Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
43121

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#D.P.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Łodzi-Śródmieścia w Łodzi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Mutual recognition – Financial penalties – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Grounds for non-recognition and non-execution – Article 20(3) – Decision imposing a financial penalty – Observance of the rights of the defence – Notification of documents in a language not understood by the sentenced person – Translation of the essential elements of the decision.#Case C-338/20.

cjeu_case ·
43122

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#SIA 'MONO' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Excise duty – Directive 2008/118/EC – Exemption from the harmonised excise duty – Goods intended to be used in the context of diplomatic and consular relations – Conditions for the exemption to apply laid down by the host Member State – Payment by non-cash means.#Case C-326/20.

cjeu_case ·
43123

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 2 September 2021.#VB v Glavna direktsia 'Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Lukovit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 8 – Article 12(а) – Articles 20 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Reduction of the normal duration of night work in relation to day work – Public-sector workers and private-sector workers – Equal treatment.#Case C-262/20.

cjeu_case ·
43124

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 2 September 2021.#Eurofer, Association Européenne de l'Acier, AISBL v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel originating in Brazil, Iran, Russia, Serbia and Ukraine – Termination of the proceedings against imports originating in Serbia – Determination of injury – Cumulative assessment of the effects of imports from more than one third country – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 3(4) – Termination of the proceedings without measures – Article 9(2) – ‘Negligible’ imports – De minimis threshold – European Commission’s discretion.#Case C-226/20 P.

cjeu_case ·
43125

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Alba Iulia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 4(1)(a) and (c) and Article 4(2)(b) – National legislation making direct support conditional on the farmer keeping his own animals – Article 9(1) – Concept of ‘active farmer’ – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 60 – Circumvention clause – Concept of ‘artificially created conditions’.#Case C-176/20.

cjeu_case ·
43126

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#SIA 'SS' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā apgabaltiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2 – Scope – Article 4 – Concept of ‘processing’ – Article 5 – Principles relating to processing – Purpose limitation – Data minimisation – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Processing necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest by the controller – Processing necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject – Article 23 – Limitations – Processing of data for tax purposes – Request for the disclosure of information relating to vehicle sale advertisements placed online – Proportionality.#Case C-175/20.

cjeu_case ·
43127

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Cartel prosecuted by two national competition authorities – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-151/20.

cjeu_case ·
43128

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#A v O and G.W. and E..S. v A. Towarzystwo Ubezpieczeń Życie S.A.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Direct life assurance – ‘Unit-linked’ open-ended group endowment and life assurance contracts – Directive 2002/83/EC – Article 36 – Directive 2002/92/EC – Article 12(3) – Pre-contractual information disclosure – Information as to the nature of the underlying assets of ‘unit-linked’ assurance contracts – Field of application – Scope – Directive 2005/29/EC – Article 7 – Unfair commercial practices – Misleading omission.#Joined Cases C-143/20 and C-213/20.

cjeu_case ·
43129

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 September 2021.#bpost SA v Autorité belge de la concurrence.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Postal services – Tariff system adopted by a universal service provider – Fine imposed by a national postal regulator – Fine imposed by a national competition authority – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Non bis in idem principle – Existence of the same offence – Article 52(1) – Limitations to the non bis in idem principle – Duplication of proceedings and penalties – Conditions – Pursuit of an objective of general interest – Proportionality.#Case C-117/20.

cjeu_case ·
43130

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#SC Avio Lucos SRL v Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură – Centrul judeţean Dolj and Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură (APIA) – Aparat Central.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Direct support schemes – Common rules – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘agricultural activity’ – Article 35 – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – National legislation requiring the production of a legal document establishing the right to use the agricultural parcel made available to the farmer under a concession contract and making the validity of such a contract conditional on the future concessionaire having the status of breeder or owner of animals – Concessionaire of an area of pastureland who has concluded a cooperation contract with animal breeders – Res judicata.#Case C-116/20.

cjeu_case ·
43131

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 September 2021.#Vinařství U Kapličky s.r.o. v Státní zemědělská a potravinářská inspekce.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Brně.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products – Wine – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Rules concerning marketing – Article 80 – Oenological practices – Prohibition on marketing – Article 90 – Imports of wine – Regulation (EC) No 555/2008 – Article 43 – V I 1 document – Certificate of production of consignments of wine in accordance with recommended or authorised oenological practices – Probative value – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 89(4) – Penalties – Marketing of wine from a third country – Wine having undergone unauthorised oenological practices – Exoneration from liability – Burden of proof.#Case C-86/20.

cjeu_case ·
43132

Case C-502/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — TP v Institut des Experts en Automobiles (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Recognition of professional qualifications — Directive 2005/36/EC — Article 5(2) — Automotive expert established in one Member State who moves to the territory of the host Member State in order to pursue, on a temporary and occasional basis, his profession — Refusal of the professional body of the host Member State, in which he was previously established, to enter him in the register of temporary and occasional service providers — Concept of ‘temporary and occasional provision of services’)

cjeu_case ·
43133

Case C-379/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret — Denmark) — B v Udlændingenævnet (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Decision No 1/80 — Article 13 — Standstill clause — New restriction — Family reunification of minor children of Turkish workers — Age condition — Requirement of compelling reasons in order to be granted family reunification — Overriding reason in the public interest — Successful integration — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
43134

Case C-371/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Peek & Cloppenburg KG, legally represented by Peek & Cloppenburg Düsseldorf Komplementär BV v Peek & Cloppenburg KG, legally represented by Van Graaf Management GmbH (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 2005/29/EC — Unfair commercial practices — Commercial practices deemed to be unfair in all circumstances — Misleading commercial practices — First sentence of point 11 of Annex I — Advertising campaigns — Use of editorial content in the media to promote a product — Promotion financed by the trader itself — Concept of ‘payment’ — Promotion of sales of the products of the media operator company and of the trader — Advertorial)

cjeu_case ·
43135

Case C-350/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale — Italy) — O.D. and Others v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2011/98/EU — Rights for third-country workers who hold single permits — Article 12 — Right to equal treatment — Social security — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Coordination of social security systems — Article 3 — Maternity and paternity benefits — Family benefits — Legislation of a Member State excluding third-country nationals holding a single permit from entitlement to a childbirth allowance and a maternity allowance)

cjeu_case ·
43136

Case C-337/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — DM, LR v Caisse régionale de Crédit agricole mutuel (CRCAM) — Alpes-Provence (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Articles 58 and 60 — Payment service user — Notification of unauthorised payment transactions — Liability of the payment service provider for those transactions — Action for liability brought by the guarantor of a payment service user)

cjeu_case ·
43137

Case C-180/20: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 2 September 2021 — European Commission v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Decisions (EU) 2020/245 and 2020/246 — Position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Council established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part — Agreement, certain provisions of which may be linked with the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the Partnership Council, of the Partnership Committee, subcommittees and other bodies — Adoption of two separate decisions — Choice of legal basis — Article 37 TEU — Article 218(9) TFEU — Voting rules)

cjeu_case ·
43138

Case C-169/20: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 110 TFEU — Internal taxation — Discriminatory taxation — Prohibition — Second-hand vehicles imported from other Member States — Component of the registration tax calculated on the basis of carbon dioxide emissions — Failure to take into account the depreciation of the vehicle)

cjeu_case ·
43139

Case C-66/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Procura della Repubblica di Trento — Italy) — Proceedings relating to the recognition and execution of a European Investigation Order (EIO) concerning XK (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 267 TFEU — Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ — Criteria — Procura della Repubblica di Trento (Public Prosecutor’s Office, Trento, Italy) — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

cjeu_case ·
43140

Case C-34/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln — Germany) — Telekom Deutschland GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland, represented by the Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Electronic communications — Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 — Article 3 — Open internet access — Article 3(1) — End users’ rights — Article 3(2) — Prohibition of agreements and commercial practices limiting the exercise of end users’ rights — Article 3(3) — Obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic — Possibility of implementing reasonable traffic management measures — Additional ‘zero tariff’ option — Limitation on bandwidth)

cjeu_case ·