Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161340) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43225) directive (8067)
316,946 documents
30441

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Environment – Directive 2008/50/EC – Ambient air quality – Article 13(1) and Annex XI – Systematic and persistent exceedance of the limit values for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the agglomeration of Athens (Greece) – Article 23(1) – Annex XV – Exceedance period to be ‘as short as possible’ – Appropriate measures.#Case C-633/21.

cjeu_case ·
30442

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#IG and Agenţia Municipală pentru Ocuparea Forţei de Muncă Bucureşti v Agenţia Judeţeană de Ocupare a Forţei de Muncă Ilfov and IM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of employees in the event of their employer’s insolvency – Directive 2008/94/EC – Employees’ salary claims borne by guarantee institutions – Limitation of the liability of guarantee institutions to employees’ salary claims relating to the three months prior or subsequent to the date on which insolvency proceedings are opened – Application of a limitation period – Recovery of payments unduly made by the guarantee institution – Conditions.#Joined Cases C-524/21 and C-525/21.

cjeu_case ·
30443

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#IG and Agenţia Municipală pentru Ocuparea Forţei de Muncă Bucureşti v Agenţia Judeţeană de Ocupare a Forţei de Muncă Ilfov and IM.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of employees in the event of their employer’s insolvency – Directive 2008/94/EC – Employees’ salary claims borne by guarantee institutions – Limitation of the liability of guarantee institutions to employees’ salary claims relating to the three months prior or subsequent to the date on which insolvency proceedings are opened – Application of a limitation period – Recovery of payments unduly made by the guarantee institution – Conditions.#Joined Cases C-524/21 and C-525/21.

cjeu_case ·
30444

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#ASA v DGRFP Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Construction of a building complex by an association without legal personality – Association contract – Sale of the apartments of that building complex by certain members – Determination of the taxable person liable for the tax – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Right to deduct VAT.#Case C-519/21.

cjeu_case ·
30445

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#ASA v DGRFP Cluj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Construction of a building complex by an association without legal personality – Association contract – Sale of the apartments of that building complex by certain members – Determination of the taxable person liable for the tax – Principle of fiscal neutrality – Right to deduct VAT.#Case C-519/21.

cjeu_case ·
30446

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#Monz Handelsgesellschaft lnternational mbH & Co. KG v Büchel GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugtechnik KG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Design – Directive 98/71/EC – Article 3(3) and (4) – Conditions for obtaining protection for a component part of a complex product – Concepts of ‘visibility’ and ‘normal use’ – Visibility of a component part of a complex product during normal use of that product by the end user.#Case C-472/21.

cjeu_case ·
30447

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#Monz Handelsgesellschaft lnternational mbH & Co. KG v Büchel GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugtechnik KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual property – Design – Directive 98/71/EC – Article 3(3) and (4) – Conditions for obtaining protection for a component part of a complex product – Concepts of ‘visibility’ and ‘normal use’ – Visibility of a component part of a complex product during normal use of that product by the end user.#Case C-472/21.

cjeu_case ·
30449

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#Lufthansa Technik AERO Alzey GmbH v Arik Air Limited and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 23(c) – Stay of enforcement of a judgment certified as a European Enforcement Order – Exceptional circumstances – Concept.#Case C-393/21.

cjeu_case ·
30450

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#HYA and Othersprokuratura.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58 – Article 15(1) – Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising the interception, recording and storage of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – Practice whereby the decision is drawn up in accordance with a pre-drafted template text that does not contain individualised reasons – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-349/21.

cjeu_case ·
30451

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#HYA and Othersprokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58 – Article 15(1) – Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising the interception, recording and storage of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – Practice whereby the decision is drawn up in accordance with a pre-drafted template text that does not contain individualised reasons – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-349/21.

cjeu_case ·
30452

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#PV v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie'.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support measures for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development – Agri-environmental payments – Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 – Inability of the beneficiaries to continue to comply with the commitments given – Concepts of ‘reparcelling’ and ‘land-consolidation measures’ – Absence of measures necessary to adapt the obligations of the beneficiary to the new situation of the holding – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Concept of ‘force majeure and exceptional circumstances’.#Case C-343/21.

cjeu_case ·
30453

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#PV v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support measures for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development – Agri-environmental payments – Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 – Inability of the beneficiaries to continue to comply with the commitments given – Concepts of ‘reparcelling’ and ‘land-consolidation measures’ – Absence of measures necessary to adapt the obligations of the beneficiary to the new situation of the holding – Regulation (EC) No 1122/2009 – Concept of ‘force majeure and exceptional circumstances’.#Case C-343/21.

cjeu_case ·
30454

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#Tráficos Manuel Ferrer S.L. and Ignacio v Daimler AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Decision of the Commission finding the existence of collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – National rule of civil procedure under which, in the event that the claim is upheld in part, costs are to be borne by each party, except in cases of wrongful conduct – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence – Directive 2014/104/EU – Objectives and overall balance – Article 3 – Right to full compensation for the harm suffered – Article 11(1) – Joint and several liability of the undertakings that infringe competition law – Article 17(1) – Possibility for national courts to estimate the harm – Conditions – Impossibility or unreasonable difficulties in quantifying harm – Article 22 – Temporal application.#Case C-312/21.

cjeu_case ·
30455

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 February 2023.#Tráficos Manuel Ferrer S.L. and Ignacio v Daimler AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil Valencia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Compensation for harm caused by a practice prohibited under Article 101(1) TFEU – Decision of the Commission finding the existence of collusive arrangements on pricing and gross price increases for trucks in the European Economic Area (EEA) – National rule of civil procedure under which, in the event that the claim is upheld in part, costs are to be borne by each party, except in cases of wrongful conduct – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence – Directive 2014/104/EU – Objectives and overall balance – Article 3 – Right to full compensation for the harm suffered – Article 11(1) – Joint and several liability of the undertakings that infringe competition law – Article 17(1) – Possibility for national courts to estimate the harm – Conditions – Impossibility or unreasonable difficulties in quantifying harm – Article 22 – Temporal application.#Case C-312/21.

cjeu_case ·
30456

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 16 February 2023.#Jérôme Rivière and Others v European Parliament.#Appeal – Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament – Standards of conduct – Rule 10(3) – Prohibition on displaying banners during the sittings of Parliament – Oral measure of the President of the Parliament prohibiting MEPs from displaying national flags on their lecterns – Action for annulment – Article 263 TFEU – Concept of ‘challengeable act’.#Case C-767/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
30457

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 16 February 2023.#X v International Protection Appeals Tribunal and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection – Directive 2004/83/EC – Minimum standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Second sentence of Article 4(1) – Cooperation of the Member State with the applicant to assess the relevant elements of the application – Scope – General credibility of the applicant – Article 4(5)(e) – Evaluation criteria – Common procedures for the grant of international protection – Directive 2005/85/EC – Appropriate examination – Article 8(2) and (3) – Judicial review – Article 39 – Scope – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Reasonable time to take a decision – Article 23(2) and Article 39(4) – Consequences of any breach.#Case C-756/21.

cjeu_case ·
30458

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 16 February 2023.#Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v AA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/95/EU – Standards for granting refugee status or subsidiary protection status – Article 14(4)(b) – Revocation of refugee status – Third-country national convicted by a final judgment of a particularly serious crime – Danger to the community – Proportionality test – Directive 2008/115/EU – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Postponement of removal.#Case C-663/21.

cjeu_case ·
30459

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 16 February 2023.#BNP Paribas SA v TR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Articles 33 and 36 – Recognition of a judgment given in another Member State – Question raised incidentally before the courts of another Member State – Effects produced by that judgment in the State of origin – Admissibility of an action brought in the Member State addressed after that judgment – National procedural rules imposing the concentration of claims in a single set of proceedings.#Case C-567/21.

cjeu_case ·
30460

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 16 February 2023.#Arkadiusz Szcześniak v Bank M. SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy - Śródmieścia w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan indexed to a foreign currency – Conversion clauses – Determination of the exchange rate between that foreign currency and the national currency – Effects of a finding that a clause is unfair – Effects of the annulment of a contract in its entirety – Possibility of asserting claims that go beyond the reimbursement of the amounts agreed in the contract and the payment of default interest – Damage incurred by the consumer – Unavailability of the amount of the monthly instalments paid to the bank – Damage incurred by the bank – Unavailability of the amount of the capital paid to the consumer – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Effective protection of the consumer – Judicial interpretation of national legislation.#Case C-520/21.

cjeu_case ·