Documents : Union européenne

104314 documents
221

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety v Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Public service contracts – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Private security services – Decision not to include the applicant among the pre-selected operators – Point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 and point 39.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-493/24.

cjeu_case ·
222

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety v Mission d'assistance de l'Union européenne pour une gestion intégrée des frontières en Libye (EUBAM Libya).#Public service contracts – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Private security services – Decision not to include the applicant among the pre-selected operators – Point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 and point 39.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination.#Case T-493/24.

cjeu_case ·
223

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS and Marlink Events SAS v European Defence Agency.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation.#Case T-105/24.

cjeu_case ·
224

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 1 July 2026.#Airbus Defence and Space SAS and Marlink Events SAS v European Defence Agency.#Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation.#Case T-105/24.

cjeu_case ·
227

Case T-493/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Alhares for Security Services and Occupational Safety v EUBAM Libya (Public service contracts – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Private security services – Decision not to include the applicant among the pre-selected operators – Point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 and point 39.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Equal treatment – Principle of non-discrimination)

cjeu_case ·
228

Case T-105/24: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Airbus Defence and Space and Marlink Events v EDA (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Provision of satellite communications, equipment and related services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid – Award of the contract to another tenderer – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 – Award criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Obligation to examine tenders in accordance with the criteria set out in the procurement documents – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Non-contractual liability – Loss of opportunity – Compensation)

cjeu_case ·
234

Ordonnance de la Cour (chambre d’admission des pourvois) du 30 juin 2026.#Puma SE contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle (EUIPO).#Pourvoi – Marque de l’Union européenne – Admission des pourvois – Article 170 ter du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Demande ne démontrant pas l’importance d’une question pour l’unité, la cohérence ou le développement du droit de l’Union – Non-admission du pourvoi.#Affaire C-278/26 P.

cjeu_case ·
237

Case C-278/26 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 June 2026 Appeal brought on 1 April 2026 by Puma SE against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026 – T-43/25, Puma v EUIPO – Ningbo Gongfang Commercial Management (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case ·
239

Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.

cjeu_case ·