Madagascar - Plain of Antananarivo Technical Assistance Project

Document of The World Bank FOR OMCIAL USE ONLY Report No. 11458 PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT MADAGASCAR STUDY OF THE PLAIN OF ANTANANARIVO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (CREDIT 1086-MAG) DECEMBER 22, 1992 Agriculture Operations Division South-Central and Indian Ocean Department Africa Regional Office This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.  EXCHANGE RATES Currency Unit: Malagasy Francs (FMG) US$1.00 Year Equivalent 1978 225.7 1979 212.7 1980 211.3 1981 271.7 1982 349.7 1983 430.4 1984 576.6 1985 662.5 1986 676.3 1987 1,069.2 ABBREVIATIONS CCCE Caisse Centrale pour la Coopdration Economique (French Aid Agency) EEDR Mamokatra/EuroConsult Malagasy-Dutch Engineering Consortium EEGC DINIKA/SCET International Malagasy-French Engineering Consortium FMG Malagasy Franc IDA International Development Association PCR Project Completion Report TCP Technically Coherent Plans Fiscal Year of Government January 1 - December 31  FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY THE WORLD BANK Washington, D.C. 20433 U.S.A. Office of Director-General Operations Evaluation December 22, 1992 MEMORANDUM TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS AND THE PRESIDENT SUBJECT: Project Completion Report on Madagascar - Study of the Plain of Antananarivo Technical Assistance Project (Credit 1086-MAGj Attached is a copy of the report entitled "Project Completion Report on Madagascar Study of the Plain of Antananarivo Technical Assistance Project (Credit 1086-MAG)" prepared by the Africa Regional Office. No comments on Parts I and m were received from the Borrower. This technical assistance project with limited objectives provided resources to complete an integrated plan for flood control and development in the Plain of Antananarivo. The master plan was used as the basis for preparing the Antananarivo Plain Development Project (Credit 2117-MAG) and was instrumental in obtaining assistance from donors for other projects on the Plain. As such, the project is rated as satisfactory. The Project Completion Report (PCR) is informative and satisfactory. However, the PCR notes that two supervision reports are missing from the project files resulting in permanent loss of institutional memory of this project. An audit is recommended jointly with two other investment projects in the agricultural sector and an agricultural sector adjustment operation (ASAC) since this would provide an opportunity to evaluate a number of sectorwide issues and some aspects of the Bank's role in the agricultural sector in Madagascar. Attachment This document has a restricted distrlbution and may be used by reciplents only In the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorlzatlon.   FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT MADAGASCAR STUDY OF THE PLAIN OF ANTANANARIVO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 1086-MAG) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ......................................................... i EVALUATION SUMMARY ........................................... iii PART I: PROJECT REVIEW FROM THE BANK'S PERSPECTIVE .... ....... 1 Project Identity . ............................................... 1 Project Background ............................................. 1 Project Objectives and Description .................................. 1 Project Design and Organization ................................... 2 Project Implementation .......................................... 3 Results ....................................................... 5 Sustainability . ................................................. 5 Bank Performance ............. ................................. 5 Borrower Performance ........................................... 5 Consultants Performance ......................................... 5 Project Documentation .......................................... 6 PART II: PROJECT REVIEW FROM THE BORROWER'S PERSPECTIVE ..... 7 PART III: STATISTICAL INFORMATION ................................ 8 Table 1: Related Bank Projects .................................... 8 Table 2: Project Timetable ........... ............................ 9 Table 3: Project Costs and Financing ............................... 10 Table 4: Credit Disbursements ................................... 11 Table 5: Project Implementation .................................. 12 Table 6: Status of Covenants ..................................... 13 Table 7: Use of Bank Resources .................................. 14 Map: IBRD 14964R This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization.   i PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT MADAGASCAR STUDY OF THE PLAIN OF ANTANANARIVO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 1086-MAG) PREFACE This is the Project Completion Report (PCR) for the Technical Assistance Project for the Study of the Plain of Antananarivo in Madagascar, for which Cr. 1086-MAG in the amount of US$2.32 million (SDR 1.8 million equivalent) was approved on December 18, 1980. The credit became effective on October 16, 1981, a delay of seven months. The Credit was closed on December 31, 1986, a delay of three years. The credit was fully disbursed and the last disbursement took place on August 25, 1987. 1/ The report (Preface, Evaluation Summary, and Parts I and III) was prepared by the Agriculture Operations Division of the South-Central and Indian Ocean Department of the Africa Regional Office and is based, inter alia, on the President's Report, Credit Agreement, supervision reports, correspondence between the Bank and the Borrower, and Internal Bank memoranda. The PCR was sent to Government with a request to prepare Part II. No comments were received. 1/ The delay in producing this report was the result of an earlier decision to combine this report with the project completion report for the follow-on project. (Antananarivo Plain Development Project, Cr. 2117-MAG.) This decision was reversed in order to avoid further delays.   iii PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT MADAGASCAR STUDY OF THE PLAIN OF ANTANANARIVO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 1086-MAG) EVALUATION SUMMARY Background 1. The Plain of Antananarivo, located close to the capital city of the same name, used to be a predominantly agricultural area, but has now become a partly residential area due to the expansion of the city. It is subject to serious, periodic flooding. Major floods occurred in 1954, 1959 and 1977. In 1959, twenty percent of the dwellings in the area were flooded and the Plain was under two meters of water, parts of it for several months. The 1977 flood, caused major damage to the dikes because of their generally poor state of maintenance. About 16,000 persons were affected, large areas of the capitol city were flooded and an important part of the rice crop was lost. Also, when flooding occurs, serious outbreaks of malaria follow. 2. The Government had, at the time of project preparation in 1979-80, no coherent plan for the protection of residential and agricultural areas of the Plain against floods. The proposed project was to fill this gap and assist the Government in defining an integrated flood control and development program for the area. Objectives 3. The objective of the project was to prepare an integrated plan for flood control and development in the Plain of Antananarivo. Specifically, (a) technically coherent and financially feasible pre-investment studies were to be conducted at a pre-feasibility stage for flood control and expansion of economic activities; (b) the network of research stations for erosion and soil protection, hydrological measurements and flood alerts, was to be improved; and (c) the capability of the Directorate General of Planning was to be strengthened to supervise the project. Implementation Experience 4. The consultant selection process to carry out the study was lengthy and caused a 9 month delay in project start-up. Aerial photographs could not be taken during the dry season in September-October 1981 as scheduled and had to be postponed to June 1982; in addition, the company that held the monopoly on aerial photography, Air Madagascar, did not provide the quality and quantity of photos required. The initial contract with the consultants was therefore extended from 21 to 30 months. 5. After the initial slow start-up phase, progress was good. Project execution was smooth without any major problems. The first stage of review was completed in February 1983.  iv During the second and third phase, the consultants reviewed in more detail the technical implications of six of the selected scenarios and their financial and economic impact. In the final phase, a selection was made on the scenario with the lowest cost-benefit ratio. By December 1984, the master plan had been completed. In the process, three promising ideas and engineering designs emerged and it was decided to use the remaining funds to prepare feasibility studies on these. Consequently, the closing date was extended to December 1986. Results 6. This was a successful Technical Assistance project. The final masterplan for the rehabilitation and long-term development was revised to minimize investment needs and maximize economic benefits, to improve the flood-warning system for the lower town of Antananarivo, and for institutional coordination of major structures in the plain. The masterplan was used as the basis for the Antananarivo Plain Development Project (Cr. 2117- MAG), which was approved on March 29, 1990. It also led to significant donor support for other projects on the Plain. Sustainability 7. Project results were sustainable in the sense that the studies led to several IDA and donor financed interventions. Findings and Lessons Learned 8. The major findings and lessons learned are: - It is important to keep a project such as this one simple and focussed. When considerable uncertainty exists on available options, the design phase of a large project should be separated from the implementation phase in order to avoid lengthy delays.  PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT MADAGASCAR STUDY OF THE PLAIN OF ANTANANARIVO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 1086-MAG) PART I: PROJECT REVIEW FROM THE BANK'S PERSPECTIVE 1. Project Identity Project Name: Study of the Plain of Antananarivo Technical Assistance Project Credit No.: 1086-MAG RVP Unit: Africa Regional Office Department: South-Central and Indian Ocean Department Sector: Agriculture, Infrastructure Sub-Sector: Technical Assistance 2. Project Background 2.1 The Plain of Antananarivo occupies a central position in Madagascar. The city of Antananarivo and neighboring villages were originally built on hills located on the edge of the Plain, but with urban growth, low-lying areas have been increasingly developed, most of the time with low-standard dwellings lacking modern infrastructure. Most of the Plain is subject to frequent flooding. Very early in Malagasy history it benefitted from reclamation of marshes, construction of dikes and of drainage and irrigation canals. Production in flat areas is irrigated. Paddy is the most important crop. 2.2 Major floods occurred in the Plain in 1954, 1959 and 1977. In 1959, twenty percent of the dwellings in the area were flooded and the Plain was under two meters of water, parts of it for several months. The 1977 flood, caused major damage to the dikes because of their generally poor state of maintenance. About 16,000 persons were affected, large areas of the city were flooded and an important part of the rice crop was lost. 2.3 The Government had, at the time of project preparation (1979-80) no coherent multi- sectoral plan for the protection of the city and the Plain against floods. The proposed project was to fill this gap and assist the Government in defining an integrated flood control and development program for the area. 3. Project Obiectives and Description 3.1 The objective of the project was to support the Government's efforts to prepare an integrated flood control and development program for the Plain of Antananarivo. Specifically, the project had the following components:  (i) pre-investment studies to be conducted at the pre-feasibility stage to define a technically coherent, economically justified and financially feasible investment program. The studies were to include: (a) Review and critical analysis of existing documentation and experience with available technical options to protect the Plain against floods and improve drainage; and with agronomic packages to intensify agriculture in the region; (b) Definition of possible flood control and development schemes, taking into account their implications for the future growth pattern of the Antananarivo urban area; (c) Assessment of costs and benefits of possible schemes, with an analysis of their economic consequences in all sectors involved; and finally (d) Definition of not more than five feasible programs and a proposal for a choice among them; these programs would also define self-contained steps for phased implementation. (ii) Improve the network of research stations for erosion and soil protection on the upper catchment areas of the Plain, and improve the hydrological measurement and flood alert network in the Plain; and (iii) Strengthen the capability of the Directorate General of Planning of the Ministry of Finance and Planning to supervise the program of studies for the Plain. 4. Project Design and Oreanization 4.1 The project had a relatively simple design. It was set up to carry out a number of pre- feasibility studies in preparation for one or more larger scale investment projects. The project consisted of four basic phases: I. Collection of existing data and proposition of a limited number of technically coherent plans (TCP). II. Detailed work on the technical implications of the TCPs. III. Financial and economic analysis of the costs and benefits of the TCPs. IV. Comparison of the TCPs. 4.2 The involvement of the General Directorate of Planning of the Ministry of Finance and Planning was expected to contribute to strengthening the coordination, supervision and decision- making capabilities within that ministry. 4.3 Three types of risks had been identified: (i) the complexity of the technical and socio- economic problems involved; (ii) the intricacy of the coordination and decision making process; and (iii) the uncertainty over the feasibility of a flood control scheme.  -3 - 5. Proiect Implementation Project Effectiveness 5.1 The project was approved on December 18, 1980, and became effective on October 16, 1981, a delay of about seven months. This delay was caused by bureaucratic tardiness in obtaining the Government's legal opinion. Disbursements 5.2 Disbursements were slow for the following reasons: (a) project execution was initially held up due to late credit effectiveness; (b) late availability of the aerial photographs and problems with the mathematical model of Plain hydrology; and (c) project activities were redesigned to include preparation of detailed design and tender documents for irrigation rehabilitation and flood protection. As a result, the closing date of the credit was extended twice to December 31, 1985. A third extension to December 31, 1986, was granted to permit financing of the studies for the Drainage/Flood Control Project (never implemented), which were completed in September 1986. Studies 5.3 The contract for conducting the pre-investment studies was given to a Malagasy-French engineering consortium EEGC DINIKA/SCET International; the award of the contract was held up for some months by disagreement within the Commission Centrale de Marches and was ultimately signed in October 1981 by the Minister of Finance without the Commission having reached agreement. The contract was signed in November 1981. Due to the late award of the contract, a dry season for aerial photography was lost. The contract for the supervision of the study was awarded in February 1982 to the Malagasy-Dutch consortium EEDR Mamokatra/EuroConsult for the sum of FMG 36,662,460 (about US$100,000). 5.4 A severe cyclone, which occurs on average only once every seven years, struck at the beginning of 1982. This provided a unique opportunity for the compilation of data on flood damage caused by the Ikopa River overrunning its banks. Delays were incurred, however, when the consulting firm was obliged to use Air Madagascar for aerial photography. Photos were of mediocre quality and only part of the project area had been photographed. As a result, the contract period had to be extended from 21 to 30 months and the contract price increased from FMG 439,200,000 (about US$1.2 million) to FMG 484,000,000. Topographical and geological surveys were carried out and high water levels were measured. Phase I was completed by the end of February 1983. Even though the aerial photography had still not been completed, two reports were produced: (i) outlining the data underlying all TCPs; and (ii) an outline of the TCPs. Four conclusions could be drawn at the end of Phase I. First, Government and donors had a limited capacity to fund a project. Second, the Phase II studies would need to be project oriented. Third, the limited capacity of local institutions to support Phase II activities, and fourth, the limited role of agriculture in likely project orientations. 5.5 Phase II and Phase III studies were implemented with some delays (Table 5, Part III). The delays were the result of the late availability of the aerial photographs and problems with the mathematical model of the Plain's hydrology. Cost estimates for the six selected scenarios ranged from FMG 19-26 billion (about US$ 32-45 million). The two least cost solutions were selected  for further evaluation. Z/ The Plain was divided in seven hydrologically homogeneous units. For each of these units, three rehabilitation and/or improvement scenarios were considered: (i) raising dike levels; (ii) construction of a reservoir dam; and (iii) raising dike levels and construction of a drainage system separate from irrigation canals). The final results showed that raising dike levels of the right bank of the Ikopa river (Laniera irrigation scheme) to the ten year flood level was the most cost-effective approach. The protection of Antananarivo's lower town had by this time been separated from the general flood control problem of the Plain. The construction of a reservoir dam was not judged feasible because of siltation problems. 5.6 By December 1984, the project, as originally designed, was winding to a close with its primary objective achieved; i.e., a master plan for the protection of the Plain had been prepared. In the process, three promising project ideas emerged which represented the first stages of the master plan implementation. It was decided to use the remaining funds on the feasibility of these studies. This was the justification for the extension of the closing date. The three engineering designs prepared were: (i) the flood protection works for the lower town of Antananarivo; (ii) the rehabilitation of the Laniera irrigation scheme; and (iii) improvement of the downstream drainage of the Plain. 5.7 Supervision of the feasibility studies for flood protection of the lower town of Antananarivo was transferred to the East Africa Projects Water and Urban Department as part of the preparation of the Sanitation and Flood Control Project of the City of Antananarivo, which later became the Antananarivo Plain Development Project (Cr. 2117-MAG). 5.8 The Laniera Perimeter was, after additional studies, excluded from the Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (Cr. 1337-MAG), because investment requirements were too large and the area did not fit the selection criteria. The French Caisse Centrale pour la Cooperation Economique (CCCE) provided financing for this irrigation scheme under a separate arrangement. The improved drainage of the Plain through additional pumps or a gravity style design was judged not to be economically feasible. 5.9 A special study had been made of soil erosion problems in the catchment areas of the Ikopa and Sisaony rivers based on six experimental sites in the Ikopa catchment area and aerial photography. It was found that the Sisaony catchment area was very much degraded and in need of reafforestation. Possible solutions would be sought under the Forestry Management and Protection Project (Cr. 1878-MAG), which was under preparation at the time. Research Stations 5.10 Decisions on the types of equipment needed to improve the network of research stations for erosion and soil protection on the upper catchment areas of the Plain could not be taken. It was unclear what equipment would serve future needs best, given the range of technical solutions to the flooding problem. It was therefore decided to include the procurement of this equipment in a potential follow-on project. 21 A later supervision mission estimated the lowest cost scenarios at US$ 40 million. No reason for the discrepancy could be found in files.  - 5 - Strengthening the Directorate General of Planning of the Ministry of Finance and Planning 5.11 The project was to fund local consultants to assist the Directorate General in supervising the studies and to provide transportation. The Malagasy-Dutch engineering consortium, EEDR Mamokatra/EuroConsult was hired for this purpose (para. 5.3) and a vehicle was procured for the project coordinator within the Directorate General. No implementation issues arose. 6. Results 6.1 This was a successful Technical Assistance project. A masterplan for the rehabilitation and long-term development of the Plain was completed and designed to minimize investment needs and maximize economic benefits, to improve the flood-warning system for the lower town of Antananarivo, and to provide for institutional coordination of major structures in the plain. The masterplan was ultimately used as the basis for preparing the Antananarivo Plain Development Project (Cr. 2117-MAG). It also led to significant donor support for other projects on the Plain. 7. Sustainability 7.1 Project results were sustainable in the sense that the studies led to several IDA and donor financed interventions. 8. Bank Performance 8.1 Bank supervision missions were frequent. They were mostly combined with other supervision missions in Madagascar to save resources. Staff involved adhered to project objectives and were able to convince Government of the need to limit design options and minimize investment costs. 9. Borrower Performance 9.1 Government's response was slow in the recruitment of consultants. Government submitted a list of nine pre-selected firms, and although the Bank proposed to reduce the list to five or six, Government maintained its decision to invite proposals from the nine firms. In April 1981, Government notified the Bank of its intention to award the contract to EEGC DINIKA/SCET International. Although Government was notified of Bank's non-objection in May 1981, the contract was not submitted for another six months in spite of repeated requests by Bank missions. The contract was finally awarded to consultants on November 12, 1981. This delayed start-up of the project. 10. Consultants Performance 10.1 Both consulting consortiums performed satisfactorily. The technical quality of the studies was in line with expectations and the same two consulting consortiums were maintained during project implementation.  - 6 - 11. Project Documentation 11.1 Project files were incomplete, with two supervision reports missing. Due to the long delay in producing this PCR, much of the institutional memory was lost.  - 7 - PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT MADAGASCAR STUDY OF THE PLAIN OF ANTANANARIVO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 1086-MAG) PART II: PROJECT REVIEW FROM THE BORROWER'S PERSPECTIVE No comments were received.  - 8 - PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT MADAGASCAR STUDY OF THE PLAIN OF ANTANANARIVO TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (CREDIT 1086-MAG) PART III: STATISTICAL INFORMATION Table 1: Related Bank Projects Project Name Credit Year of Amount of Status Approval Loan/Credit (Millions of SDR) Morondava Irrigation and Rural Cr. 322-MAG 1972 15.30 Closed on Development December 31, 1981 Second Village Livestock and Cr. 506-MAG 1974 9.60 Closed on Rural Development December 31, 1982 Mangoro Forestry Cr. 525-MAG 1974 6.75 Closed on I__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _December 31, 1980 Mangoky Agricultural Cr. 881-MAG 1979 12.00 Closed on Development August 31, 1986  - 9 - Table 2: Project Timetable Date Date Date Planned Revised Actual Identification 1977 - 1977 Preparation _ _- 77/80 Appraisal - 02/80 Negotiations 10/80 - 10/06/80 Board Presentation 12/80 12/18/80 Credit Signature - 01/30/81 Credit Effectiveness 03/81 - 10/16/81 Credit Closing 12/31/83 12/85 12/31/86 Last Disbursement 06/30/84 08/25/87  - 10- Table 3: Project Costs and Financing A. Estimated versus Actual Project Costs (USS '000) Appraisal Estimate Actual Actual as % of Estimate Studies 2,780 2,628 95 Research Stations 85 0 0 Strengthening the Directorate 35 12 34 General of Planning (Ministry of Finance) Total Project Cost 2,900 2,640 91 B. Estimated versus Actual Project Financing (US$ '000) Appraisal Estimate Actual Actual as % of Estimate IDA Credit 2,300 2,040 88 Government 600 600 3/ 100 Total Project Financing 2,900 2,640 91 3/ PCR estimate.  - 11 - Table 4: Credit Disbursements A. Cumulative Estimated and Actual Disbursements 3/ (US$ thousand) Year FY8 1 FY82 FY83 FY84 FY85 FY86 FY87 FY88 Appraial Estimate 300 1,700 2,300 Actual 0 0 S0 400 830 1,000 1,540 2,040 Actual as % of Estimate O 0 3.5 17 .4 36. 1 43.5 67.0 88.7 Date of final disbursement: August 25, 1987. B. Disbursements by Category (in '000 SDRs) Category Estimated at Actual Appraisal Studies 1,360 1,789 Scientific Equipment 50 0 Vehicles for Directorate 25 11 General of Planning Unallocated 365 - TOTAL 1,800 1,800 I/ Discrepancies in US$ amounts are the results of exchange rate fluctuations.  - 12 - Table 5: Project Implementation Phase Estimated Date of Revised Actual Date of Completion November 1982 Completion 1. Collection of existing data and proposition March 1982 February 1983 February 1983 of a limited number of TCPs I. Detailed work on technical implications of September 1982 July 1983 December 1983 the TCPs III. Financial and economic cost-benefit May 1983 March 1984 June 1984 analysis of the TCPS IV. Comparison of the TCPs August 1983 June 1984 November 1984  - 13 - Table 6: Status of Covenants Section Object Status 3.01 (a) The Borrower shall carry out the Project through the General Directorate Complied with. with due diligence and efficiency. (b) The Borrower shall maintain the Technical Committee. 3.02 (a) In order to assist the Borrower: (i) in carrying out the studies included in Complied with. Part A of the Project; and (ii) in supervising said studies and in preparing the quarterly progress reports mentioned in Section 3.06 (b) of this Agreement, the Borrower shall employ engineering, management and financial consultants whose qualifications, experience and terms and conditions of employment shall be satisfactory to the Association. (b) The Borrower shall take all reasonable measures to facilitate the work of the consultants. 3.03 The Borrower shall furnish to the Association for its review and comments Complied with delays. interim reports for the studies. 3.04 The Borrower shall select, in consultation with the Association, not more Complied with. than five coherent technical schemes for the economic analysis to be included in the studies to be carried out under Part A of the Project. 3.05 (a) The Borrower undertakes to insure, or make adequate provision for the Complied with. insurance of, the imported goods to be financed out of the proceeds of the Credit. (b) Except as the Association shall otherwise agree, the Borrower shall cause all goods and services financed out of the proceeds of the Credit to be used exclusively for the Project. 3.06 (a) The Borrower: (i) shall maintain rocords and procedures adequate to record Complied with. and monitor the progres of the Project; (ii) shall enable the Association's accredited representatives to visit the facilities and work sites included in the Project; and (iii) shall furnish to the Association at regular intervals all such information as the Association shall reasonably request concerning the Project. (b) For the purpose of monitoring the progress of the Project, the Borrower Complied with delays. shall furnish to the Association quarterly progress reports. (c) Prompdy after completion of the Project, but in any event not later than six Not complied with. months after the Closing Date or such later date " may be agreed for this purpose between the Borrower and the Association, the Borrower shall prepare and furnish to the Association a project completion report. 4.02 The Bofrower shall maintain or cause to be maintained records adequate to Complied with. reflect in accordance with consistently maintained appropriate accounting practices, the operations, resources and expenditures, in respect of the Project, of the departments or agencies of the Borrower responsible for the carrying out of the Project or any part thereof. 4.02 The Borrower shall furnish to the Association such information concerning Complied with delays. said records as the Association shall from time to time reasonably request.  - 14 - Table 7: Use of Bank Resources A. Staff Inputs (staff weeks) 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1992 TOTAL Preappraisal 1.9 9.6 11.5 Appraisal 10.6 10.6 Negotiations 0.9 2.7 _ 3.6 Supervision 0.6 5.9 4.3 5.9 12.7 0.6 30.0 Others - 7.4 6.9 1.4 = = 0.3 - = 0.9 16.9 TotaL 1.9 28.5 9.6 2.0 5.9 4.3 6.2 12.7 0.6 0.9 72.6 B. Mission Data No. of Days in Specializations Performance Rating Type of Month/Year Persons Field Represented Status Trends Problems Preparation 1 11/78 2 10 e, w Preparation 2 06/79 1 4 e Preparation 3 09/79 1 8 w AppraisaL 1 02/80 4 11 e, w, r Supervision 1 04/82 2 21 a, f 1 1 Supervision 2 11/82 3 14 f, W, s 2 2 T Supervision 3 02/83 3 10 f, a, d 2 1 T Supervision 4 EJ 11/83 2 10 a, i Supervision 5 11/84 2 26 a, e 1 1 T Supervision 6 02/85 3 14 a, e, i 1 1 Supervision 7 11/85 4 5 a, i, i 1 1 Supervision 8 03/86 4 10 a, e, i, f 1 1 Supervision 9 07/86 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Key: Specializations: a=agriculturist; d=drainage/flood cont. spec.; e=economist; f=financial analyst; i=irrigation engineer; r=forester; s=sociologist; w=water resources specialist. Status: 1=No problems; 2=Moderate problems; 3=Serious problems. Trend: 1=Improving; 2=Satisfactory; 3=Worsening. Type of problems: T=Technical. 5J Back to Office Report only. Note: Most of the supervision missions had multiple tasks.  MAP SECTION  I  _IBRD 14964R 47' 15' 47-30' 47-45' hin (nK MADAGASCAR 0 Plain of Antananorivo TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT M@k@401i0 CATCHMENT AREAS 1 18'30' Controlled by Existing Dams AN 30NANARIVOAANAinV ' ;3) 1 IKOPA a* MAMBA 0 AAoMod, SISAONY I Z ANDROMBA o f/ - Limit of IKOPA Basin 0Tofir C c -z Roads rC_ v _Rivers j oANKiAZONVDADY 18'451- \ 18-45' AndakOma I- OlPOm 19 00~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~90' -191005 1 _1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~0 ThG,hop. The pe ntinwd F or W.C@Po,-!O KILOMETRS ? 10 20 30 40 50 .o #hi. -p do Wo imply, o- lie ____________________________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~p.,t of TO. Wodfd BooI, G -op. MILES ' b2bi :OnY-1 go; fnieli0 o,e e 47 ;15' 4 7 -30' 47 45' 48-00 ' O T B 1