Документы: Европейский Союз

201

Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Francesco Testa e.a. contre Parquet européen.#Fonction publique – Procureur européen délégué – Rémunération – Indemnité prévue en droit national pour les procureurs affectés temporairement à un parquet différent de celui d’origine – Demande de montant complémentaire – Rejet de la demande – Responsabilité.#Affaires T-100/25, T-102/25 et T-103/25.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

202

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

203

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant un abat-jour – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection ‑ Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-42/25.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

204

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une guirlande électrique – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-41/25.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

205

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne – Procédure de nullité – Dessin ou modèle de l’Union européenne enregistré représentant une guirlande électrique – Motif de nullité – Non-respect des conditions de protection – Article 25, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (CE) no 6/2002 – Absence de caractère individuel – Article 6 du règlement no 6/2002 – Examen d’office des faits – Article 63, paragraphe 1, du règlement no 6/2002.#Affaire T-41/25.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

206

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

207

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#DecoTrend GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-40/25.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

208

Case T-615/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Veikkaus v EUIPO (FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark FOR BETTER GAMING – VEIKKAUS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Element of the mark having distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

209

Cases T-424/25 to T-428/25 and T-439/25 to T-443/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KJ and Others v Europol (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Europol decision concerning the extension of contractual relationships up to 10 years – Exclusion of contract staff who have already been renewed – Rejection of the request for an additional year of service – Plea of illegality – Equal treatment – Temporal application of the rules of substantive law – Legal certainty – Liability)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

210

Case T-415/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – KH v Commission (Civil service – Temporary staff – Recruitment – Internal competition COM/AST4/2023 – Decision to exclude the applicant from the competition – Failure to attend the oral test on health grounds – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Principle of sound administration – Liability – Non-material damage)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

211

Case T-361/25, Brenntag: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 1 July 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf – Germany) – Brenntag GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Article 27(1) and (2) of Directive 92/83/EEC – Article 7(1), Article 7(2)(a), Article 20(2) and Article 30 of Directive 2008/118/EC – Irregularity occurring during the movement of excise goods – Movement of goods under a duty suspension arrangement – Levying of excise duty due to the absence of an accompanying document specific to excise goods)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

212

Case T-173/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – BT GS Belgium v Commission (Public service contracts – Tendering procedure – Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations – New Generation Extension (TESTA-ng III) – Negotiated procedure without prior publication of a contract notice – Article 164(5)(f) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 and point (c) of the second subparagraph of point 11.1 of Annex I to Regulation 2018/1046 – Extreme urgency – Unforeseeable events not attributable to the contracting authority – Transparency – Equal treatment)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

213

Cases T-100/25, T-102/25 and T-103/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – Testa and Others v EPPO (Civil Service – European Delegated Prosecutor – Remuneration – Allowance provided for under national law for prosecutors temporarily assigned to a public prosecutor’s office other than their office of origin – Request for an additional top-up allowance – Refusal of the request – Liability)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

214

Case T-42/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – Light Tec (Lampshade) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Grounds for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

215

Case T-41/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – Light Tec (String of lights) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a string of lights – Grounds for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

216

Case T-40/25: Judgment of the General Court of 1 July 2026 – DecoTrend v EUIPO – B.K.Licht (Lampshade) (EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a lampshade – Earlier designs appearing in Swiss and United States patent specifications – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Elements of patent specifications containing the earlier designs to be taken into account when assessing the overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

217

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-654/24.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

218

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Driss El Hakmaoui Attilah v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark 4011 B552 – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T-654/24.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

219

Arrêt du Tribunal (première chambre) du 1er juillet 2026.#Sandoz AG contre Office de l’Union européenne pour la propriété intellectuelle.#Marque de l’Union européenne – Procédure d’opposition – Demande de marque de l’Union européenne verbale ARYUNA – Marques Benelux et nationale verbales antérieures ARMUNIA – Motif relatif de refus – Absence de risque de confusion – Article 8, paragraphe 1, sous b), du règlement (UE) 2017/1001 – Éléments de preuve présentés pour la première fois devant le Tribunal ».#Affaire T-591/24.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026

220

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2026.#Sandoz AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ARYUNA – Earlier Benelux and national word marks ARMUNIA – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Court.#Case T-591/24.

cjeu_case · June 30, 2026