures de recours en matière de passation de marchés publics de fournitures et de travaux – Directive 89/665/CEE – Recours en annulation contre la décision d’attribution d’un marché public introduit par un soumissionnaire dont l’offre n’a pas été retenue – Recours incident de l’adjudicataire – Recevabilité du recours principal en cas de bien-fondé du recours incident.#Affaire C-333/18.

cjeu_case ·
59187

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#Lombardi Srl v Comune di Auletta and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Review procedures on the award of public supply and public works contracts — Directive 89/665/EEC — Action for annulment of the decision awarding a public contract by a tenderer whose bid was unsuccessful — Counterclaim brought by the successful tenderer — Admissibility of the main action in the event that the counterclaim is well founded.#Case C-333/18.

cjeu_case ·
59188

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 septembre 2019.#TE contre Pohotovosť s.r.o.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 2008/48/CE – Protection des consommateurs – Crédit aux consommateurs – Article 10, paragraphe 2, sous h) et i), et paragraphe 3 – Informations à mentionner dans le contrat – Législation nationale prévoyant l’obligation de préciser pour chaque paiement la répartition entre le remboursement du capital, les intérêts et les frais.#Affaire C-331/18.

cjeu_case ·
59189

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#TE v Pohotovosť s.r.o.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2008/48/EC — Consumer protection — Consumer credit — Article 10(2)(h) and (i) and Article 10(3) — Information to be included in the agreement — National legislation laying down an obligation to specify for each payment the distribution between the repayment of capital, interest and charges.#Case C-331/18.

cjeu_case ·
59190

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Wild fauna and flora — Conservation of natural habitats as well as wild fauna and flora — Article 4(4) — Annexes I and II — Sites of Community importance — Non-designation — Special areas of conservation — Necessary measures — Failure to adopt.#Case C-290/18.

cjeu_case ·
59191

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#European Commission v Portuguese Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Wild fauna and flora — Conservation of natural habitats as well as wild fauna and flora — Article 4(4) — Annexes I and II — Sites of Community importance — Non-designation — Special areas of conservation — Necessary measures — Failure to adopt.#Case C-290/18.

cjeu_case ·
59192

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#AMS Neve Ltd and Others v Heritage Audio SL and Pedro Rodríguez Arribas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 97(5) — Jurisdiction — Infringement proceedings — Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which ‘the act of infringement has been committed’ — Advertising and offers for sale displayed on a website and on social media platforms.#Case C-172/18.

cjeu_case ·
59193

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#AMS Neve Ltd and Others v Heritage Audio SL and Pedro Rodríguez Arribas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 97(5) — Jurisdiction — Infringement proceedings — Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which ‘the act of infringement has been committed’ — Advertising and offers for sale displayed on a website and on social media platforms.#Case C-172/18.

cjeu_case ·
59194

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 5 septembre 2019.#Regards Photographiques SARL contre Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 103, paragraphe 2, sous a) – Article 311, paragraphe 1, point 2 – Annexe IX, partie A, point 7 – Taux réduit de TVA – Objets d’art – Notion – Photographies prises par l’artiste, tirées par lui ou sous son contrôle, signées et numérotées dans la limite de trente exemplaires – Réglementation nationale limitant l’application du taux réduit de TVA aux seules photographies présentant un caractère artistique.#Affaire C-145/18.

cjeu_case ·
59195

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#Regards Photographiques SARL v Ministre de l'Action et des Comptes publics.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 103(2)(a) — Article 311(1), point 2 — Annex IX, Part A, point 7 — Reduced rate of VAT — Works of art — Concept — Photographs taken by the artist, printed by him or under his supervision, signed and numbered and limited to 30 copies — National legislation restricting the application of the reduced rate of VAT only to photographs that have artistic character.#Case C-145/18.

cjeu_case ·
59197

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 September 2019.#Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Deutsche Bahn AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro — Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 — Single euro payments area (SEPA) — Payment by direct debit — Article 9(2) — Accessibility of payments — Residence condition.#Case C-28/18.

cjeu_case ·
59198

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 5 September 2019.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2008/98/EC — Articles 30 and 33 — Waste management plans — Autonomous Communities of the Balearic Islands and the Canary Islands (Spain) — Obligation to revise — Obligation to notify the Commission — No proper formal notice — Letter of formal notice sent prematurely — Inadmissibility.#Case C-642/18.

cjeu_case ·
59199

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 September 2019.#TB v Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Immigration policy — Right to family reunification — Directive 2003/86/EC — Article 10(2) — Optional provision — Prerequisites for exercising the right to family reunification — Member of a refugee’s family not referred to in Article 4 — Concept of a ‘dependant’.#Case C-519/18.

cjeu_case ·
59200

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 5 September 2019.#Brussels Securities SA v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States — Directive 90/435/EEC — Prevention of double taxation — First indent of Article 4(1) — Prohibition on taxing profits received — Inclusion of the dividend distributed by the subsidiary in the parent company’s tax base — Deduction of the dividend distributed from the parent company’s tax base and the indefinite carrying forward of the surplus to the following tax years — The order in which tax deductions on profits are to be applied — Loss of a tax advantage.#Case C-389/18.

cjeu_case ·