Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
25561

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 21 September 2023.#QM v Kiwi Tours GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked services – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) – Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – Spread of COVID-19 – Consequences significantly affecting the performance of the package or the carriage of passengers to the destination – Foreseeability of the occurrence of those consequences at the date of the declaration of termination – Events occurring after the termination date but before the start of the package.#Case C-584/22.

cjeu_case ·
25562

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 21 September 2023.#Die Länderbahn GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Access to railway infrastructure – Charges – Article 56 – Single national regulatory body for the railway sector – Powers – Review of the infrastructure charges whose period of application has expired – Power to declare invalidity with effect ex tunc and to order the reimbursement of charges.#Case C-582/22.

cjeu_case ·
25563

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 21 September 2023.#Mylan AB v Gilead Sciences Finland Oy and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Markkinaoikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Intellectual and industrial property – Medicinal product for human use – Supplementary protection certificate (SPC) – Directive 2004/48/EC – Article 9(7) – Placing on the market of products infringing SPC rights – Provisional measures ordered on the basis of an SPC – Subsequent invalidity of the SPC and revocation of the measures – Consequences – Right to appropriate compensation for losses caused by the provisional measures – Liability of the applicant for those measures for losses caused by them – National legislation providing for strict liability.#Case C-473/22.

cjeu_case ·
25564

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 21 September 2023.#P sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Lublinie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Obligation to pay – Person who enters VAT on an invoice – Person liable to pay VAT – Fake invoices issued by an employee including the employer’s details without its knowledge or consent – Employer due diligence.#Case C-442/22.

cjeu_case ·
25565

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 21 September 2023.#Audi AG v GQ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EU trade mark – Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 9(2) and (3)(a) to (c) – Right conferred by an EU trade mark – Concept of ‘using in the course of trade any sign’ – Article 14(1)(c) – Limitations on the effects of an EU trade mark – Right of the proprietor of an EU trade mark to oppose the use by a third party of a sign identical with, or similar to, the trade mark for motor vehicle spare parts – Component of a radiator grille designed for the attachment of an emblem representing the trade mark of a motor vehicle manufacturer.#Case C-334/22.

cjeu_case ·
25566

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 21 September 2023.#Peter Sweetman v An Bord Pleanála and Ireland and the Attorney General.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2000/60/EC – Framework for EU action in the field of water policy – Article 4(1)(a) – Environmental objectives relating to surface water – Obligation of the Member States not to authorise a project which may cause a deterioration of the status of a surface water body – Article 5 and Annex II – Characterisation of surface water body types – Article 8 and Annex V – Classification of surface water status – Article 11 – Programme of measures – Project for the abstraction of water from a lake with a surface area below 0.5 km².#Case C-301/22.

cjeu_case ·
25567

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 21 September 2023.#M. D. v 'Tez Tour' UAB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Package travel and linked services – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Article 12(2) – Right of a traveller to terminate a package travel contract without paying a termination fee – Unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances – Spread of COVID-19 – No official recommendation against travel – Consideration of personal circumstances relating to the individual situation of the traveller concerned – Consequences significantly affecting the performance of the package or the carriage of passengers to the destination – Circumstances existing or foreseeable on the date of conclusion of the package travel contract concerned – Possibility of taking into account consequences occurring at the place of departure or return as well as at other places.#Case C-299/22.

cjeu_case ·
25568

Case C-510/22, Romaqua Group: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie — Romania) — Romaqua Group SA v Societatea Națională a Apelor Minerale SA and Agenția Națională pentru Resurse Minerale (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 102 and 106 TFEU — Public undertakings — Freedom to conduct a business — Freedom of establishment — Undertaking that is wholly owned by a Member State and holds exclusive concessions for the exploitation of natural mineral water following an award without a competitive tendering procedure — National legislation allowing for the unlimited extension of the concession)

cjeu_case ·
25569

Case C-210/22, Stappert Deutschland: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Stappert Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hannover (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Union Customs Code — Article 60(2) — Acquisition of origin of goods — Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 — Article 32 — Goods the production of which involves more than one country or territory — Annex 22-01 — Primary rule applicable to goods under subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised System — Concept of ‘hollow profile’ — Steel ‘tube blanks’ under subheading 7304 49 of the Harmonised System, obtained by hot-forming and enabling the production of steel tubes by cold forming, under subheading 7304 41 of the Harmonised System — Validity of the primary rule)

cjeu_case ·
25570

Case C-164/22, Juan: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional — Spain) — Execution of the European arrest warrant issued against Juan (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Grounds for non-execution — Point 2 of Article 3 — Principle ne bis in idem — Concept of ‘same acts’ — Set of concrete circumstances which are inextricably linked together — Fraudulent activities carried out by the requested person in two Member States, through two separate legal entities and to the detriment of different victims)

cjeu_case ·
25571

Case C-151/22, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Political opinions in the host Member State): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — S, A v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Common asylum policy — Eligibility for refugee status — Directive 2011/95/EC — Article 10(1)(e) and (2) — Reasons for persecution — ‘Political opinion’ — Concept — Political opinions developed in the host Member State — Article 4 — Assessment of the well-founded fear of persecution on account of those political opinions)

cjeu_case ·
25572

Case C-143/22, ADDE and Others: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Association Avocats pour la défense des droits des étrangers (ADDE) and Others v Ministre de l’Intérieur (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Border control, asylum and immigration — Regulation (EU) 2016/399 — Article 32 — Temporary reintroduction of border control by a Member State at its internal borders — Article 14 — Refusal of entry — Equation of internal borders with external borders — Directive 2008/115/EC — Scope — Article 2(2)(a))

cjeu_case ·
25573

Case C-139/22, mBank (Polish register of unlawful terms): Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie — Poland) — AM, PM v mBank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Mortgage loan contract index-linked to a foreign currency — Criteria for assessment of whether a conversion clause is unfair — National register of standard business terms which are held to be unlawful — Duty to provide information)

cjeu_case ·
25574

Case C-116/22: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 September 2023 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Article 4(4) and Article 6(1) — Failure to designate special areas of conservation — Failure to determine conservation objectives — Absence or insufficiency of conservation measures — Administrative practice)

cjeu_case ·
25575

Case C-47/22, Apotheke B.: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — Apotheke B. v Bundesamt für Sicherheit im Gesundheitswesen (BASG) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Pharmaceutical and cosmetic products — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 77(6) — Article 79(b) — Article 80(b) — Guidelines on Good Distribution Practice of medicinal products for human use (GDP) — Pharmaceutical distribution chain — Holder of a wholesale distribution authorisation obtaining medicinal products from persons authorised to supply medicinal products to the public without holding a distribution authorisation or being exempted from the obligation to have such an authorisation — Definitions of ‘sufficiently qualified personnel’ and ‘responsible person’ — Suspension or withdrawal of wholesale distribution authorisation)

cjeu_case ·
25576

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 21 septembre 2023.#Fachverband Spielhallen eV et LM contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Aides d’État – Article 107, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Notion d’“aide” – Condition relative à l’avantage sélectif – Traitement fiscal réservé aux exploitants de casinos publics en Allemagne – Prélèvement sur les bénéfices – Déductibilité partielle des montants acquittés au titre de ce prélèvement de l’assiette de l’impôt sur le revenu ou sur les sociétés et de la taxe professionnelle – Décision de la Commission européenne – Rejet d’une plainte au terme de la phase préliminaire d’examen au motif de l’absence d’une aide d’État constituée par cette déductibilité – Constatation distincte de l’inexistence d’un avantage économique et d’une absence de sélectivité – Recours devant le Tribunal de l’Union européenne limité à la constatation de l’absence de sélectivité – Caractère inopérant du recours – Identification par la Commission du système de référence ou régime fiscal “normal” – Interprétation à cette fin du droit fiscal national applicable – Qualification du prélèvement sur les bénéfices d’“impôt spécial” déductible au titre des “dépenses induites par les opérations commerciales” – Principe ne ultra petita.#Affaire C-831/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
25577

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Fachverband Spielhallen eV and LM v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Concept of ‘aid’ – Condition relating to selective advantage – Tax treatment of operators of public casinos in Germany – Levy on the profits – Partial deductibility of the amounts paid in respect of that levy from the tax base for income or corporation tax and trade tax – Decision of the European Commission – Rejection of a complaint at the end of the preliminary examination stage on the ground that that deductibility does not constitute State aid – Separate finding of no economic advantage and no selectivity – Action before the General Court of the European Union limited to the finding of no selectivity – Action deemed ineffective – Identification by the Commission of the reference system or ‘normal’ tax system – Interpretation for that purpose of the applicable national tax law – Classification of the levy on the profits as a ‘special tax’ deductible in respect of ‘costs associated with commercial transactions’ – Principle ne ultra petita.#Case C-831/21 P.

cjeu_case ·
25578

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 21 septembre 2023.#OGL-Food Trade Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH contre Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia « Mitnitsa Plovdiv » pri Agentsia « Mitnitsi ».#Renvoi préjudiciel – Union douanière – Règlement (UE) no 952/2013 – Code des douanes de l’Union – Articles 70 et 74 – Détermination de la valeur en douane – Valeur en douane de fruits et légumes auxquels s’applique un prix d’entrée – Règlement (UE) no 1308/2013 – Article 181 – Règlement délégué (UE) 2017/891 – Article 75, paragraphes 5 et 6 – Valeur transactionnelle déclarée supérieure à la valeur forfaitaire à l’importation – Écoulement des produits dans des conditions confirmant la réalité de la valeur transactionnelle – Vente à perte par l’importateur – Liens entre l’importateur et l’exportateur – Contrôle juridictionnel de la décision fixant la dette douanière.#Affaire C-770/21.

cjeu_case ·
25579

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#'OGL-Food Trade Lebensmittelvertrieb' GmbH v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia 'Mitnitsa Plovdiv' pri Agentsia 'Mitnitsi'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Articles 70 and 74 – Determination of the customs value – Customs value of fruit and vegetables to which an entry price applies – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Article 181 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/891 – Article 75(5) and (6) – Declared transaction value higher than the standard import value – Disposal of products under conditions confirming the correctness of the transaction value – Sale by the importer at a loss – Relationship between the importer and the exporter – Judicial review of the decision determining the customs debt.#Case C-770/21.

cjeu_case ·
25580

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 September 2023.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v E. and S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Dublin System – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Responsibility of the Member State which issued a residence document to the applicant – Article 2(l) – Meaning of ‘residence document’ – Diplomatic card issued by a Member State – Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.#Case C-568/21.

cjeu_case ·