Документы: Европейский Союз

2341

Case T-237/26: Action brought on 14 April 2026 – ExxonMobil Petroleum & Chemical e.a. v ECHA

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2342

Case T-236/26: Action brought on 14 April 2026 – RY v EIB

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2343

Case C-328/26, Gafaris: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Dioikitiko Protodikeio Thessalonikis (Greece) lodged on 14 April 2026 – B.M. v Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2344

Case C-323/26, Protectra: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Leipzig (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2026 – Protectra GmbH v sprd.net AG

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2345

Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 14 avril 2026.#Grzegorz Chudy contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant des photophores pour tombes – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit.#Affaire T-335/25.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2346

Ordonnance du Tribunal (deuxième chambre) du 14 avril 2026.#Grzegorz Chudy contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#* Langue de procédure : le polonais. Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant des photophores pour tombes – Recours manifestement dépourvu de tout fondement en droit».#Affaire T-335/25.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2347

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#Nesrine Ben Ali v Council of the European Union.#Case T-216/25.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2348

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#Belhassen Ben Mohamed Ben Rhouma Trabelsi v Council of the European Union.#Case T-207/25.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2349

Case T-335/25: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2026 – Chudy v EUIPO – Peca (Graveside lights) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing graveside lights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2350

Case T-216/25: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2026 – Ben Ali v Council (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of her name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2351

Case T-207/25: Order of the General Court of 14 April 2026 – Trabelsi v Council (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Letter informing the applicant of the maintenance of his name on the list – Act not open to challenge – Manifest inadmissibility)

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2352

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-867/25 P.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2353

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-867/25 P.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2354

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-824/25 P.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2355

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-824/25 P.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2356

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v Ffauf Italia SpA.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-753/25 P.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2357

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Industria de Diseño Textil, SA v Ffauf Italia SpA.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-753/25 P.

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2358

Case C-867/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by Homestar sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2025 – T-611/24, Homestar v EUIPO – General Sanitary (THERMATEC) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2359

Case C-824/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 12 December 2025 by Frutaria Innovation SL against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-381/24, Frutaria Innovation v EUIPO – Schneider (Frutaria) (Appeal–EU trade mark–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.

2360

Case C-753/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 21 November 2025 by Industria de Diseño Textil, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 – T-425/24, Ffauf Italia v EUIPO (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)

cjeu_case · 14 апреля 2026 г.