Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 947 documents
42741

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Le-Vel – Earlier national word mark LEVEL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-331/20.

cjeu_case ·
42742

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Laboratorios Ern, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Le-Vel – Earlier national word mark LEVEL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity of the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-331/20.

cjeu_case ·
42743

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 September 2021.#MHCS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark depicting a shade of the colour orange – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Nature of the mark – Colour mark – Right to be heard – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-274/20.

cjeu_case ·
42744

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 September 2021.#MHCS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative EU mark depicting a shade of the colour orange – Absolute ground for refusal – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Nature of the mark – Colour mark – Right to be heard – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-274/20.

cjeu_case ·
42745

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Stavros Arnaoutakis and Others v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme – Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension – Plea of illegality – Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament – Rights acquired and future entitlements – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty.#Cases T-240/20 to T-245/20.

cjeu_case ·
42746

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Stavros Arnaoutakis and Others v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament – Amendment of the voluntary additional pension scheme – Refusal to grant a voluntary additional pension – Plea of illegality – Competence of the Bureau of the Parliament – Rights acquired and future entitlements – Proportionality – Equal treatment – Legal certainty.#Cases T-240/20 to T-245/20.

cjeu_case ·
42747

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS – Conditions of admissibility of the application for the declaration of invalidity – Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-207/20.

cjeu_case ·
42748

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Residencial Palladium, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark PALLADIUM HOTELS & RESORTS – Conditions of admissibility of the application for the declaration of invalidity – Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 60(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Article 56(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 63(3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-207/20.

cjeu_case ·
42749

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#French Republic v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substance evaluation – Aluminium chloride – Aluminium chloride, basic – Aluminium sulphate – ECHA decisions requesting further information – Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal – Multiple grounds for the decision of the Board of Appeal – Grounds capable of justifying the decision – Inoperative nature of the pleas directed against the other grounds.#Case T-127/20.

cjeu_case ·
42750

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#French Republic v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Substance evaluation – Aluminium chloride – Aluminium chloride, basic – Aluminium sulphate – ECHA decisions requesting further information – Article 46(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Appeal brought before the Board of Appeal – Multiple grounds for the decision of the Board of Appeal – Grounds capable of justifying the decision – Inoperative nature of the pleas directed against the other grounds.#Case T-127/20.

cjeu_case ·
42751

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-110/20.

cjeu_case ·
42752

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-110/20.

cjeu_case ·
42753

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-109/20.

cjeu_case ·
42754

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-109/20.

cjeu_case ·
42755

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-107/20.

cjeu_case ·
42756

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-107/20.

cjeu_case ·
42757

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-106/20.

cjeu_case ·
42758

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-106/20.

cjeu_case ·
42759

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-105/20.

cjeu_case ·
42760

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 September 2021.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures – Obligation to state reasons – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures – Right to private and family life – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-105/20.

cjeu_case ·