Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161375) cjeu_case (104317) decision (43264) directive (8068)
317 024 документа
57481

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Extracts).#Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/18.

cjeu_case ·
57482

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019 (Extracts).#Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-380/18.

cjeu_case ·
57485

Case T-380/18: Judgment of the General Court of 7 November 2019 — Intas Pharmaceuticals v EUIPO — Laboratorios Indas (INTAS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark INTAS — Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs and of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case ·
57486

Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#K.H.K. contre B.A.C. et E.E.K.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Règlement (UE) no 655/2014 – Ordonnance européenne de saisie conservatoire des comptes bancaires – Article 5, sous a) – Procédure d’obtention – Article 4, points 8 à 10 – Notions de “décision”, de “transaction judiciaire” et d’“acte authentique” – Ordonnance nationale d’injonction de payer susceptible d’opposition – Article 18, paragraphe 1 – Délais – Article 45 – Circonstances exceptionnelles – Notion.#Affaire C-555/18.

cjeu_case ·
57487

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#K.H.K. v B.A.C. and E.E.K.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 655/2014 — European Account Preservation Order — Article 5(a) — Obtention procedure –Article 4(8) to (10) — Definition of ‘judgment’, ‘court settlement’ and ‘authentic instrument’ — National order for payment against which an objection may be lodged — Article 18(1) — Time limits — Article 45 — Exceptional circumstances — Definition.#Case C-555/18.

cjeu_case ·
57488

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Profi Credit Polska S.A. contre Bogumiła Włostowska e.a. et Profi Credit Polska S.A. contre OH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des consommateurs – Directive 93/13/CEE – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Article 6, paragraphe 1 – Article 7, paragraphe 1 – Directive 2008/48/CE – Article 10, paragraphe 2 – Contrats de crédit aux consommateurs – Licéité de la garantie de la créance issue de ce contrat par un billet à ordre émis en blanc – Demande de paiement de la dette cambiaire – Étendue de l’office du juge.#Affaires jointes C-419/18 et C-483/18.

cjeu_case ·
57489

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Profi Credit Polska S.A. v Bogumiła Włostowska and Others and Profi Credit Polska S.A. v OH.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy Pragi-Południe w Warszawie and Sąd Okręgowy w Opolu, II Wydział Cywilny Odwoławczy.#References for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 3(1) — Article 6(1) — Article 7(1) — Directive 2008/48/EC — Article 10(2) — Credit agreements for consumers — Lawfulness of securing the debt arising under the agreement by means of a blank promissory note — Demand for payment of the debt owed under the promissory note — Scope of the court’s powers and obligations.#Joined Cases C-419/18 and C-483/18.

cjeu_case ·
57490

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Gennaro Cafaro contre DQ.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Transports aériens – Règlement (UE) no 1178/2011 – Annexe I, point FCL.065 – Champ d’application ratione temporis – Directive 2000/78/CE – Égalité de traitement en matière d’emploi et de travail – Discrimination fondée sur l’âge – Article 2, paragraphe 5 – Article 4, paragraphe 1 – Réglementation nationale prévoyant la cessation automatique de la relation de travail à l’âge de 60 ans – Pilotes d’aéronefs – Protection de la sécurité nationale.#Affaire C-396/18.

cjeu_case ·
57491

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Gennaro Cafaro v DQ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 – Annex I, Point FCL.065 – Scope ratione temporis – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Discrimination on grounds of age – Article 2(5) – Article 4(1) – National legislation providing for the automatic termination of the employment relationship at the age of 60 – Aircraft pilots – Protection of national security.#Case C-396/18.

cjeu_case ·
57492

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Eni SpA contre Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico et Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze et Shell Italia E & P SpA contre Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Directive 94/22/CE – Énergie – Conditions d’octroi et d’exercice des autorisations de prospecter, d’exploiter et d’extraire des hydrocarbures – Redevances – Méthodes de calcul – Indices QE et Pfor – Caractère discriminatoire.#Affaires jointes C-364/18 et C-365/18.

cjeu_case ·
57493

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Eni SpA and Shell Italia E & P SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia and Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 94/22/EC — Energy — Conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons — Royalties — Methods of calculation — QE and PFOR indices — Discriminatory nature.#Joined Cases C-364/18 and C-365/18.

cjeu_case ·
57494

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Article 3(8) — Transport contract — Concept — Passenger without a ticket at the time of boarding a train — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 6(1) — General conditions of carriage of a railway undertaking — Mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Penalty clause — Powers of the national court.#Joined Cases C-349/18 to C-351/18.

cjeu_case ·
57495

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen.#References for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Article 3(8) — Transport contract — Concept — Passenger without a ticket at the time of boarding a train — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 6(1) — General conditions of carriage of a railway undertaking — Mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Penalty clause — Powers of the national court.#Joined Cases C-349/18 to C-351/18.

cjeu_case ·
57496

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Rose Vision, SL v European Commission.#Appeal — Projects financed by the European Union in the area of research — Seventh Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM, sISI, 4NEM and SFERA projects — Audits finding irregularities in the implementation of certain projects — European Commission decisions suspending payment of the amounts payable under other projects — Action for compensation and annulment.#Case C-346/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
57497

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Rose Vision, SL v European Commission.#Appeal — Projects financed by the European Union in the area of research — Seventh Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Grant agreements relating to the FIRST, FutureNEM, sISI, 4NEM and SFERA projects — Audits finding irregularities in the implementation of certain projects — European Commission decisions suspending payment of the amounts payable under other projects — Action for compensation and annulment.#Case C-346/18 P.

cjeu_case ·
57499

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Alain Flausch and Others v Ypourgos Perivallontos kai Energeias and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Public participation in decision-making and access to justice — Date from which the time for bringing proceedings starts to run.#Case C-280/18.

cjeu_case ·
57500

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 7 novembre 2019.#Adriano Guaitoli e.a. contre easyJet Airline Co. Ltd.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 7, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Juridiction compétente en matière contractuelle – Règles communes en matière d’indemnisation et d’assistance des passagers en cas de refus d’embarquement et d’annulation ou de retard important d’un vol – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Articles 5, 7, 9 et 12 – Convention de Montréal – Compétence – Articles 19 et 33 – Demande d’indemnisation et de réparation du préjudice résultant de l’annulation et du retard de vols.#Affaire C-213/18.

cjeu_case ·