Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316 946 documents
31442

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Eurelec Trading SCRL and Scabel SA v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 1(1) – Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ – Action brought by a public authority seeking a declaration of the existence of restrictive practices, an order penalising those practices and an order that they cease.#Case C-98/22.

cjeu_case ·
31443

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Eurelec Trading SCRL and Scabel SA v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Paris.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 1(1) – Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ – Action brought by a public authority seeking a declaration of the existence of restrictive practices, an order penalising those practices and an order that they cease.#Case C-98/22.

cjeu_case ·
31446

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Syndicat Les Entreprises du Médicament (LEEM) v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 89/105/EEC – Transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems – Article 4 – Price freeze imposed on all medicinal products or on certain categories of medicinal products – National measure concerning only certain medicinal products, on an individual basis – Setting a maximum price for sales to health establishments of certain medicinal products.#Case C-20/22.

cjeu_case ·
31447

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#Syndicat Les Entreprises du Médicament (LEEM) v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 89/105/EEC – Transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems – Article 4 – Price freeze imposed on all medicinal products or on certain categories of medicinal products – National measure concerning only certain medicinal products, on an individual basis – Setting a maximum price for sales to health establishments of certain medicinal products.#Case C-20/22.

cjeu_case ·
31448

Case C-204/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Úrad pre verejné obstarávanie — Slovakia) — Úrad pre dohľad nad zdravotnou starostlivosťou, Všeobecná zdravotná poisťovňa, a.s., Dôvera zdravotná poist’ovňa a.s., Union zdravotná poisťovňa, a.s. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 267 TFEU — Concept of a ‘court or tribunal’ — Criteria relating to the constitution and function of that body — Exercise of judicial or administrative functions — Duty of cooperation of the body making the reference — Directives 89/665/EEC and 2014/24/EU — Public procurement — National regulatory body for public procurement procedures — Entitlement to act on an ex officio basis — Power to impose penalties — Decisions that are open to challenge before the courts — No dispute before the referring body — Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

cjeu_case ·
31449

Case C-82/22 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 — Jean-François Jalkh v European Parliament (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union — Third paragraph of Article 9 — Decision to waive parliamentary immunity — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

cjeu_case ·
31450

Case C-98/22: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris — France) — Eurelec Trading SCRL, Scabel SA v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 1(1) — Concept of ‘civil and commercial matters’ — Action brought by a public authority seeking a declaration of the existence of restrictive practices, an order penalising those practices and an order that they cease)

cjeu_case ·
31452

Case C-20/22: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 December 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Syndicat Les Entreprises du médicament (LEEM) v Ministre des Solidarités et de la Santé (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 89/105/EEC — Transparency of measures regulating the pricing of medicinal products for human use and their inclusion in the scope of national health insurance systems — Article 4 — Price freeze imposed on all medicinal products or on certain categories of medicinal products — National measure concerning only certain medicinal products, on an individual basis — Setting a maximum price for sales to health establishments of certain medicinal products)

cjeu_case ·
31455

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Annulment by the General Court – Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest – Remedies – Limitation period – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Out of time – Act confirming a previous measure – Inadmissibility.#Case T-480/21.

cjeu_case ·
31456

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#British Airways plc v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Annulment by the General Court – Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest – Remedies – Limitation period – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Out of time – Act confirming a previous measure – Inadmissibility.#Case T-480/21.

cjeu_case ·
31458

Case T-480/21: Order of the General Court of 22 December 2022 — British Airways v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Annulment by the General Court — Refusal of the Commission to pay default interest — Remedies — Limitation period — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Out of time — Act confirming a previous measure — Inadmissibility)

cjeu_case ·
31459

Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 22 décembre 2022.#Commission européenne contre KM, Parlement européen et Conseil de l'Union européenne et Conseil de l'Union européenne contre KM, Commission européenne et Parlement européen.#Pourvoi – Article 182 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Fonction publique – Pension – Statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Article 20 de l’annexe VIII – Octroi d’une pension de survie – Conjoint survivant d’un ancien fonctionnaire titulaire d’une pension d’ancienneté – Mariage conclu postérieurement à la cessation de service de ce fonctionnaire – Condition de durée minimale du mariage de cinq ans à la date du décès du fonctionnaire – Article 18 de l’annexe VIII – Mariage conclu antérieurement à la cessation de service du fonctionnaire – Condition de durée minimale du mariage d’un an seulement – Exception d’illégalité de l’article 20 de l’annexe VIII – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 20 – Principe d’égalité de traitement – Article 21, paragraphe 1 – Principe de non-discrimination fondée sur l’âge – Article 52, paragraphe 1 – Absence d’une différenciation arbitraire ou manifestement inadéquate au regard de l’objectif poursuivi par le législateur de l’Union européenne.#Affaires jointes C-341/21 P et C-357/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
31460

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#European Commission and Council of the European Union v KM.#Appeal – Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Pension – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 20 of Annex VIII – Grant of a survivor’s pension – Surviving spouse of a former official in receipt of a retirement pension – Marriage entered into after termination of that official’s service – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least five years at the date of the official’s death – Article 18 of Annex VIII – Marriage entered into before termination of the official’s service – Condition that the marriage must have lasted for at least one year only – Plea of illegality in respect of Article 20 of Annex VIII – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 20 – Principle of equal treatment – Article 21(1) – Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age – Article 52(1) – No arbitrary or manifestly inappropriate differentiation in the light of the objective pursued by the EU legislature.#Joined Cases C-341/21 P and C-357/21 P.

cjeu_case ·