Документы: Европейский Союз

38601

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITADHA – Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-149/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38602

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#UGA Nutraceuticals Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITADHA – Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-149/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38603

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark apo-discounter.de – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-140/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38604

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Apologistics GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark apo-discounter.de – Partial revocation – Genuine use of the trade mark – Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use.#Case T-140/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38605

Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 2 mars 2022.#Banco de Investimento Global SA contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale EUROBIC – Marques de l’Union européenne figuratives antérieures BiG, BANCO BiG et BiGlobal TRADE – Marques nationales verbales antérieures BANCO BIG et figurative antérieure BANCO BiG – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 207/2009 [devenu article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001].#Affaire T-125/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38606

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Banco de Investimento Global SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark EUROBIC – Earlier EU figurative marks BiG, BANCO BiG and BiGlobal TRADE – Earlier national word marks BANCO BIG and earlier national figurative mark BANCO BiG – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-125/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38607

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Distintiva Solutions S. Coop. Pequeña v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Makeblock – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-86/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38608

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Distintiva Solutions S. Coop. Pequeña v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Makeblock – Absolute grounds for refusal – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public – Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-86/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38609

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an item of furniture – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata.#Case T-1/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38610

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Fabryki Mebli "Forte" S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an item of furniture – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Res judicata.#Case T-1/21.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38611

Case T-192/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Beta Sports (META) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark META — Earlier national word mark METALGIAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38612

Case T-171/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Ubisoft Entertainment v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (FOR HONOR) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FOR HONOR — Earlier EU word mark HONOR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38613

Case T-149/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITADHA — Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38614

Case T-140/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Apologistics v EUIPO — Kerckhoff (apo-discounter.de) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark apo-discounter.de — Partial revocation — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use)

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38615

Case T-125/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Banco de Investimento Global v EUIPO — Banco BIC Português (EUROBIC) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark EUROBIC — Earlier EU figurative marks BiG, BANCO BiG and BiGlobal TRADE — Earlier national word marks BANCO BIG and earlier national figurative mark BANCO BiG — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38616

Case T-86/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Distintiva Solutions v EUIPO — Makeblock (Makeblock) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Makeblock — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — No descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Mark not of such a nature as to mislead the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation 2017/1001))

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38617

Case T-1/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — Fabryki Mebli ‘Forte’ v EUIPO — Bog-Fran (Furniture) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an item of furniture — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Disclosure of the earlier design — Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision — Res judicata)

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38618

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Degode-Dermago Development GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Skinovea – Earlier national word mark SKINOREN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-715/20.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38619

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Degode-Dermago Development GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Skinovea – Earlier national word mark SKINOREN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-715/20.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.

38620

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2022.#Pluscard Service-Gesellschaft für Kreditkarten-Processing mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PLUSCARD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-669/20.

cjeu_case · 2 марта 2022 г.