Документы: Европейский Союз

49661

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-378/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49662

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-378/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49663

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-377/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49664

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-377/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49665

Case T-664/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Allergan Holdings France v EUIPO — Dermavita (JUVEDERM ULTRA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49666

Case T-643/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark JUVEDERM ULTRA — Genuine use of the mark — Use in connection with the goods in respect of which the mark was registered — Use in the form in which the mark was registered — Use with the proprietor’s consent — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49667

Case T-574/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO — Mystic Products and Koopman International (Fluid distribution equipment) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered community design representing fluid distribution equipment — Ground for invalidity — Non-compliance with requirements for protection — Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function — Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49668

Case T-378/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Topcart v EUIPO — Carl International (TC CARL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark TC CARL — Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49669

Case T-377/19: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — Topcart v EUIPO — Carl International (TC CARL) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark TC CARL — Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49670

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 novembre 2020.#Ryanair DAC contre DelayFix.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Contrat de transport aérien – Clause attributive de juridiction contractée par le passager ayant la qualité de consommateur – Créance de ce passager à l’égard de la compagnie aérienne – Cession de cette créance à une société de recouvrement de créances – Opposabilité de la clause attributive de juridiction par la compagnie aérienne à la société cessionnaire de la créance dudit passager – Directive 93/13/CEE.#Affaire C-519/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49671

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Ryanair DAC v DelayFix.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Contract of transport by air – Jurisdiction clause agreed to by the passenger as a consumer – Claim made by the passenger against the airline – Assignment of that claim to a collection agency – Enforceability of the jurisdiction clause by the airline against the assignee company of that passenger’s claim – Directive 93/13/EEC.#Case C-519/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49672

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 18 novembre 2020.#Syndicat CFTC du personnel de la Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de la Moselle contre Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de Moselle.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Directive 2006/54/CE – Égalité des chances et égalité de traitement entre hommes et femmes en matière d’emploi et de travail – Articles 14 et 28 – Convention collective nationale octroyant le droit à un congé consécutif au congé légal de maternité pour les travailleuses élevant elles-mêmes leur enfant – Exclusion du droit à ce congé pour les travailleurs de sexe masculin – Protection de la travailleuse au regard tant des conséquences de la grossesse que de sa condition de maternité – Conditions d’application.#Affaire C-463/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49673

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Syndicat CFTC du personnel de la Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de la Moselle v Caisse primaire d’assurance maladie de Moselle.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil de prud'hommes de Metz.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 2006/54/EC – Equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in employment and occupation – Articles 14 and 28 – National collective agreement granting the right to leave following the statutory maternity leave for female workers who bring up their children on their own – Exclusion of male workers from the right to that leave – Protection of female workers as regards both the consequences of pregnancy and the condition of maternity – Conditions under which applicable.#Case C-463/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49674

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 170 and Article 171(1) – VAT refund to taxable persons who are not established in the Member State in which they purchase goods and services or import goods subject to VAT but who are established in another Member State – Directive 2008/9/EC – Rules for the refund of VAT – Articles 9 and 10 – Article 15(1) – Article 20 – No copy of an invoice or an importation document – Systematic rejection of incomplete refund applications – Refusal to ask the taxable person to complete the application after the expiry of the time limit for submitting an application – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Principle of proportionality – Admissibility.#Case C-371/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49675

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 170 and Article 171(1) – VAT refund to taxable persons who are not established in the Member State in which they purchase goods and services or import goods subject to VAT but who are established in another Member State – Directive 2008/9/EC – Rules for the refund of VAT – Articles 9 and 10 – Article 15(1) – Article 20 – No copy of an invoice or an importation document – Systematic rejection of incomplete refund applications – Refusal to ask the taxable person to complete the application after the expiry of the time limit for submitting an application – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Principle of proportionality – Admissibility.#Case C-371/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49676

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 18 novembre 2020.#Techbau SpA contre Azienda Sanitaria Locale AL.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Lutte contre le retard de paiement dans les transactions commerciales – Directive 2000/35/CE – Notion de “transaction commerciale” – Notions de “fourniture de marchandises” et de “prestation de services” – Article 1er et article 2, point 1, premier alinéa – Marché public de travaux.#Affaire C-299/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49677

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Techbau SpA v Azienda Sanitaria Locale AL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Torino.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payments in commercial transactions – Directive 2000/35/EC – Concept of ‘commercial transactions’ – Concepts of ‘delivery of goods’ and ‘provision of services’ – Article 1 and first subparagraph of Article 2(1) – Public works contract.#Case C-299/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49678

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación S.A. v Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI) and Artistas e Intérpretes o Ejecutantes, Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Rights related to copyright – Directive 92/100/EEC – Article 8(2) – Directive 2006/115/EC – Article 8(2) – Communication to the public of an audiovisual work incorporating a phonogram or a reproduction of a phonogram – Single equitable remuneration.#Case C-147/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49679

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2020.#Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación S.A. v Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI) and Artistas e Intérpretes o Ejecutantes, Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Rights related to copyright – Directive 92/100/EEC – Article 8(2) – Directive 2006/115/EC – Article 8(2) – Communication to the public of an audiovisual work incorporating a phonogram or a reproduction of a phonogram – Single equitable remuneration.#Case C-147/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.

49680

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 18 novembre 2020.#Kaplan International colleges UK Ltd contre The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Fiscalité – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 132, paragraphe 1, sous f) – Exonération des prestations de services fournies par des groupements autonomes de personnes à leurs membres – Applicabilité aux groupements TVA – Article 11 – Groupement TVA.#Affaire C-77/19.

cjeu_case · 18 ноября 2020 г.