Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161354) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43245) directive (8067)
316,981 documents
50827

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-240/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
50828

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-240/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
50829

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-239/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
50830

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2020.#Giorgio Armani SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-239/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
50831

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2020.#JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts – Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts – Whether permissible.#Case C-135/20.

cjeu_case ·
50832

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2020.#JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 5 – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Successive contracts – Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts – Whether permissible.#Case C-135/20.

cjeu_case ·
50837

Case C-135/20: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 September 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — JS v Câmara Municipal de Gondomar (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5 — Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector — Successive contracts — Prohibition on converting fixed-term contracts to open-ended contracts — Whether permissible)

cjeu_case ·
50840

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 30 septembre 2020.#LM contre Centre public d'action sociale de Seraing.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice – Directive 2008/115/CE – Retour des ressortissants de pays tiers en séjour irrégulier – Parent d’un enfant majeur atteint d’une grave maladie – Décision de retour – Recours juridictionnel – Effet suspensif de plein droit – Garanties dans l’attente du retour – Besoins de base – Articles 7, 19 et 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-402/19.

cjeu_case ·