Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316,947 documents
42101

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Power Horse Energy Drinks GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark UNSTOPPABLE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-3/21.

cjeu_case ·
42102

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Power Horse Energy Drinks GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark UNSTOPPABLE – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-3/21.

cjeu_case ·
42104

Case T-3/21: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2021 — Power Horse Energy Drinks v EUIPO — Robot Energy Europe (UNSTOPPABLE) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark UNSTOPPABLE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Lack of descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case ·
42105

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2021.#FCA Italy SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-360/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
42106

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 6 October 2021.#FCA Italy SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170a of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-360/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
42107

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely – Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-316/21.

cjeu_case ·
42108

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 2014/24/EU – Conduct of the procedure – Choice of participants and award of contracts – Article 63 – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority – Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely – Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-316/21.

cjeu_case ·
42109

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#FI and RE v TUIfly GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5 – Article 7 – Article 8(3) – Denied boarding, cancellation or long delay of a flight – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Concept of ‘cancellation’ – Diversion of a flight to an airport not serving the same town, city or region as that for which the booking was made – Re-routing of passengers by coach.#Case C-253/21.

cjeu_case ·
42110

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#FI and RE v TUIfly GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5 – Article 7 – Article 8(3) – Denied boarding, cancellation or long delay of a flight – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Concept of ‘cancellation’ – Diversion of a flight to an airport not serving the same town, city or region as that for which the booking was made – Re-routing of passengers by coach.#Case C-253/21.

cjeu_case ·
42111

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 October 2021.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Interim relief – Order on interim measures – Article 163 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Change in circumstances – No such change – Jurisdiction of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Disciplinary regime applicable to the judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court), of the ordinary courts and of the administrative courts – Procedure for review of the conditions for the independence of those judges – Suspension of application of national provisions.#Case C-204/21 R.

cjeu_case ·
42112

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 6 October 2021.#Republic of Poland v European Commission.#Interim relief – Order on interim measures – Article 163 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Change in circumstances – No such change – Jurisdiction of the Izba Dyscyplinarna (Disciplinary Chamber) of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) – Disciplinary regime applicable to the judges of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court), of the ordinary courts and of the administrative courts – Procedure for review of the conditions for the independence of those judges – Suspension of application of national provisions.#Case C-204/21 R.

cjeu_case ·
42118

Case C-316/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Belgium) — Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 2014/24/EU — Conduct of the procedure — Choice of participants and award of contracts — Article 63 — Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting authority — Failure to meet the requirements relating to the technical and professional ability of the tenderer by the entity on whose capacities the tenderer intends to rely — Obligation to allow that tenderer to replace that entity — Principle of proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
42119

Case C-253/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 October 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — TUIfly GmbH v FI, RE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5 — Article 7 — Article 8(3) — Denied boarding, cancellation or long delay of a flight — Compensation and assistance to passengers — Concept of ‘cancellation’ — Diversion of a flight to an airport not serving the same town, city or region as that for which the booking was made — Re-routing of passengers by coach)

cjeu_case ·
42120

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2021.#NZ v European Commission.#Staff case – Officials – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/1/AD 10/18 – Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the competition reserve list – Obligation to state reasons – Secrecy of the proceedings of the selection board – Broad discretionary power of the selection board – Failure to communicate the intermediate marks and the weighting of the components of the oral test.#Case T-668/20.

cjeu_case ·