India - Maharashtra Emergency Earthquake Rehabilitation Project

Document of The World Bank FOR OMCIAL USE ONLY 61-/i ' - 2- / / Report No. P-6262-IN MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSED CREDIT OF SDR 177 MILLION TO INDIA FOR A MAHARASHTRA EMERGENCY EARTHQUAKE REHABILITATION PROJECT MARCH 14, 1994 MICRCOGRAPHI CS Report No: P- 6262 IN Type: PE This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of March 14, 1994) Currency Unit = Rupees (Rs) Rs. 1.00 - US$0.032 US$1.00 = Rs. 31.20 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 foot = 0.3048 metres 1 mile = 1.6093 kilometres I square foot = 0.0929 square metres ABBREVIArIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB - Asian Development Bank CBRI - Central Building Research Institute CIG - Central Implementation Group GOI - Government of India GOM - Government of Maharashtra HUDCO - Housing and Urban Development Corporation ICB - International Competitive Bidding LCB - Local Competitive Bidding MMI - Modified Mercalli Intensity MOU - Memorandum of Understanding NGO - Non-Governmental Organization ODA - Overseas Development Administration, United Kingdom PCR - Project Completion Report PD - Project Director PMU - Program Management Unit PPAR - Project Performance Audit Report SCER - Secretary and Special Commissioner (Earthquake Relief and Rehabilitation) SOE - Statement of Expenditure TISS - Tata Institute for Social Sciences FISCAL YEAR April 1 - March 31  FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY INDIA MAHARASHTRA EMERGENCY EARTHQUAKE REHABILITATION PROJECT Credit and Project Summary Borrower: India, acting by its President Beneficiary: Government of Maharashtra (GOM), Government of India (GOI) Amount: SDR 177 million (US$246 million equivalent) Terms: Standard IDA terms, with 35 years maturity, including a 10-year grace period Onlending Terms: India to the Government of Maharashtra; part of the funds (SDR 171.4) in accordance with standard arrangements for developmental assistance to States Financing Plan: US$ millions IDA 246 GOM 40 GOI 1 Donors' 41 TOTAL 328 Economic Rate of Return: Not applicable Poverty Category: Not applicable Staff Appraisal Report: Not applicable Includes cofinancing of 10 million Pounds Sterling from the British government agreed in principle. Parallel financing of US$0.6 million for project implementation support from ADB has also been agreed in principle. The majority of the balance of the donors' funds will be provided by private donors, commercial organizations and leading NGOs. This document has a restricted distribution and mkay be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DLVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON THE PROPOSED CREDIT TO INDIA FOR THE MAIIARASIITRA EMERGENCY EARTHQUAKE REHABILITATION PROJECT 1. The following memorandum and recommendation on a proposed Credit of SDR 177 million (US$246 million equivalent) to the Government of India (GOI) is submitted for approval. It would support the Government of Maharashtra's (GOM) rehabilitatio. program for the victims of the earthquake at Killari, September 30, 1993. The proposed Credit would be on standard IDA terms, with a maturity of 35 years, including a grace period of ten years. The proceeds of the Credit would be passed on by the GOI to the GOM in accordance with its standard arrangements for developmental assistance to the states. The GOI will bear the foreign exchange risk. 2. Background. Maharashtra is the third largest state both in terms of land area (308,000 square kilometers) and population (78.7 million). It is the country's most heavily industrialized state with the highest percentage (35.7 percent) of state revenues coming from the industrial sector and a relatively low percentage coming from the agricultural sector (21.3 percent). The region where the earthquake occurred is agricultural with primary crops of mustard, sunflower oil, grapes and sugar cane. 3. On Thursday September 30, 1993, at 3:56 am, an earthquake of a magnitude 6.4 on the Richter scale shook the southeastern region of the State of Maharashtra. The epicenter was located at Killari in the Latur district, about 500 kilometers east of Bombay. Major damage occurred in villages within 20 kilometers of the epicenter. In the three worst-affected districts - Latur, Osmanabad and Solapur - 67 villages were severely damaged, and an estimated 8,0) people were killed and 16,000 injured. The homes of approximately 52,600 families were destroyed and another 180,000 were damaged. 4. There was limited damage to other infrastructure. However, the water supply was disrupted (the water table is said to have fallen in some areas and to have risen in others), electricity and telecommunication systems have sustained some minor damage, and some schools and public buildings collapsed or suffered damage. 5. The deaths were caused mainly by the collapse of traditional village houses that were of an extremely heavy construction. Typically, the walls were 2-3 feet thick and made of small stone boulders (about 1 foot in diameter) and bonded with dirt and clay. The stones were irregular in shape and therefore had relatively little binding and bearing capacity. The roofs were constructed with heavy wooden beams and a light framing covered with about 12-18 inches of dirt. During the quake, the walls shattered and the heavy roofs collapsed, crushing the sleeping residents. 6. Government Response. The combined response of the GOI and GOM to the disaster was rapid and effective. The GOM has also been commendably quick in making plans for reconstruction and it has managed to retain much of the momentum established by the relief operations. In addition to drawing up a program for IDA assistance, they have persuaded a  - 2 - number of commercial organizations, non-governrnental organizations (NGOs) and other donors to sponsor the reconstruction of a rumber of the smaller villages, totaling over 5,000 houses. Several of these organizations have made a quick start on constructing their designated villages. 7. IDA Response. The day after the earthquake, the Association offered to assist the Govermnent of India with reconstruction in the region affected by the earthquake. The offer of assistance was accepted by the GOI, and on October 5, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that established the framework for this Credit was signed. Simultaneously, an agreement was signed for a Project Preparation Facility (PPF).' 8. A reconnaissance mission from the India Department spent two days in the disaster area 10 days after the earthquake. This was followed by the pre-appraisal mission that visited India November 1-24, 1993, and the appraisal mission January 3-28, 1994. All three missions visited the earthquake affected districts. Negotiations for the Credit were held in Washington March 2- 9, 1994. 9. Country Assistance Strategy. The Bank's country assistance strategy (CAS) for India is designed to support the govern.ment's reform agenda through policy dialogue, based on intensive economic and sector work, and a lending program heavily weighted towards policy- based operations. Bank support is targeted to have a strong impact on poverty, one of India's most pressing problems. Infrastructure investments are aimed at expanding capacity and improving efficiency in both urban and rural areas. In addition the Bank is prepared to assist the country in financing reconstruction and rehabilitation works following natural disasters. The most recent CAS discussion for India was held on December 17, 1992. The CAS was presented in the President's Report on a Sector Adjustment Credit for the Social Safety Net Sector Adjustment dated November 30, 1992.2 10. Rationale for IDA Involvement. The Bank has extensive international experience in emergency reconstruction projects in many countries. In particular, several have been prepared in response to natural disasters in India, including the recent and successful Andhra Pradesh Cyclone Emergency Reconstruction Project.3 If the lessons learned can be effectively applied in this situation the Bank's involvement will have an important impact on how the reconstruction efforts are managed by the GOM. The community base and housing focus of this loan complements and supports the poverty objectives of the Bank's lending for India. 11. Project Objective'. The objectives of the project are: (a) to assist with rehabilitation and reconstruction in the earthquake-affected area (restoration of assets and basic services); (b) to increase the earthquake resistance of buildings and infrastructure through the development of improved standards for design and construction; and PiF of US$1.5 million was offered. About US$250,000 out of the PPF is expected to be used by Credit effectiveness. 2 A list of past and current Bank projects is included as Schedule D. 3 Report No P5363-IN of September 18, 1990 (Credit 2179-IN, Loan 3260-IN).  - 3 - (c) to develop the ability of the GOM to respond more effectively to natural disasters, including earthquakes. 12. Program Description. The GOM has developed a detailed rehabilitation and reconstruction program. It includes: (a) a housing component comprising the following: (i) the reconstruction ard rehabilitation on new relocation sites of about 49 villages that were totally destroyed - about 23,000 houses and associated infrastructure and civic amenities; (ii) the reconstruction on existing sites of about 30,000 houses that were destroyed or substantially damaged and the repair of about 180,000 partially damaged houses; and (iii) the construction of 500 model houses and a pilot strengthening program for about 5,000 vulnerable houses. (b) the repair, reconstruction and strengthening of public buildings and infrastructure (including schools, health centers, social service facilities, roads, bridges, irrigation facilities, public buildings, and historical monuments), and the improvement of transit shelters, including flooring, drainage and sanitation; (c) social rehabilitation with a particular emphasis on the needs of women and children; (d) economic rehabilitation (for the replacement of business losses); (e) community rehabilitation (the cost of works and materials to re-establish essential services); and (f) a program of technical assistance for the design, supervision and monitoring of project components, other consultancy services and equipment, including the development of a disaster management program for the State of Maharashtra, and a seismic monitoring and research program for the GOI. 13. Rehabilitation Policy and Community Participation. To provide a sound and equitable basis for the implementation of the program, the GOM has prepared a Rehabilitation Policy statement that has been agreed to by the Association. The policy establishes the entitlements for each village, household and individual for all programs, including rel'abilitation of housing, infrastructure, and community, social and economic activities. A baseiine survey has already been undertaken in the 49 villages proposed for relocation under the program as well as in 18 other villages where there was a high degree of damage. Given that the project does not involve tribal communities, hence OD 4.20 does not apply. OD 4.30 applies where land is  -4 - acquired for the resettlement villages. A rehabilitation action plan acceptable to IDA has been prepared by the GOM. 14. The program would be planned and implemented with the active participation of the affected communities, and the involvement of local NGOs wherever possible. Agreement has been reacbed on procedures to ensure adequate participation by the beneficiaries in all the villages, including publication of the policy and a clear explanation of who will benefit from it, and what their entitlements will be. Agreement has also been reached on appeals procedures ensuring that all complaints are promptly and fairly redressed. The first level of appeal will be to the District Collector and the second to the Secretary and Special Commissioner (Earthquake Relief and Rehabilitation) (SCER). 15. In the relocation villages, the houses and the gaotAan layouts would be designed with the active participation of the different social groups. The views of each identifiable group would be sought before reaching an agreement at village meeings. Every effort would be made to ensure that the resulting village and house designs reflect the needs and rural lifestyle of the people ir. the affected districts. 16. All families in the relocation villages would be provided with a plot of land and a core house of at least 250 square feet (internal floor area). Those with larger land holdings would be entitled to a larger house of either 400 or 750 square feet. For these larger houses, the incremental cost of the additional floor area above 250 square feet would be treated as a loan to the beneficiary and would be funded by the GOM. The Credit would finance only the core houses and 250-square feet of the larger houses. 17. The sites for 40 of the relocation villages have already been transferred by the landowners to the Government. However, so as to ensure that no individual's standard of living is adversely affected, a time-bound rehabilitation action plan has been developed to the satisfaction of the Association, so as to ensure that all appropriate rehabilitation measures are being taken. The action plan lists the individuals affected, describes the level of benefits available to them, lists other GOM and GOI programs available to mitigate any adverse impact of land acquisition, and provides grievance procedures, an estimate of the budget, and the details of the organization that will implement the plan. 18. House Construction. Given the relatively large size of these contracts, construction of the relocated villages would be by contractors, who will be encouraged to use local skilled and unskilled labor. Model houses would be built to demonstrate earthquake-resistant construction techniques and to facilitate the participatory process. Additionally, GOM would prepare an environmental statement for each relocation village. 19. The reconstruction and repair of the houses in-situ would be largely through a community-based construction process, controlled by the owners. The owners would be supported by technical personnel and the construction would be carried out by small contractors or village masons, stone cutters, carpenters and other village-based artisans, and assisted by non- skilled workers. The Program Management Unit (PMIJ) would develop guidelines for screening and maintaining a list of approved contractors and artisans, who will receive training in seismically-resistant construction techniques.  - 5 - 20. Before the houses are reconstructed or repaired on their existing sites, the extent of the damage to each house would be appraised by PMU staff assisted by qualified experts to determine the type and cost of reconstruction or repair. The GOM would provide grant assistance to repair these houses to the extent of the cost of repair, not exceeding the estimated cost of a 250-square foot core house (currently estimated at Rs. 54,000 (US$1,730)). Alternatively, owners could be provided with building materials through project-operated or private material depots. Funds would be made available through a village fund if the villagers so desire. The GOM has agreed to prepare a detailed action plan for the reconstruction and repair of houses in existing villages prior to the start of consrcution works for this component. 21. Ernvironmental Impact. This is a Category B project. It would raise the quality of the environment in the new villages above the standards to be found in the older villages in the region. The more generous provision of standpipes for drinking water and the twin-pit latrines in every dwelling unit would make a major contribution to the health and welfare of the local population. However, no project that involves the relocation of such a large number of people is expected to have only positive environmental impacts. To examine the potential environmental effects of each new village, the GOM has agreed to provide the Association with an environmental statement for each relocation village and to demonstrate how any adverse impacts would be mitigated. The issues to be addressed would include surface water drainage, water supply, sanitation, any reduction in the land available for agriculture and changes in the economic status of the farming population. 22. Social Issues. The local population was shocked by the earthquake and continues to be disturbed by the aftershocks. Throughout the region most people appear to have lost confidence in their old villages and want to move to earthquake-resistant houses in a new location. In many villages people are still living in temporary shelters because they are afraid of their old houses. Village relocation under this project is voluntary. 23. To minimize any negative impacts of the resettlement program the GOM has prepared and is in the process of publishing a full rehabilitation policy and has made arrangements for implementation plans to be discussed in each village. Appropriate appeals procedures have also been built in. The agreed planning process is community-based so as to ensure, as far as possible, that the designs of the new houses and villages are acceptable to the people who would live in them. Additionally, a rehabilitation action plan has been prepared to the satisfaction of the Association, to mitigate the effects of land acquisition for relocation villages. 24. The program also begins to address the problems caused by the loss of confidence of the local people in their old houses and in the traditional building materials. The project includes the construction of model houses and a pilot program for the strengthening of the traditional houses. It also includes a confidence-building program as a part of the component for developing a disaster management system. 25. Project Cost and Financing. The total project cost including contingencies is US$328 million (including taxes and duties of US$15 million), with an estimated foreign exchange component of US$33 million (10 percent). The project would be financed with an IDA Credit of US$246 million, a GOM contribution of US$40 million, and US$41 million from other donors, which includes cofinancing of 10 million Pounds Sterling from the British governmrent, agreed in principle. Separate parallel financing of US$0.6 million from the Asian Development  -6 - Bank (ADB) has also been agreed in principle. The GOI would contribute US$1 million to the earthquake monitoring and research component. A summary of program costs and a financing plan are presented in Schedule A.4 26. When the MOU was signed on October 5, 1993, retroactive financing was offered for eligible expenditures made during the period between the date of the disaster and loan signature. The GOM proposes to use this financing, up to a maximum. of SDR 10 million (about US$14 million equivalent), to cover the cost of works and materials procured after the disaster and used for community rehabilitation. 27. Implementation. The project would be implemented over a three-year period with a Credit closing date of June 30, 1997. A list of key dates is provided in Schedule C. 28. The project would be implemented by a Program Management Unit (PMU), headed by the SCER who would also be the nominated Project Director (PD). The PD has been delegated full administrative and financial powers to facilitate speedy implementation and will be assisted by a team of management consultants and other technical experts to ensure that outputs are delivered timely and as planned. The PD will also be supported by a Chief Engineer and other technical staff recruited to the PMU from government departments. The PMU will use consultant services extensively for preparation and supervision of works. Independent quality assurance and technical audit arrangements would be put in place. The PMU will dissolve upon completion of the program. 29. The PMU will be overseen by the Central Implementation Group (CIG) under the chairmanship of the Chief Secietary. Policy directives will be provided by a Cabinet subcommittee headed by the Chief Minister of Maharashtra. The Association has reviewed the program management plan and found it satisfactory. 30. Procuirement and Disbursement. Procurement of works, goods and services would be in accordance with IDA guidelines using documentation satisfactory to the Association. Due to the small size and the wide spatial distribution of civil works contracts, these would be executed through local competitive bidding procedures (LCB) acceptable to the Association. The majority of the in-situ house reconstruction and repair work would be community based and carried out thr3ugh small local contractors and NGOs. Small works and those of an emergency nature would be done through force account or rates contracts. Contracts for equipment, materials and vehicles costing US$200,000 or more would be procured under ICB procedures. Smaller contracts for works and equipment could be procured using local procedures acceptable to the Association. Local shopping would be used for the purchase of livestock and selected equipment costing than less than US$500 and US$50,000 respectively, up to a total of US$4 million. All consultants would be contracted in accordance with the IDA guidelines. Amounts and methods of procurement, amounts of disbursement by category and the disbursement schedule are provided in Schedule B. 31. The IDA Credit of US$246 million would finance 75 percent of the housing and other civil works; 100 percent of foreign expenditures and 100 percent of local ex-factory expenditures 4 An additional USS4 million will be provided by the Second Maharashtra Power Project (Loan 3498-IN).  for materials and equipment under ICB procurement, and 80 percent of local expenditures for other materials and equipment procured locally; 100 percent of technical assistance and traininv; and 75 percent of recurrent expenditures for selected social programs and incremental costs for the PMU. 32. A Special Account would be established in US dollars in the Reserve Bank of India with an initial deposit of US$20 million from which project expenditures would be reimbursed. Throughout the life of the project, the GOI would advance to the GOM about three months worth of anticipated expenditures. After each advance, the GOM would in turn promptly advance these funds to the agencies implementing each component of the project. 33. Benefits. The project would bring immediate and sustained economic and social benefits to the region affected by the earthquake. Over 200,000 families or about one million persons would benefit from the program. It would build on the ielief measures already started by the GOI and the GOM and would benefit from the continued momentum of the rehabilitation program. It would rebuild the housing destroyed by the disaster, give an important boost to the local economy, and provide employment opportunities to the local residents. Additionally, the project would give economic and social support to disadvantaged sections of the community, particularly women and children. Long-term benefits would be derived from the strengthening of infrastructure and housing in the region and from the development of a disaster management program, and seismic monitoring and research. 34. Risks and Lessons Learned from Bank Fxperience. The Andhra Pradesh Cycione Emergency Reconstruction Project demonstrated the importance of focusing early in the project cycle on procurement procedures and contract documentation.5 It also demonstrated the importance of establishing a strong project management team with a high degree of delegated authority. For housing reconstruction projects, the Mexico Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Project emphasized the importance of involving the beneficiaries in the plann :g and implementation of the reconstruction process as well as the need to establish a strong implementation agency.6 In addition, a more general review of the Bank's emergency housing projects suggests that land acquisition problems, inappropriate or complicated housing designs, and problems with material availability are also potential constraints to the success of a project.7 35. When preparing this project each of the potential constraints has been addressed. A strong program management structure has been established with community participation built in as an integral part of the planning and implementation processes. Other factors such as land, materials availability and the design of the villages and houses have also been of mutual concern for IDA and the GOM. However, despite these efforts, substantial risks remain. These may be grouped in four categories - project preparation, technical, management and implementation. (a) Project Preparation Risk. Almost by definition, no emergency project is likely to be as well prepared as a regular Bank project. Because of the short time S Report No P5363-IN of September 18, 1990 (Credit 2179-IN, Loan 3260-IN). 6 Report No 12149 - Performance Audit Report (Loan 2665-ME). 7 Alcira Kreimer, Rebuilding Housing in Emergency Recovery Projects, Divisional Wo.king Papcr No. 1990-17, Environment Department, World Bank, December 1990.  - 8 - available much greater emphasis must be given during preparation and ay)proval phase to establishing appropriate design and implementation proces-es. To minimize preparation risks in this project, a procurement plan and a program management plan have been prepared and agreed on, including the appointment of consultants to assist with project prepa ;Aion and implementation. In addition, contract documentation has been prepared and approved for a large proportion of the infrastructure rehabilitation component and for five of the relocation villages. (b) Technical Risk. Rebuilding in a proven earthquake zone can never be risk free. Although the expert advice available within India on seismic engineering issues is of a high quality, it has been agreed that the GOI and the GOM would engage the services of international experts to complement local expertise. (c) Management Risk. A major risk is that the GOM will fail to manage the program effectively or implement it in a timely fashion. The GOM has already demonstrated a high level of commitment to the program, and has taken steps to establish and staff the PMU. (d) Implementation Risks. The community base of this project is both a strength and a weakness. It should ensure community ownership of the project and that all house and village construction financed by the project is acceptable to the people. However, the very large in-situ house reconstruction and repair component will be very difficult to manage, given the need for owners to take responsibility for the repair of their own houses, even if they are provided with material and appropriate technical support. A detailed implementation plan will be agreed for this component prior to construction works beginning for this component. 36. Supervision. This project will require intensive IDA supervision, especially during the first year of implementation. Th,e budgeted staff inputs are 12 weeks in FY94, 30 weeks in FY95, 20 weeks in FY96, 15 weeks in FY97 and 7 weeks in FY98. The designated Task Manager is resident in the World Bank New Delhi office. 37. Actions Agreed. The following have been agreed by IDA and the GOM: (a) a rehabilitation policy statement - this is being published to provide a framewoik for the earthquake rehabilitation program; (b) a program management plan including staffing, consultant inputs and powers delegated to the PMU; (c) a procurement plan, procurement procedures, and procedures for the preparation of the environmental statements; (d) design and supervision of construction of all housing work - the GOM has agreed that this will be to the standards satisfactory to the Association;  -9 - (e) relocation villages - (i) the size of the program; (ii) the process for community participation; (iii) the procedures for the design and supervision of all housing work; (iv) the GOM would prepare a computerized database including the building damage and the baseline social data: (v) the GOM would prepare and publish lists of beneficiaries in each village; and (vi) the GOM would prepare and publish a comprehensive rehabilitation program for each village. The Association has also reviewed the designs and contract documentation for the first five relocation villages and found them satisfactory. The GOM has agreed that construction, contract drawings and documentation of all other relocation villages will be of a similar standard; (f) a rehabilitation action plan to mitigate any adverse effects of the land acquisition for the relocation villages - this plan was prepared to the satisfaction of the Association, and the GOM has agreed to implement it in a timely manner for each relocation village; (g) the villages to be rehabilitated in-situ - the GOM has agreed that construction work in these villages will not begin before they provide the Association with a detailed implementation plan for this sub-component; additionally, the following were agreed: (i) the limits of the program; (ii) that the GOM will prepare a computerized database for each village, including the damage survey and the proposed social survey data; (iii) that the GOM will prepare and publish a rehabilitation program for each village; (iv) that the GOM will prepare and publish the lists of beneficiaries in each village; (v) in terms of the repair of the damaged houses, it was agreed that the works will begin only after the appointment of seismic engineering experts, the social surveys for about 100 villages have been undertaken, detailed surveys including damage assessment have been carried out with design solutions and cost estimates, properly trained technicians (including engineering supervisory staff, and village-based masons, carpenters and other artisans) have been deployed; (h) to establish an independent Dam Safety Review Panel to review the proposals for the strengthening of large dams; and (i) The GOM has agreed that an indepei.dent quality assurance and technical audit group wiHl be established, reporting to the CIG and the PD. 38. IDA and the GOI agreed that the GOI will establish an Advisory Group with international participation to advise on the design and implementation of the earthquake monitoring and research component. 39. Conditions for Credit Effectiveness. Compliance with the following would be a condition for Credit effectiveness: (a) appointment of the key design and management consultants agreed at negotiations; and (b) the submission of the program implementation plan.  - 10 - 40. Recommendation. I am satisfied that the proposed Credit would comply with the Articles and Agreements of the Association and recommend that the Executive Directors approve the proposed Credit. Lewis 'r. Preston President Attachments Washington D.C. March 14, 1994  Schedule A Page I of 2 INDIA: MAHARASHTRA EMIERGENCY EARTHQUAKE REEABILITATION PROJECT Program Summary Cost Si. US$ million Rs. million No. Project Component Local Foreign Total Local Foreign Total 1. Housing 144.3 15.6 159.9 4773.5 522.5 5296.0 2. Infrastructure 64.9 6.8 71.7 2135.5 235.7 2371.2 3. Social Rehabilitation 10.0 0.7 10.7 327.4 35.7 363.1 4. Economic Rehabilitation 4.8 0.3 5.1 150.9 16.8 167.7 5. Community Rehabilitation 7.7 0.9 8.6 250.5 27.8 278.3 6. Technical Assistance, Training and Equipment Project Preparation and Implementation Support 2.6 0.5 3.1 85.1 14.9 100.0 Incremental Cost of PMU 2.6 0.4 3.0 85.0 15.0 100.0 Training and Study Tours 1.6 - 1.6 50.0 - 50.0 Materials and Equipment: State Level 2.4 0.2 2.6 75.6 8.4 84.0 Materials and Equipment: Central Level 3.0 4.5 7.5 100.0 150.0 250.0 Recurring Costs of Social Services 0.4 - 0.4 12.0 - 12.0 Sub Total 244.3 29.9 274.2 8045.5 1026.8 9072.3 Physical Contingencies 6.0 0.1 6.1 178.5 19.0 197.5 Design, Supervision & Management 13.6 1.2 14.8 443.8 52.0 495.8 Price Contingencies 31.2 1.5 32.7 1030.5 73.7 1104.2 Total 295.1 32.7 327.8 9698.3 1171.5 10869.8 Note: Includes taxes and duties estimated at US$15 million.  INDIA: MAHARASHTRA EMERGENCY EARTHQUAKE REHABELITATION PROJECT Schedule A Page 2 of 2 Fiancing Plan (US$ milion) IDA GOM GOI Donor Total Housing 140.9 24.8 - 25.4 191.1 Infrastructure 65.4 10.1 - 14.4 89.9 Community Rehabilitation 8.0 - - 1.3 9.3 Social Rehabilitation 8.8 2.8 - - 11.6 Economic Rehabilitation 4.8 0.8 - 5.6 Technical Assistance, Training and Equipment Materials and Equipment 10.1 0.2 1.0 - 11.3 Preparation and Implementation Support 3.4 - - - 3.4 Training 1.8 - - 1.8 Incremental Salaries and Recurring Costs 2.8 1.0 - - 3.8 Total 246 39.7 1.0 41.1 327.8 Share 75% 12% 0.50% 12.5% 100% Note: Includes taxes and duties esfimated at US$15 million.  Schedule B Page I of 2 INDIAs MAHARASHTRA EMERGENCY EARTHQUAKE REHABIUTATION PROJECT Prom ent Method and Disbursanents (USS mfion) Category ICB LCB Other N/A Total Relocation Villages 72.7 15.40 (54.4) (0.0) In-Situ Housing 14.0 27.2 (10.5) (15.4) Small and Emergency Works 7.7 (5.1) Other Infrastructure and Buildings