Documents : Union européenne

Union supranationale de 27 États membres. Les actes officiels (règlements, directives, décisions) sont publiés par l'Office des publications de l'UE (Cellar/EUR-Lex). La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'UE (CJUE) relève également d'un organe de l'UE.

Site officiel ↗

Types de documents
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 documents
24461

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#TestBioTech eV v European Commission.#Environment – Genetically modified products – Genetically modified soybean containing, consisting of or produced from MON 87751 × MON 87701 × MON 87708 × MON 89788 and its subcombinations – Rejection of an application for internal review of an authorisation for placing on the market – Manifest error of assessment – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Articles 4 to 6 and 16 to 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Article 5 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013.#Case T-606/21.

cjeu_case ·
24462

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#TestBioTech eV v European Commission.#Environment – Genetically modified products – Genetically modified maize containing, consisting of or produced from MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and its subcombinations – Rejection of an application for internal review of an authorisation for placing on the market – Manifest error of assessment – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Articles 4 to 6 and 16 to 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Article 5 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013.#Case T-605/21.

cjeu_case ·
24463

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#TestBioTech eV v European Commission.#Environment – Genetically modified products – Genetically modified maize containing, consisting of or produced from MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and its subcombinations – Rejection of an application for internal review of an authorisation for placing on the market – Manifest error of assessment – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Articles 4 to 6 and 16 to 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 – Article 5 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013.#Case T-605/21.

cjeu_case ·
24464

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#OAO Belaz-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belaz Holding v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-533/21.

cjeu_case ·
24465

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#OAO Belaz-upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belaz Holding v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-533/21.

cjeu_case ·
24466

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#OAO Minskii Avtomobilnyi Zavod - upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-532/21.

cjeu_case ·
24467

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#OAO Minskii Avtomobilnyi Zavod - upravljajusaja kompanija holdinga Belavtomaz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘support for the regime’ – State-owned enterprise – Error of assessment.#Case T-532/21.

cjeu_case ·
24468

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Aid granted by Italy to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Direct grant – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Consideration of earlier aid measures in favour of the same beneficiary which are the subject of pending formal investigations – Assessment of damages – Causal link – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-333/21.

cjeu_case ·
24469

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air transport market – Aid granted by Italy to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Direct grant – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Consideration of earlier aid measures in favour of the same beneficiary which are the subject of pending formal investigations – Assessment of damages – Causal link – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-333/21.

cjeu_case ·
24470

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – State guarantee on loans – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-332/21.

cjeu_case ·
24471

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Wizz Air Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.) v European Commission.#State aid – Romanian air transport market – Aid granted by Romania to TAROM in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – State guarantee on loans – Decision not to raise any objections – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market in question – Admissibility – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Assessment of the damage – Causal link – Beneficiary’s pre-existing difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Freedom to provide services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-332/21.

cjeu_case ·
24472

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air-transport market – Aid granted by Italy to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Direct grant – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Consideration of earlier aid measures in favour of the same beneficiary which is the subject of pending formal investigations – Assessment of damages – Causal link – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-225/21.

cjeu_case ·
24473

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Italian air-transport market – Aid granted by Italy to an airline in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Direct grant – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Consideration of earlier aid measures in favour of the same beneficiary which is the subject of pending formal investigations – Assessment of damages – Causal link – Principle of non-discrimination – Free provision of services – Freedom of establishment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-225/21.

cjeu_case ·
24476

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 October 2023.#Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Cephalon Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Modafinil market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Patent dispute settlement agreement – Restriction of competition by object – Characterisation – Restriction of competition by effect – Conditions for exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU – Fines.#Case T-74/21.

cjeu_case ·
24477

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 18 October 2023.#Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd and Cephalon Inc. v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Modafinil market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Patent dispute settlement agreement – Restriction of competition by object – Characterisation – Restriction of competition by effect – Conditions for exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU – Fines.#Case T-74/21.

cjeu_case ·
24478

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Belgian air transport market – Aid granted by Belgium to Brussels Airlines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation – Loan – Decision not to raise objections – Temporary framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-14/21.

cjeu_case ·
24479

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Belgian air transport market – Aid granted by Belgium to Brussels Airlines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Recapitalisation – Loan – Decision not to raise objections – Temporary framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-14/21.

cjeu_case ·
24480

Case T-631/21: Order of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — BZ v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Complaint of discrimination and psychological harassment — Internal administrative inquiry — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Point from which time starts to run — Pre-litigation procedure — Liability — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case ·