India - Karnataka Rural Water Supply and Environmental Sanitation Project

Document of The World Bank FOR OFICIAL USE ONLY C9Z~C~ 2ff3 /A/ Rqwt NQ P-5975-IN MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMDATION t OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPME ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSED CREDIT OF SDR 66.3 MILLION (US$92 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO INDIA FOR A KARNTAKL RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND ENVIRONMENAL SANITATION PROJECT MARCH 31, 1993 . . I~I 'A ~ ~~1A Ai This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the perfornance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit - Indian Rupee (Rs.) US$ 1.00 Rs. 31 Rs. 1.00 US$ 0.032 1 Lakh Rs. 100 000 1 Crore Rs. 10 million ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRNYMS 60K - Government of Karnataka NGO - Non-Governmental Organization 011 - Operation & Maintenance PEND - Public Health Engineering Department PFIU - Project Planning and Monitoring Unit ZP - Zilla Parishad (District Council) 1ped - liters per capita per day OOK FISCAL YEAR April 1 - March 31  FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY INDIA KARNATAKA RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION PROJECT Credit and Prsjgct Summary Borrower: India, acting by its President Beneficiary: State of Karnataka Amoutnt: SDR 66.3 million (US$92 million equivalent) Terms: Standard, with 35 years maturity, 10 years grace period Onj..nding Terms: Not applicable Financine Plan: Local Foreign Total OOK 16.8 - 16.8 Communities 9.0 - 9.0 IDA 77 15.0 92.0 TOTAL (US$ million) 102.8 15.0 117.8 Economic Rate of Return: Not applicable Staff Appraisal Report: Report No. 11450-IN MDg: IBRD No. 24219 This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  MEMORANDUM AND RECONIENDATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ON A PROPOSED CREDIT TO INDIA FOR A KARNATAKA RURAL WATER SUPPLY & ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION PROJECT 1. The following memorandum and recommendation for a proposed development credit to India for SDR 66.3 million (US$92 million equivalent) is submitted for approval. The proposed credit would be on standard IDA terms with 35 years maturity and help finance a rural water supply and environmental sanitation project in the State of Karnataka. 2. Background. Over the past ten years, India has made a major investment in developing rural water supplies. As a result, it is estimated that about 95% of all villages in India now have accass to at least one safe drinking water source. However, this supply of water is not adequate to meet the demand within villages and the rural population is still using unsafe water to a large extent. On the environmental/sanitation side, less ambitious programs have been made available to promote latrine usage among the lower income groups in rural areas. These programs have been largely unsuccessful due to insufficient public health education. As a result, less than 3% of the rural population use latrines. 3. Additionally, public facilities for drainage are poor. As a result of lack of clean water and environmental saritation, water related diseases are a major health problem. This is especially true for infants and children of whom over 80% are adversely affected annually. This results in infant mortality rates in rural areas two-thirds higher than those in urban areas. Providing a reliable domestic water supply, linked to improved environmental sanitation and health education would be important factors in improving health standards and economic productivity in rural areas. 4. Under the Eightin Five-Year-Plan, the central government is emphasizing the consolidation of rural water supply coverage to improve service levels, greater community participation in operation and maintenance (O&M) and improved water quality surveillance. The plan also proposes a new strategy linking health education to sanitation and water supply. The proposed project would support the new approaches being adopted by the central government under the five-year-plan. 5. Previous Bank Experience and Lessons Learned. The Bank has one on- going project, the Maharashtra Rural Water Supply anid Environmental Sanitation Project (Credit 2234-IN), which combines rural water supply, health education and environmental sanitation in one investment package. It just became effective in July 1991, so our experience to date has been limited. While the Bank has not financed any other free-standing rural water supply projects in India, it has financed six urban water supply and sewerage projects in the states of Gujarat, Kerala, Maharashtra, Rahjasthan, Tamil Nadu and Uttar Pradesh. The projects in Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh have been completed and Project Performance Audit Reports have been prepared. 6. The main lessons learned from audited projects are: (a) adequate project preparation before appraisal, including detailed engineering design is  essential; (b) financial and institutional strengthening targets need to be realistic; (c) cost recovery has been insufficient and needs to be improved to ensure sustainable operations; (d) the number of contracts should be reduced to simplify the procurement process; (e) improvements in construction quality can be achieved by prequalifying contractors and monitoring construction supervision; and (f) more use should be made of the private sector (consultants) in project preparation and implementation in order to avoid delays and excessive Bank supervision input. In eddition, the initial lessons learned from the on-going Maharashtra Rural Water Supply and Environmental Sanitation Project are: (a) the need for establishment of an empowered committee in order to avoid delays in project awards and other essential decisions; (b) the development of innovative community participation approaches, in particular the formation of village committees, should begin on a pilot basis during preparation; and (c) the need to increase the subsidy share for the construction of sullage drain&ge (from 50% to 70%) in order to reduce the risk this component would fail due to lack of counterpart funds from the community. The lessons learned from the audited and on-going projects have been incorporated into this proposed project. 7. Rationale for IDA Involvement. The proposed project would directly support IDA's strategy to improve the health and living standards of low income people, particularly, the rural poor. In addition, it would encourage mcre involvement of Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) and women in the sector, through their participation in project planning and implementation. Women, in particular, would benefit from the project through improved access to domestic water supply sources. This, in turn, would give them more time to participate in economically productive activities. Also, IDA involvement is likely to strengthen the State government's resolve to improve cost recovery for O&M. Although other donors are active ir the sector, the scale of their financial i.vestment is small and IDA would promote coordination among donors. 8. Project Objectives. The main objective of the project is to raise the standard of living in rural areas through improved health and productivity. These result from improved access to potable rural water supply systems and environmental sanitation facilities. These improvements would be achieved through promotion of the following specific objectives: (a) more equitable distribution of safe water via improved design standards and community involvement in the siting of standposts and handpumps; (b) increased suatainability of water supply and drainage schemes through additional cost recovery for O&M and greater involvement of the community in maintenance; (c) expanded public and private investment in environmental sanitation through programs focusing on latrine usage and the provision of sullage drains; and (d) greater community awareness of the causes of water-related health problems and the need for a cleaner environment through a health communications program targeting women, adolescents, and children. This project would also develop replicable models for coordinating water, environmental sanitation and health communications programs for other areas of the state and country. 9. Project DescriRtion. The proposed project would be implemented in about 12 districts in Karnataka and cover approximately 1,200 villages (250 in phase 1, 750 in phase 2 and balance in phase 3) with an estimated population of 4.8 million. The project would comprise the following four components: (a) Rural Water Supply, (base costs US$63 million) including construction of new and rehabilitation of existing water supply schemes in 1,200 villages, assistance for Public Health Engineering Department's (PHED) borewell program, leakage repair  works, a water quality control program and measures for groundwater recharge; (b) Environmental Sanitation, (base costs US$26 million) consisting of construction of environmental sanitation facilities includin. sullage drainage and, on a demand basis, pit latrines, washing platforms, cattle troughs, bathing cubicles, street bins and bio-gas plants; (c) Injtittin Building and Project Supprt, (base costs US$15 million) including community development programs for creation of village water supply and sanitation committees, comprehensive training programs and strengthening of the project management, Public Health Engineering Department (PHED) and Zilla Pariahads (ZPs); and (d) Health Coommuicatlo , (base costs US$1 million) covering training programs to create greater community awareness and demand for improved hygiene and environmental sanitation. NGOs vould play a major role in the community development and health communication programs. * 10. Village Selection Criteria. The villages to be served under this project are being selected in accordance with criteria developed by GOK and GOI. Villages with less than 10 liters per capita per day (lpcd) supply would be given first priority. Second priority would be given to villages with less than 20 lpcd, etc.. All selected villages )-tve less than 40 lpcd water supply and face acute water scarcity in the dry season. High priority also would be given to villages with serious water-related health problems such as guinea worm, fluorosis, hepatitis, cholera and gastroenteritis, and villages without adequate groundwater sources which require regional water supply schemes. 11. Proiect Costs. The total project cost is estimated at US$118 million; the proposed IDA credit of US$92 million equivalent woull cover about 87% of costs, net of taxes and duties. The GOK would finance US$17 million and the communities' contributions for latrines and drainage would be US$9 million. A breakdown of costs and the financing plan are shown in Schedule A. Retroactive financing up to US$1.7 million would be provided for eligible expenditures made after April 1992 in order to facilitate timely project start-up. Amounts and methods of procurement and disbursements as well as the disbursement schedule are shown in Schedule B. The Timetable of Key Processing Events and the Status of the Bank Group Operations in India are given in Schedules C and D. 12. Main Protect Conditionalities. During negotiations, assurances have been received that: (i) GOK would: (a) prepare guidelines, satisfactory to IDA, based on experiences learned from the pilot schemes, to be used for implementing the community participation activities of the project; (b) appoint and maintain necessary qualified staff and provide funds to meet all recurrent costs for effectively operating the water quality monitoring system in the 12 project districts; (c) make arrangements satisfactory to the Association with the Mandals to set and collect water and drainage tariffs; (d) agree on draft regulations for establishment and operation of Village Water Supply and Sanitation Cofmittees (WSC); (e) award no later than September 30, 1993, contracts to consultants and non-governmental organizations, for promoting community participation in planning of water supply and environmental sanitation works to be carried in the second phase of the Project; and (f) award consultants contracts for supervision of construction fok the second phase of works to be undertaken under the  - 4 - Project, prior to award of contracts for the commencement of said works; and (ii) as a Condition of Effectiveness, GOK would: (a) appoint key staff of PPMU, PHED, and ZPs; (b) award consultants contracts for health communication, training, final design (phase 2), and construction supervision (phase 1); and (c) issue regulations setting out procedures for establishment of VWSCs. 13. Environmental Aspects. The environmental classification for the project is Category "B". The provision of a safe and reliable water supply plus improved environmental sanitation facilities, related health education and enhanced community awareness of the importance of a clean environment are expected to have a positive environmental impact on the lives of people in the rural areas. Also the project would strengthen the State's capacity to monitor water quality for bacterial, mineral and chemical contamination. The projeet is not expected to have any adverse impact on the environment. Although the share of tribal population in the project is low (5% of the population), steps will be taken to ensure that special efforts are made by the social survey and community participation consultant to consult with the tribal communities to seek their active participation in the design and implementation of the project. Special attention will also be paid to scheduled caste population in the project villages to ensure their unrestricted access to the water supply facilities. 14. Project Benefits. The project is expected to benefit about 1,z00 villages encompassing 4.8 million people. About 40% of the population to be served are currently below the poverty line. The main benefit would be the reduction in the incidence of water-related diseases. This would lead to reduced morbidity and mortality, higher productivity, and more available water for daily domestic use. The project would also result in time saved, by women, in collecting water. It would also give communities more responsibility for their own services which should lead to improved maintenance and operations. 15. Risks. The construction of the water supply facilities in the villages is expected to be straightforward. However, there is the risk that the environmental sanitation and health communications components may be given lower priority in implementation and, thus the full impact of the integrated approach may not be realized. This risk will be minimized by the monitoring role of the Project Planning and Monitoring Unit, the use of NGOs and consultants for community development and health communication, and the formation of village water and sanitation committees. In addition, the sustainability of investments in rural water supply would be at risk if there were inadequate institutional and funding arrangements for O&M. This risk would be minimized through measures to: (a) upgrade local skill levels through training; (b) strengthen administrative arrangements by which communities assume responsibility for O&; (c) maximize revenues through design improvements and provision of house connections; and (d) clearly identify subsidies required in the poorest areas.  16. Recommendation. I am satisfied that th_ proposed credit would comply with the Articles of Agreement of Association and recommend that the Executive Directors approve the proposed credit. Lewis T. Preston President Attachments Washington, D.C. Date: March 31, 1993  -6 ScebduleA INDIA KARNATAKA RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION PROJECT Estimated Costs and F ncirgPlan (US$ million) Components Local Foreign Total Rural Water Supply 53.5 9.4 62.9 Environmental Sanitation 24.7 1.4 26.1 Institutional Building and Project Support 13.4 1.5 14.9 Health Communication 0.9 0.1 1-. Total Base Cost 92.5 12.4 104.9 Physical contingencies 7.8 1.0 8.8 Price contingencies 2.5 .1A-.6.0 Total Project Cost 102.8 15.0 117.8 Note: The above costs include an estimated US$11.0 million in taxes and duties. Finaning-Plan Local Foreig Total i Government 16.8 - 16.8 15 Communities1 9.0 - 9.0 7 IDA 77.Q 15.0 92.0 78 Total 102.8 15.0 117.8 100 1 The communities would finance 30% of the works for sullage drainage and bathing cubicles either in cash, kind or labor and about 50% of the coat for pit latrines.  7- Schedule A Page 1 of 2 KAPNA RURAL I SUPLY An ENVIRONMENTAL MSAITATO- PROJECT P Method and Disbursements (US$ million) PROCURMSNT COlWOUS ProcureI nt Method TOTAL ICB LCB OTMCR NIP COST Water Supply 45.82 - - 45.82 (40.25) (40.25) Dorewll Pram - 2.86 5.29(1) 6 8.15 (2.40) (4.30) (6.70) Groundw Recharge -- 10.33(1) - 10.33 (9.10) (9.10) :Sw. Sanitatio - 21.37 ?.81 (1) - 29.18 (13.30) (3.40) (16.70) 600DSs 5.40 1.22 0.41(2) - 7.03 (4.00) (0.30) (0.32) (5.22) I!ROAlt:SalpaonS. Scheme Designs 2.42 - - 2.42 (2.10) (2.10) liugee - - 3.96(3) - 3.96 (3.00) (3.00) Construction Supervision 3.47 3.47 (3.20) (3.20) Leak Detectin Sutrey 0.25 0.66 - - 0.91 (0.18) (0.55) (0.73) Special Studies 0.39 _ _ - 0.39 (0.25) (0.25) asmxa C"NwC S Training Materialslquilpt - 2.48 - - 2.48 (2.35) (2.35) Comity Participation - 1.95 - - 1.95 (1.60) (1.60) Eealth ComwuniatLoft - 1.09 1.09 (0.80) (0.80) PYEIZP - - .02 .02 (.00) (.00) tAurD AYXJJrS]nXNgs - - - .54 .54 (.00) (.00) TOTAL 6.04 83.34 27.80 .56 117.74 ( 4.43) (67.45) (20.12) (.00) (92.00) Note: Figures la parentheses are the amOUts to be financed by the credit. All otber figures Lnclude duties and taes, physical and price contingencies. NIP means not IDA financed. 'C0nIU includes (1)force account work organised with departmental labor or loeally employed Labor, (2)Local or LAt,&ational shopping and (3)Gaver=ment staff cost.  -8- Schotule -A Page 2 of 2 Disbursexent Categories % of Expenditure Categgoy to be Disbursed (1) Civil works 90% of expenditures (2) Equipment and materials 100% of foreign expenditures 100% of local expenditures ex-factory 804 of other local expenditures (3) Consultants 100% of expenditures Estimated Disbursements IDA 1994 1995 1996 199 7 199 8 1920 Annual 8.2 16.0 20.5 21.3 18.6 6.1 1.3 Cumulative 8.2 24.2 44.7 66.0 84.6 90.7 92.0  -9- Scbedule C INDI KAJRNATAIWA RURALATER SUPPLY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION PROJECT Timetable of Key Project Processing Events (a) Time taken to prepare the project: Two years (approximately) (b) Prepared by: Government of Karnataka and the Bank (c) First IDA mission: March 1989 (d) Appraisal mission departure: October 1992 (e) Negotiations: March 8, 1993 (f) Planned date of effectiveness: June 30, 1993  -10- SCHEDULE D PACE 1 of 5 THE STATUS OF BANK GROUP OPERATIONS IN INDIA A. STATEMENT OF BANK LOANS AND IDA CREDITS (As of December S1, 1992) USSa MlIIon (not of eancellatlons) Loan or Fiscal Year ----- --------- --------- Credit No.of Appr Purpose IORD IDA 1/ Undtsbursed 2/ -- -- -- - -- - ------------- - -- - --e---- - - 1/ 94 Loans/ 6998.3 1/ 162 Credits fully disbursed/cancelled 12314.5 2295-IN 1983 Himalayan Watershed Management 30.20 - 2.09 13S-IN 1983 Upper Indravati Hydro Power - 170.00 23.34 2403-IN 1984 Cambay Basin Petroleum 213.60 - 12.82 2393-IN 1984 Dudhiehua Coal 109.00 - 16.50 2442-IN 1984 Farakka II Thermal Power 278.80 - 58.80 1496-IN 1984 Gujarat Medium Irrigatlon - 186.30 39.99 2416-IN 1984 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric 17.43 - 8.94 SF-20-IN 1984 Indirt Sarovar Hydroelectric - 13.84 17.19 2415-IN 1984 Madhya Prsdesh Fertilizer 167.10 - 0.94 2387-IN 1984 Nhava Sheva Port 260.00 - 19.28 SF-1S-IN 1984 Perlyar Vaigal II Irrigation - 17.S0 8.82 1426-IN 1984 Population III - 70.00 1.06 2417-IN 1984 Railways Electrificatlon 279.20 - 19.85 1424-IN 1984 Rasnfed Areas Watershed Dev. - 26.62 15.04 SF-12-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - 58.60 17.32 14S4-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - s8.50 19.87 1483-IN 1984 Upper Canga Irrlgation - 106.43 40.67 1544-IN 1986 Bombay Urban Development - 100.92 37.18 2544-IN 198S Chandrapur Thermal Power 280.00 - 94.08 1813-IN 1985 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric - 13.20 17.06 2498-IN 1985 Jharla Coking Coal 67.70 - 6.08 2582-IN 1986 Kerala Power 178.00 - 130.78 1514-IN 1985 Kerala Social Forestry - 27.12 3.93 2497-IN 1985 Namarda (Gujarat) Dam and Powtr 200.00 - 199.74 1523-IN 1985 National Agric. Extension I - 33.02 4.79 2534-IN 1986 National Highways 163.00 - 80.99 lell-IN 1985 National Social Forestry - 154.09 12.08 2555-IN 1985 Rihand Power Transmisslon 202.00 - 8.81 1589-IN 1985 Second National Agricultural Ext. - 45.39 18.19 2662-IN 1988 Andhra Pradesh 1I Irrigation 41.00 - 41.00 1665-IN 1986 Andhra Pradesh II Irrigation - 140.00 117.3S 2860-IN 1986 Cement Industry 165.00 - 57.87 2674-IN 1986 Combined Cycle Power 485.00 - 28.49 2730-IN 1986 Cooperative Fertilizer 118.26 - 18.70 1643-IN 1988 Cujarat Urban - 50.34 28.68 2661-IN 1986 ICICI - Cement Industry 35.00 - 13.44 1622-IN 1988 Kerala Water Supply and Sanitation - 21.80 7.64 1621-IN 1986 Maharashtra Composite Irrigatlon - 180.00 170.35 1831-IN 1986 National Agricultural Research II - 59.88 35.18 16l9-IN 1988 West Bengal Minor Irrigation - 89.17 84.30 1823-IN 1986 West Bengal Population - 45.85 12.82 pt37-IN 1987 Bihar Tubewells - 22.29 8.64 11So-IN 1987 Bombay Water Supply A Sewerage III - 146.00 89.20 2769-IN 1987 Bombay Wator Supply A Swerage III 40.00 - 40.00 2798-IN 1987 Coal Mining & quality Improvement 340.00 - 117.26 1757-IN 1987 Gujarat Rural Roads - 119.60 90.35 2827-IN 1987 Karnataka Power 260.00 - 190.11 2848-IN 1987 Madras Water Supply 53.00 - 35.50 1754-IN 1987 National Agric. Extension IrI - 70.18 39.54 2e44-IN 1987 National Capital Power 425.00 - 179.38  -ll- SCHEDULE D ___________ PAGE 2 of S USX Mlion (net of cencella'.lons) Loan or Fiscal Year ---------________________ ________ Credit No.of Appr Purpose lORD IDA 1/ Undisturs64 2/ ______________- ___------------------------_---_________________ -____ __________ -_______--- 1770-IN 1987 Natienal Water Management - 114.00 88.82 2785-IN 1987 Oil India Petroleum 140.00 - 27.42 2845-IN 1987 Talcher Thermal 375.00 _ 282.51 2813-IN 1987 Telecommunicatlons IX 184.60 - 8.83 1780-IN 1987 Uttar Pradesh Urban Development - 120.95 73.S3 1931-IN 1988 Bombay a Madras Population - 57.00 16.87 2928-IN 1988 Indus. Fin. A Tech. Asst. 360.00 - 55.20 2938-IN 1988 Karnataka Power II 220.00 - 182.35 1ss9-IN 1988 National Dairy II - 180.00 19.97 2893-IN 1988 National Dairy 11 200.00 - 200.00 2935-IN 1988 Railway Modernization III 390.00 - 202.15 1923-IN 1988 Tamil Nadu Urban Dev. - 269.69 172.52 3093-IN 1989 Electronics Industry D-v. 8.00 - 7.50 3OS8-IN 1989 Export Development 120.00 - 45.81 3094-IN 1989 ICICI - Electronics Ind. 0Ov. 101.00 - 43.15 3OS9-IN 1989 ICICI - Export Development 175.00 - 85.85 3095-IN 1989 1061 - Electronics Ind. Dev. 101.00 - 75.65 3096-IN 1989 Maharashtra Power 354.00 - 322.33 3024-IN 1989 Nathpa Jhakri Power 48s.00 - 447.98 19s2-IN 1989 National Seeds III - 150.00 102.74 2022-IN 1989 National Sericulture - 147.00 110.17 2057-IN 1989 Nat'l. Family Welfare Trng. - 113.30 93.73 3044-IN 1989 Petroleum Transport 340.00 - 305.00 1959-IN 1989 States Roads - 80.00 38.28 2994-IN 1989 States Roads 170.00 - 170.00 3050-IN 1989 Upper Krishna Irrigatlon II 85.00 - 85.00 2010-IN 1989 Upper Krishna Irrigation II - 160.00 115.24 2008-IN 1989 Vocational Training - 211.02 189.38 3196-IN 1990 Cement Industry Restructuring 300.00 - 266.08 2115-IN 1990 Hyderabad Water Supply - 79.90 67.54 2064-IN 1990 Industrial Technology Development - 55.00 52.7S 3119-IN 1990 Industrial Technology Development 145.00 - 100.29 3237-IN 1990 Northern Region Transmission 485.00 - 454.57 2133-IN 1990 Population Training VII - 81.92 75.44 3239-IN 1990 Private Power Utilitles I (TEC) 98.00 - 84.69 2076-IN 1990 Punjab Irrigation/Drainage - 145.28 127.04 2158-IN 1990 Tamil Nadu Integrated Nutrition II - 88.1S 80.94 2130-IN 1990 Technician Education I - 210.74 184.17 2100-IN 1990 Watershed Doevelopment (Hllls) - 75.00 66.9s 2131-IN 1990 Watershed Development (Plains) - 65.00 55.21 3260-IN 1991 A.P. Cyclone Emergency Reconstruction 40.00 - 40.00 2179-IN 1991 A.P. Cyclone Emergency Reconstruction - 170.00 82.12 > 2241-IN 1991 Dam Safety - 130.00 122.66 3325-IN 1991 Dam Safety 23.00 - 23.00 3364-IN 1991 Gas Flaring Reduction 450.00 - 343.84 2173-IN 1991 ICOS I (Orissa A Andhra Pradesh) - 96.00 85.82 22S2-IN 1991 Industrial Pollution Control - 31.60 30.19 3334-IN 1991 Industrial Pollutlon Control 124.00 - 114.80 2234-iT 1991 Uaharashtra Rural Water Supply - 109.90 97.84 3258-IN 1991 Petrochemicals II 12.00 - 11.00 3259-IN 1991 Petrochemicals II 233.00 - 159.63 3344-IN 1991 Private Power Utilities II (8SES) 200.00 - 149.04 45S-IN 1991 Tamil Nadu Agricultural Development - 92.80 81.17 8300-IN 1991 Tamil Nadu Agricultural Development 20.00 - 20.00 2223-IN 1991 Technician Education 1I - 307.10 274.68 2300-IN 1992 Child Survival and Safe Motherhood - 214.50 191.63 2394-IN 1992 Family Welfare (Urban Slums) * - 79.00 79.33 2328-IN 1992 Maharashtra Forestry - 124.00 116.35 2350-IN 1992 National AIDS Control - 84.00 77.27 3436-IN 1992 Power Utilities Efficiency 265.00 - 250.98 3498-IN 1992 Second saharashtra Power * 3SO.00 - 350.00 3470-IN 1992 Second National Highway 153.00 - 153.00 2365-IN 1992 Second National Highway - 153.00 149.34 2329-IN 1992 Shrimp ard Fish Culture - 85.00 82.S9 2341-IN 1992 West Ber;a1 Forestry - 34.00 31.65  -12- SCHEDULE 0 PAGE 3 of 6 USS Million (net of cancellations) Loan or Fiscal Year --------- Credit No.of Appr Purpose IBRD IDA I/ Undisbursed 2/