Documents of European Union

316836 documents
303

Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#M.O.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Directive (UE) 2017/1132 – Publicité et actualisation des indications concernant les sociétés – Cessation des fonctions par des membres du conseil d’administration – Fondation – Inapplicabilité – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Absence de mise en œuvre du droit de l’Union – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-358/25.

cjeu_case ·
304

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA contre Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Réseaux et services de communications électroniques – Directive 2002/21/CE – Article 9 – Gestion des radiofréquences pour les services de communications électroniques – Principe de neutralité à l’égard des services – Article 9 bis – Réexamen des restrictions aux droits d’utilisation des radiofréquences existants – Mesure nationale imposant à un titulaire de droits d’utilisation de radiofréquences d’utiliser ces radiofréquences conformément aux dispositions du plan national d’attribution des fréquences et ne permettant pas d’exercer des activités différentes – Mesure nationale imposant d’utiliser lesdites radiofréquences exclusivement pour des services de diffusion de télévision numérique terrestre.#Affaire C-401/25.

cjeu_case ·
305

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Elettronica Industriale SpA v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directive 2002/21/EC – Article 9 – Radio spectrum management for electronic communications services – Principle of service neutrality – Article 9a – Review of restrictions on existing rights to use radio spectrum – A national measure requiring a holder of rights to use radio frequencies to use those frequencies in accordance with the provisions of the national frequency allocation plan and not permitting the pursuit of different activities – A national measure requiring the use of those radio frequencies exclusively for digital terrestrial television broadcasting services.#Case C-401/25.

cjeu_case ·
306

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1)(b) and Article 2(1)(d) – Restrictive measures taken against a natural person providing financial support to Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea or the destabilisation of Ukraine – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-400/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
307

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the military aggression against Ukraine – Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 1(1) in fine and Article 2(1) in fine – Restrictive measures imposed on a natural person associated with another natural person who is in turn subject to restrictive measures – Definition of ‘association’ in the case of two persons bound by a family relationship – Article 21 TFEU – Article 45(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Citizenship of the Union – Freedom of movement – Restrictive measures affecting the freedom of movement and residence of an EU citizen.#Case C-399/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
308

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Dana Astra IOOO v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Criterion for inclusion on those lists relating to the benefit derived from or the support provided to the Lukashenko regime – Maintenance of the appellant’s name on those lists – Belarusian company active in the property development and construction sector – Grounds for maintaining the listing – Sixth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Point from which time starts to run – Notification of the restrictive measures at issue to the appellant’s lawyers – Inadmissibility of the action on the ground that it was brought out of time – Examination of the merits of the action for reasons relating to the sound administration of justice – Plea in law alleging errors of assessment vitiating the grounds for maintaining the listing.#Case C-363/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
309

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Criminal proceedings against M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25.

cjeu_case ·
310

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea v M.G.D.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.#Case C-280/25.

cjeu_case ·
311

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Procédure disciplinaire – Révocation – Retrait de la décision de révocation pour vice de procédure – Nouvelle révocation – Composition du Tribunal de l’Union européenne – Prétendue absence d’impartialité – Offres de preuves – Actes frauduleux – Effets du retrait d’une décision – Réintégration du fonctionnaire sans son consentement – Composition de l’autorité investie du pouvoir de nomination – Prétendue absence d’impartialité.#Affaire C-169/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
312

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#QJ contre Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA (AEDT) et État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit à un recours effectif – Applicabilité – Réglementation nationale prévoyant un mécanisme de responsabilité solidaire du dirigeant d’une société pour le paiement de la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) due par cette société – Effet contraignant s’attachant aux constatations de fait et aux qualifications juridiques figurant dans l’avis d’imposition définitif – Faculté pour le dirigeant de contester, à titre incident, cet avis d’imposition émis à l’égard de ladite société – Respect des droits de la défense.#Affaire C-158/25.

cjeu_case ·
313

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#QJ v Administration de l'enregistrement, des domaines et de la TVA and État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Whether applicable – National legislation providing for a system of joint and several liability of company directors for payment of value added tax (VAT) owed by the company – Binding effect of the findings of fact and legal classifications contained in a final tax assessment – Option for the director to challenge the assessment issued against the company as an incidental question – Respect for the rights of the defence.#Case C-158/25.

cjeu_case ·
314

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#PV contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Pension d’ancienneté – Conditions d’octroi – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 77 – Durée minimale de service – Absences injustifiées ou irrégulières – Article 59, paragraphe 3 – Article 60 – Imputation des absences irrégulières ou injustifiées sur la durée du congé annuel – Conséquences en cas d’épuisement dudit congé – Perte du bénéfice de la rémunération pour la période correspondant aux absences irrégulières ou injustifiées – Privation de plein droit du bénéfice de l’acquisition de droits à pension d’ancienneté pour la période concernée.#Affaire C-133/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
315

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#Betaal Garant Nederland CV contre De Nederlandsche Bank NV.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Services de paiement dans le marché intérieur – Directive (UE) 2015/2366 – Article 4, point 3 – Notion de “service de paiement” – Article 4, point 24 – Notion de “virement” – Opération d’une entité intermédiaire effectuée au titre d’un contrat tripartite et consistant en la détention des fonds d’un client sur le compte bancaire de cette entité intermédiaire et le transfert de ces fonds à un entrepreneur après autorisation du client – Qualification de l’opération – Absence de “service de paiement”.#Affaire C-51/25.

cjeu_case ·
316

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Betaal Garant Nederland CV v De Nederlandsche Bank NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive (EU) 2015/2366 – Article 4(3) – Concept of a ‘payment service’ – Article 4(24) – Concept of ‘credit transfer’ – Transaction by an intermediary entity carried out under a tripartite agreement and consisting in the holding of client funds in a bank account of that intermediary entity and the transfer of those funds to a business owner, following the client’s authorisation – Classification of the transaction – Absence of a ‘payment service’.#Case C-51/25.

cjeu_case ·
317

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Decision 2012/642/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion and maintenance of the appellant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned by the restrictive measures – Criterion relating to benefiting from or supporting the regime of President Lukashenko.#Case C-39/25 P.

cjeu_case ·
318

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#SU and Others v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special protection areas – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project likely to have an effect on a protected site in view of that site’s conservation objectives – Screening – Conservation objectives specific to a special protection area not set.#Joined Cases C-27/25 and C-356/25.

cjeu_case ·
319

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#SU and Wild Ireland Defence CLG v An Coimisiún Pleanála, anciennement An Bord Pleanála and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Special protection areas – Appropriate assessment of the implications of a plan or project likely to have an effect on a protected site in view of that site’s conservation objectives – Screening – Conservation objectives specific to a special protection area not set.#Case C-27/25.

cjeu_case ·
320

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#PQ v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Alkotmányvédelmi Hivatal.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the European Union – Article 20 TFEU – Family member of a Union citizen who has never exercised his or her right of freedom of movement – Area of freedom, security and justice – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Threat to national security – Statement by a specialist national authority – Statement of reasons – Access to the file – Classified information – Primacy of EU law.#Case C-26/25.

cjeu_case ·