Документы: Европейский Союз

Наднациональное объединение 27 государств. Официальные документы (регламенты, директивы, решения) публикуются через Publications Office of the EU (Cellar/EUR-Lex). Практика Суда ЕС (CJEU) — тоже орган ЕС.

Официальный сайт ↗

Типы документов
regulation (161334) cjeu_case (104314) decision (43198) directive (8067)
316 913 документов
21842

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 January 2024.#Markus Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-614/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
21844

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NO v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Obligation imposed on a solicitor to transfer fees to a competitor – Decision of the European Commission finding that the measure in question does not constitute State aid – Action for annulment in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-522/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
21845

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NO v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – State aid – Obligation imposed on a solicitor to transfer fees to a competitor – Decision of the European Commission finding that the measure in question does not constitute State aid – Action for annulment in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.#Case C-522/23 P.

cjeu_case ·
21848

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Cohesion Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Articles 99 and 101 – Financial corrections in connection with detected irregularities – Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 – Article 104 – Financial corrections made by the Commission – Commission decision annulling in part a contribution from that fund – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47, first subparagraph – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-471/22.

cjeu_case ·
21849

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Cohesion Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Articles 99 and 101 – Financial corrections in connection with detected irregularities – Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 – Article 104 – Financial corrections made by the Commission – Commission decision annulling in part a contribution from that fund – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47, first subparagraph – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-471/22.

cjeu_case ·
21850

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#P sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Lublinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Obligation to pay – Person who enters VAT on an invoice – Person liable to pay VAT – Fake invoices issued by an employee including the employer’s details without its knowledge or consent – Employer due diligence.#Case C-442/22.

cjeu_case ·
21851

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#P sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Lublinie.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 203 – Obligation to pay – Person who enters VAT on an invoice – Person liable to pay VAT – Fake invoices issued by an employee including the employer’s details without its knowledge or consent – Employer due diligence.#Case C-442/22.

cjeu_case ·
21852

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti – Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating crime – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Data minimisation – Limitation of storage – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage – Article 10 – Processing of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 16(2) and (3) – Right to erasure – Restriction of processing – Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Natural person convicted by final judgment and subsequently legally rehabilitated – Storage of data until death – No right to erasure or restriction of processing – Proportionality.#Case C-118/22.

cjeu_case ·
21853

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti – Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating crime – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Data minimisation – Limitation of storage – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage – Article 10 – Processing of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 16(2) and (3) – Right to erasure – Restriction of processing – Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Natural person convicted by final judgment and subsequently legally rehabilitated – Storage of data until death – No right to erasure or restriction of processing – Proportionality.#Case C-118/22.

cjeu_case ·
21854

Case C-580/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024 — bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Bayerischer Rundfunk, Hessischer Rundfunk, Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk, Norddeutscher Rundfunk, Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg, Saarländischer Rundfunk, Südwestrundfunk, Westdeutscher Rundfunk Köln, Radio Bremen (Appeal — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark tagesschau — Partial revocation — Representation by a lawyer — Independence requirement)

cjeu_case ·
21855

Case C-471/22, Agentsia ‘Patna infrastruktura’ (European funding of road infrastructure): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Agentsia ‘Patna infrastruktura’ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa ‘Transport’ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia ‘Koordinatsia na programi i proekti’ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — European Union Cohesion Funds — Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 — Articles 99 and 101 — Financial corrections in connection with detected irregularities — Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 — Article 104 — Financial corrections made by the Commission — Commission decision annulling in part a contribution from that fund — Validity — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 41 — Right to good administration — Article 47, first paragraph — Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal)

cjeu_case ·
21856

Case C-442/22, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Lublinie (Fraud by an employee): Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 January 2024 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — P sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Lublinie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 203 — Obligation to pay — Person who enters VAT on an invoice — Person liable to pay VAT — Fake invoices issued by an employee including the employer’s details without its knowledge or consent — Employer due diligence)

cjeu_case ·
21857

Case C-118/22, Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri MVR — Sofia: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri MVR — Sofia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating crime — Directive (EU) 2016/680 — Article 4(1)(c) and (e) — Data minimisation — Limitation of storage — Article 5 — Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage — Article 10 — Processing of biometric and genetic data — Strict necessity — Article 16(2) and (3) — Right to erasure — Restriction of processing — Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Natural person convicted by final judgment and subsequently legally rehabilitated — Storage of data until death — No right to erasure or restriction of processing — Proportionality)

cjeu_case ·
21858

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Reti Televisive Italiane SpA (RTI) v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media services – Article 23(1) and (2) – Limits on the hourly broadcasting time for television advertising – Exceptions – Concept of ‘announcements made by the broadcaster in connection with its own programmes’ – Announcements made by such an organisation in order to promote broadcasts of a radio station belonging to the same broadcasting group as that broadcaster.#Case C-255/21.

cjeu_case ·
21859

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Reti Televisive Italiane SpA (RTI) v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2010/13/EU – Audiovisual media services – Article 23(1) and (2) – Limits on the hourly broadcasting time for television advertising – Exceptions – Concept of ‘announcements made by the broadcaster in connection with its own programmes’ – Announcements made by such an organisation in order to promote broadcasts of a radio station belonging to the same broadcasting group as that broadcaster.#Case C-255/21.

cjeu_case ·
21860

Case C-255/21, Reti Televisive Italiane: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Reti Televisive Italiane SpA (RTI) v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2010/13/EU — Audiovisual media services — Article 23(1) and (2) — Limits on the hourly broadcasting time for television advertising — Exceptions — Concept of ‘announcements made by the broadcaster in connection with its own programmes’ — Announcements made by such an organisation in order to promote broadcasts of a radio station belonging to the same broadcasting group as that broadcaster)

cjeu_case ·