Documents of European Union

Supranational union of 27 member states. Official acts (regulations, directives, decisions) are published via the Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Case law of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) is also an EU body.

Official website ↗

Document types
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316,913 documents
24409

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#VU and IT v EUROBANK BULGARIA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) and Article 4 – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language – Bank loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Term that places the exchange risk entirely on the consumer – Advantage not specifically agreed upon for the benefit of the credit institution resulting from the conversion, into the settlement currency, of the amount of the loan expressed in the currency of the account – Article 6 – Consequences of a finding that a contractual term is unfair.#Case C-117/23.

cjeu_case ·
24410

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#VU and IT v EUROBANK BULGARIA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) and Article 4 – Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms – Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language – Bank loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency – Term that places the exchange risk entirely on the consumer – Advantage not specifically agreed upon for the benefit of the credit institution resulting from the conversion, into the settlement currency, of the amount of the loan expressed in the currency of the account – Article 6 – Consequences of a finding that a contractual term is unfair.#Case C-117/23.

cjeu_case ·
24412

Case C-117/23, Eurobank Bulgaria: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Sofia — Bulgaria) — VU, IT v EUROBANK BULGARIA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Article 3(1) and Article 4 — Assessment of the unfairness of contractual terms — Contractual term that is in plain, intelligible language — Bank loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Term that places the exchange risk entirely on the consumer — Advantage not specifically agreed upon for the benefit of the credit institution resulting from the conversion, into the settlement currency, of the amount of the loan expressed in the currency of the account — Article 6 — Consequences of a finding that a contractual term is unfair)

cjeu_case ·
24413

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping - Navegação, Lda v European Commission.#State aid – Free Zone of Madeira – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-721/22.

cjeu_case ·
24414

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Bourbon Offshore Interoil Shipping - Navegação, Lda v European Commission.#State aid – Free Zone of Madeira – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-721/22.

cjeu_case ·
24415

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Newalliance Comércio Internacional, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair trial – Actions manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-683/22 to T-688/22, T-690/22 to T-693/22, T-695/22 to T-701/22, T-707/22 and T-708/22.

cjeu_case ·
24416

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Newalliance Comércio Internacional, Lda (Zona Franca da Madeira) and Others v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair trial – Actions manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-683/22 to T-688/22, T-690/22 to T-693/22, T-695/22 to T-701/22, T-707/22 and T-708/22.

cjeu_case ·
24417

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Nagolimad - Serviços Internacionais, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair hearing – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-668/22.

cjeu_case ·
24418

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Nagolimad - Serviços Internacionais, SA v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Obligation to state reasons – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Reasonable time – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Right to a fair hearing – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-668/22.

cjeu_case ·
24419

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Renco Valore SpA and Seopult LTD v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Additional pleas put forward by the intervener – Admissibility – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-588/22 and T-660/22.

cjeu_case ·
24420

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 October 2023.#Renco Valore SpA and Seopult LTD v European Commission.#State aid – Madeira Free Zone – Aid scheme implemented by Portugal – Decision finding that the scheme does not comply with Decisions C(2007) 3037 final and C(2013) 4043 final, declaring it to be incompatible with the internal market, and ordering the recovery of aid paid under that scheme – Concept of ‘existing aid’ within the meaning of Article 1(b)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Recovery – Legitimate expectations – Legal certainty – Additional pleas put forward by the intervener – Admissibility – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Cases T-588/22 and T-660/22.

cjeu_case ·