Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104315) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316,947 documents
34181

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK "Azot" v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Dumping margin – Determination of the normal value – Adjustments – Construction of the export price – Fair comparison – Injury to the Union industry – Calculation of price undercutting – Sales between related companies – Causal link – Calculation of the injury margin – Injury elimination – ‘Lesser duty’ rule – Use of facts available.#Case T-865/19.

cjeu_case ·
34182

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK "Azot" v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Dumping margin – Determination of the normal value – Adjustments – Construction of the export price – Fair comparison – Injury to the Union industry – Calculation of price undercutting – Sales between related companies – Causal link – Calculation of the injury margin – Injury elimination – ‘Lesser duty’ rule – Use of facts available.#Case T-865/19.

cjeu_case ·
34183

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 – Article 3(1) to (3) and (5) to (8) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sales through related companies – Construction of the export price – Injury to the Union industry – Calculation of price undercutting – Causal link – Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Calculation of the injury margin – Injury elimination.#Case T-744/19.

cjeu_case ·
34184

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 – Article 3(1) to (3) and (5) to (8) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Sales through related companies – Construction of the export price – Injury to the Union industry – Calculation of price undercutting – Causal link – Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036 – Calculation of the injury margin – Injury elimination.#Case T-744/19.

cjeu_case ·
34185

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022 (Extracts).#Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission.#State aid – Coach and bus transport – Equipment loan and capital loans granted by the City of Helsinki – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Economic continuity – Procedural rights of interested parties – Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-603/19.

cjeu_case ·
34186

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022 (Extracts).#Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission.#State aid – Coach and bus transport – Equipment loan and capital loans granted by the City of Helsinki – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Economic continuity – Procedural rights of interested parties – Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-603/19.

cjeu_case ·
34187

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Helsingin kaupunki v European Commission.#State aid – Coach and bus transport – Equipment loan and capital loans granted by the City of Helsinki – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Existing aid – Advantage – Application of the private creditor criterion in a market economy test – Public status of the debtor – Taking into account an existing aid scheme – Application of the private investor criterion in a market economy test – Economic continuity – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Article 108(2) TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – General principles of EU law.#Case T-597/19.

cjeu_case ·
34188

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Helsingin kaupunki v European Commission.#State aid – Coach and bus transport – Equipment loan and capital loans granted by the City of Helsinki – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Existing aid – Advantage – Application of the private creditor criterion in a market economy test – Public status of the debtor – Taking into account an existing aid scheme – Application of the private investor criterion in a market economy test – Economic continuity – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Article 108(2) TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – General principles of EU law.#Case T-597/19.

cjeu_case ·
34192

Case T-865/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission (Dumping — Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Dumping margin — Determination of the normal value — Adjustments — Construction of the export price — Fair comparison — Injury to the Union industry — Calculation of price undercutting — Sales between related companies — Causal link — Calculation of the injury margin — Injury elimination — ‘Lesser duty’ rule — Use of facts available)

cjeu_case ·
34193

Case T-744/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Methanol Holdings (Trinidad) v Commission (Dumping — Imports of mixtures of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia, Trinidad and Tobago and the United States — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1688 — Article 3(1) to (3) and (5) to (8) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Sales through related companies — Construction of the export price — Injury to the Union industry — Calculation of price undercutting — Causal link — Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036 — Calculation of the injury margin — Injury elimination)

cjeu_case ·
34195

Case T-597/19: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (State aid — Coach and bus transport — Equipment loan and capital loans granted by the City of Helsinki — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Existing aid — Advantage — Application of the private creditor criterion in a market economy test — Public status of the debtor — Taking into account an existing aid scheme — Application of the private investor criterion in a market economy test — Economic continuity — Procedural rights of the interested parties — Article 108(2) TFEU — Obligation to state reasons — General principles of EU law)

cjeu_case ·
34196

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Smart mobile devices – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Concepts of multi-sided platform and market (‘ecosystem’) – Operating system (Google Android) – App store (Play Store) – Search and browser applications (Google Search and Chrome) – Agreements with device manufacturers and mobile network operators – Single and continuous infringement – Concepts of overall plan and conduct implemented in the context of the same infringement (product bundles, exclusivity payments and anti-fragmentation obligations) – Exclusionary effects – Rights of the defence – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-604/18.

cjeu_case ·
34197

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 September 2022.#Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Smart mobile devices – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Concepts of multi-sided platform and market (‘ecosystem’) – Operating system (Google Android) – App store (Play Store) – Search and browser applications (Google Search and Chrome) – Agreements with device manufacturers and mobile network operators – Single and continuous infringement – Concepts of overall plan and conduct implemented in the context of the same infringement (product bundles, exclusivity payments and anti-fragmentation obligations) – Exclusionary effects – Rights of the defence – Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T-604/18.

cjeu_case ·
34199

Case T-604/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2022 — Google and Alphabet v Commission (Google Android) (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Smart mobile devices — Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement — Concepts of multi-sided platform and market (‘ecosystem’) — Operating system (Google Android) — App store (Play Store) — Search and browser applications (Google Search and Chrome) — Agreements with device manufacturers and mobile network operators — Single and continuous infringement — Concepts of overall plan and conduct implemented in the context of the same infringement (product bundles, exclusivity payments and anti-fragmentation obligations) — Exclusionary effects — Rights of the defence — Unlimited jurisdiction)

cjeu_case ·