World Bank Group · Working Paper

India - Gujarat Rural Roads Project (Credit 1757-IN), World Bank supervision mission (August 28 - August 31, 1989) : aide memoire

India World Bank
View original document

The full text is hosted by the publishing organisation. lawenc.com indexes the metadata and links to the official source.

Full text

 73078 [NDlA CFia)IT 1957IN -- ()J.:U2JRAT F\'l..F(f.:'L F;.'(}0J)S PF;.{)JECT ~ BAN< SLPER'v'ISICN MISSli]\! AU)JST :;;':'8 - PLEUST ::H ~ 1989 AIlE I"El"DIFE 1.1 A VJorld &.1nk mission conprising C.S. Nawathe (Highway Engineer) fran t.he J\lE.w Delhi office visi ted GLdar~'i\t fran Auqust ~:B thrO"lgh A..lgust 31 t.o SLlpervi~:;;e this project.. RIa to he""vy rains t!-'II'"'OLlgrlout G_l.iarat preceeding and during the period, missions visit to the project sites had to be cancelled • .1.2 This Aide Me.'ffiOire SLurmarizes t.he mission's findings and discussions "'lith Governnent o·f GI_tialr'at (E03) officials. Tt'lE' conclusions and recO'llITlE?I',dations n::!(::or·dec;1 he1r'e, alre ~:.ubject to confinnation by the Bank. 1.3 ThE~ mission wist1€~:; to reconi i bs appreciation of the assistance received ·frc.m ,,':\11 COnCet'Tled in t:(E, and in parti,cLllar cn ::::Oth A..lgust, the day of 'Bharat Band'. A lis1: (;)f ofHcials met is enclosed as appendiN L App:?ndi>: 2 shows the project status for the period ending JLlly 1989. In brief, c)f theo .1025 jobs totalling 4042 kilometers~ work is in progress on 400 jc)bs t.otallin~:j at:o.lt 1400 kms. \.IJork is canpleteci in some 152 kms. The cost of l-..clr"ks in progr-ess is appF'C,)X Rs. 425 million or 25 per-cent of theo esti.mated cos1: of Rs. 1725 million for all thE' jobs. E}(pendi ture on civil works to the end of July 1989 is Rs. 103.9 M or 61. of the estimated cost. DLlt-ing the period reimt:I!_lrsetlit."!I1t obtained is 7.4 M:::3DF~ or' -r;. of the credit amOLUlt and 90~1. of t.he r-evised targets. 3.1 001 hc.~s giver"! A.A to 237 jobs totalling 12::¥:) kms after a delay of 10-.12 m:::nths. Jobs; which should have been started at tt'lE' beginning of FR89-90 arE? Uus delayed. U",less TectTl.i.cal Sc:\fictiorls (TS) elr'e received~ procurement actic.ns can't be finalist::."'CI. In fact, ideally all the jobs sra.tId t-eceive TS and PI) sil'l1..ll tanea.lsJ. y, so th.:ilt by the tirnE~ t.hey get inc luded in tre new b..ldget, pn:cun?m::::nt actions a,we also almost finalised; and t!''lE' neIN wol'''ks can be taken up 'for e>:ecl.ltic.n at the beginning of the financj,c:~l year. Lhfortunatel y due to inor-dinate deliW in !;)iving AA, the wor-ks pn)(;}ram has lagged behind almost by one ye"iIf" ~. Even all thc-? works budget ted in the last two years (i.e. FY 87-88 and 88-8'7) rtave not t)£:?er1 given TS. Th..IS only 517 jobs to'talling 1859 kms with an f.:-'Stilllat€,,,d cost of Rs. ::.'8'"71 mi 11 icrl have received TS, through 565 totalling 2.1:.;;::'::; kms and e!,~tilT1ated to cost Rs. 7::::,0 million !H:i\ve l::een included in the budget 1TlI'_1re than 18 mcnths back. (:03 is r'E:qUE:.-.stE:."d to take nece=.sary steps so that the si 1:ua'tion can be rectified wi th:Jt..lt fUrtl"lE?r- lrnss (Tf time. 2 4.:\. Al tho..lgh c:c)nb~ac:tors VJE're prequal i f ied in October 19l=l8, pnxurenent actions have not been conpleted for 114 jobs out of 299 jobs included in tl"E 138/89 budqE!t. Of bids will be I~eceived srrJr-tly (September 15, 18 and Oct.ober 10) for 8(1 Considering that a::E has dropped 26 jobs because of their complet.ic:n by tl"le lCJI::al authorit.i.e5~ ff.'V3 has to take prompt actic:ns in finalising r.::w-ocl.lr"E!ll)£,.7n\:s 'fol" :::4 jobs I::x..ldgettf£d in F-"Y89-90 Clnd the 2:5'1 jobd Y"eCf£11tl y givE~n A.A. 4.2 Missic:n ccrlducted field review of sane of the contt"'acts accepted by GCH. A list of cCY1tr.ac·t.:s revi~ is enclosed ;as appendi)·::3. From Ule rf?\liew of pn:x::ureoent decisic:ns in t.he field, following shortconi.ngs, viloations of the Bank guidelinec.s were bra.lght to the notice of the 2:'!utht'Jri tiE-s. c:n several occasic:ns GCX3 has rejected the bids withoLlt prior apprc)val crf the bc:{I1k (packages 1-F'3' t-P 5' /;P3' Fi'F'9 etc.); delays of more than 90 days;. in acceptance of the bids riC\'VE.> not be."B1 br"a.lght to the notice of tile b...."1J..lk (Package /;'810 ); the ac:ceptance of the' bidi:.; is not cc:m..\f1ic:ated to the bank with full details, check list, conparative st2'ltemb"'llts etc. wi thin 10 days of of the bids (all p.:::\ckagec.s) ~ SC'...,calaticln clause has been retained inspite of the fact that conpletion pt.~riod is less than 12 months; bidf~ have been accepted in fava.lr (,.Jf contr"actors without apparently var-i fying whether' Ule cCY1tractor-s capacity (determined at the time o'f pn::.qual i f icatic.'lr1) has f:::':Ce:eded or not (Package JP.15); contr'actS', have be:."'E'II aWi:\r-ded to the cc:ntr'actor-s who<=-,..,e progr-e5s c:n the ear"lier- jobs an::,:. far- 'fr-om satisfactory (package JP15); wclr-kl:.; have t'.'IE.'er"l aw.:,,~led wi tr'lClut any f ir-m recCliTillef1dations fron the E)·;-Engineer- or 8."tl:lerintending F'.ngineer concerned; and the conparati Yf..? stat.eolefits lack aut.hr-:ntici ty as corr-ectic:ns ar-e not. ath~tf..!(j arid occassic:nally ay"e n01: signed by tt'E concen,ed officials. 5. ~'. J G03 r'iC'ils proposed amendffiE':'llts in clauses 7 and 46 of the c..=ieneral cOlfdit.ions of the ccrltr-act. Al tha.lgh tllese were, in pl~inciple, agret~ to by the ear'lier missia1; tt'E dr-aft amendi'l'leflts were not SE':'IIt to tt'E barl~:: for- appr-oval. The pr-oposed '!;-j(.:hedule D giving time schedule l~or conpleticrl of different designated of WOI~~:; and r"at.e c)f liquidity damages pr-oposed need to be modi fied on basis Qf the sample clause and e}:planaticns given c:n pagf?s f:j.) & 61 of the SBD for Pt"'C:lCLlr"ement of WClr-ks (September 1985 editiCYi). DI~aft of the pr"oposed revisic:n may be SE':'IIt t.o the t:x.."1J1k for" approval. 5.2 ?'nother- imp::Jrtant change rEquir'ecj is deleticn of tlJe. following er',dorSEffiE'nt pY"inted at the bot.tom of sctledule B of the bidding documEnt n.::~mel y "I1VJe/am/an;>/wil1ing to carry CJLlt. tile? I,F,IOd:: •••••••• ~1. in words •• g pe>t-cent ••••• below the tendered ri:\te mentioned atove. (The word NIL. shall be filled in)." We feel t.hat this endorsement defeats the prupose clf t.re item rclt.e cc:.ntt-act and !;JivE.s scope to the bidders to manip..tlate Heir bids.; at t.he tim!? of !::>lJbmission of t.1lE?:i.r tenders. Bidders an:? t.h..IS tempted 1'.:0 wait ti 11 the last minut.e au,d to Irah fy their bids considerimJ the t.ype of cc.'(Jlpe.>ti t:i.on they WClLlld bE:: facing. t:.... l For- t,hE~ m:!W works (237 jobs, 1240 kms, estimat~:I C:CJst Rs. 415 million) which have be?E;:,n given f:'lC/ministrativ£"-;, Approval on 10.8.8'1, G03 has plc\T1ned t.o pn:,,"qui:\lii:y contract.on;:, following the? scr~"dule given below: I sSlJe {~jvertiSf.i!mE!rlt. 8 August '89 Sale of FH dOCufllents from 21 to :51 Pugust < 89 Receipt of docurnent.s ::::~) September '89 Finalise F'Q ::.'\() Q:tober '89 7.1 Al thc..~IC]h as many as 3~'i & 76 contractm-s wen? prEquali f ied fOI~ the v.od:: progrc\ins started in 87/00 and 00/89 reslJE'Ct"ively, only half of the preqL\~"IlifiE.'CI cont.ract.ors have got. the 110 p.::~ckagE::~~ fm- which bids riCwe beer, accept.ed <';-:;0 fat-. Ever, tht1Ltgh mt,t;t of the contractor's haVf? be.'E.'fl given tr,orks ITLlch belDw their car:.l2\ci ty, the.' clveral J. progn:?ss is very p:x:.r. No action has been t,akc'f1 i')g.;,inst any of trl€:! con trac:tor"s, eitt'er" for slow pn:.gl~ess or for not completing tJlE'! IrJf..3F·b?; wi thin tre sti p..tlated c:c.~npletion peric:ds. It \I\ICX..tld be intet-estinq to stt.lc:ly trJ(~ I~rfonnance of HE Visnagar Taluka Mandali, and the l?!l.ljar·at St.ate COf')stnlctic:n D:.1rPOI~ation I-'Jho were fir"st and sec:orld in respe.>et of the fini':<'l'1cial ci:\pac:ities LIPt.O which they \rO..lld be given v.orks. Their pe.>rformance statem!i?nt is giVEn .:at Appendh: 4. The mission recofflmerlds that it is nec;essary t<::J mcni tor the progress of l?ach contractor at higher levels to enSLlt-e that actions co...tld tlE' takEn promptly to rectify the situat.ion. 8.l f~l theugh t.he importa.nee of taking advance act.ions to ac:quiY"e l.:.mds be'fore acceptance of bids 1:('JI~ the civil tr.Drks has beer, stressed again and again by tt1f? previous missicns, and al thc..~lgh at th€~ tinl€.~ of ne<;:)O'tiations t.he bank was in'fonned that land acquisation is i:.'\ pn:n~quisi t.e t.o granting of Admini.strative Approval, the c\ct.ual sitUi::ltic:<n is VE:~ry ml..lch diffE'I"E·nt. As many as 473 jobs (C:JUt of 516 jobs when:? wQt-k is stc:u'-ted) an;> .:.{ffe!:tet1 due to nen availability crt land. None of the", :.~; Spf:?CiC':d, Land PK::qu:i.sc:'\tion units have startE.>d fllnctioning PI~Oj:i8rly. [ne crt the LU'1i t nEi-ec.is:; to be:? s;hi fte-d from Vadcdar"a to be I'"eall y useful for the pr"ojE~t. TI-'j12 miE,sion fE-els that. R8..B depart:mE.rlt must tahe measures similar to tt'X)S€.~ t':''1ken 'ft'Jr A:quisation crf land for" the Atms:dabad Vadodara and set. up high level in ter"depc,rtrnent,C\1 COIl'iT,i ttee to mc:.rd tor progress on land acquisatic::n few" the project roads. 4 Al thc:ugh jeeps and cars have been provided to many EEs and rEs sane rEs have to depe1'1d upon Vans for treir iTlOvements. Also demand of tl-e field staff for good dependable inspection vehiclE'-"'":; has not been fully met. Many of the Junior Erfgineers have applie:-d for adV&1Ces few" purchc.se of motor cycles. As the road iAlClrks are E.cat.ten.. -:d and located in the interior inaccessible places, ava.ilabiHty of theSf.:? tVK.'.> wheE>ler"s will greatly enhance effect.iveness o'f the sl.lpery~s,u:ln. ThE~ missia1 rec:OIrmends that GCIG take pranpt stf..?p5 to qrant SLlch adv':''if1ces to the Engineer'ing Dfficers of the Department, and also provide good clf.-':pendable vehicl!?"..:: to HE higher offic::icds • .1.0.1 For efficient implementation of t.he project" imnediate rEquirE'iTlt:..4it of eli ffer-ent items of machinery plant and equipment "laS identifit-:..>d. I-k::Jw:?ver whi Ie invi bng bids for procuring tt"e Equij:ment quanti ties in the LCBIICB tenders VJeY-e restr-icted on the presumption that balance clf EqLlipment would be obtained en loan/transfer fn::m tJe sister d£c?partll)E!f1ts. It's ra....ever noticed trere have teen c:onsidet-able delays in ge.'tting trese EqLlipm€."I1ts fran the otl1er depad:ments. l..tllE',>S~::, tl1e Equiprent is not mobilised quickly this WOl.!ld affect pr'ogress of \A!Orks. Pcr.-siticn of such equip:nent is given below: Type Pc tuall y Recei ved/ required en transfer from othel'" deptt.s. Vibratory Roller"s (8IIOT) 2 5 Motor graders 1 1(1 Vibratory rollers (2T) 5 10 <:: ~:chanical Conpactors ~I :;;~) 10.2 The LCE! tenders for' the purchase of ten~ 2T vibratory rollers are received whi.le ICB ter',ders for the pLlrchase vibratory rollers (8-10T)-5 Nos; Pneumatic tyred rollers - 5 Nos and l"btl.:>r gr-aders 2 Nos~ \A.lere due on S?ptanber 1, 1989. Fot- LCB 81, ICB terlders 7 81, 17 firms rlave pLtrchased the tender docLiments. It is necess:..ary to procure the machinery LtrgE;.'f1tly by finalising the bids on priority. 1.1.1 Inspi te clf the fact that even the revised targets ar'e not being lTet, G03 has nDt takE'll any rne:~aSl._lrI?!5 to mobilise ttl!::? field establishlrent iderJti. fied at the.> time of apprai~SC:iJ. posi tion of the technical field staff will tE clE:~af" fn::m t.he table given below. Sr" Category of Requi r-emE'I'l t Total Pctually No. Tecmical Staff as per- SPR Sancticned lM:l.r-king !'-.k:..'\S • Nos. Nos. 1. Sttper-intE?rlding Enggineer- 4 E>~. Engineer- 17 9 9 Dy. E:-:. Engineer- a) P.A. to S.A. 4 2 b) Sub U1. Off ice 68 :34 4. A.E./A/A/E/s 335 172 Total Field staff 221 ==========--==========================~~====== 11.2 Oi: the limited staff sanctic:ned so far- ~ trer-e have been fr-Equer'!t chal"1Qes in the key posts like CE/SE. Tile si tLtatic71 neecls to be r-ecti fied imnlE'diatel y if the pr-oject implemE!'t1taticn is to be expidi ted befor-e the si tuatic:n qets out of contr-ol. 12.1 Al thcugh s.oTIe tr-ainin(::J Ca..Ir-5eS have been ar-r-anged in the Engg. Staff College Gabdhinaqar- ~ tJeCause of delays in ."anc:ticning the n:;:.'quirt.""CI staff, the prc:lgr-am is going very slCl(.\l. F:(egar-ding over-seas t.r-aining, the matter- is getting delayec:1 in view of the irrvol vement o'f thr-eE? ministr-i(,?S of t.he OOI. DEA is LU....ged to give its ear-Iy appr-oval to the over-seas shor-t ter'm tr-aining ca..tr-SE?':S r-ecOlTl/TlE'l1ded by the pr'evia.ts missic:ns. 13. 13 •. 1 Th:.~ CF:G has developed a c:omputel~ized pn::lject moni tor-ing system. TI-e pn:Jgress r-er-or-ts ar-e new being avai lable as computel. . pr·inta.rts and in t.he 'fol'"!T!ats sLlitablf-:? for- mc::ni tor-in9 the di ffer'ent aspects o'f the pr-ojE:x:t at di ffer-ent levels of the I:;:'r-oject administn:ltion. The for-mats ar'e getting r-efined (71 the basis of fur-ther- e>:per'ience gained dur-ing actual mcni·tod.ng. It',for-t.unately tt-e R 8( B det.')ar-tment has not been adf..':.quatel y equipped to take eNer- this job fr-om [fo\'(., and !-Ic:lf1dle the t:;,anE inciepa."IIdentl y. The missicn r-ecorrroends tr'fat ~ selected staff in cir'cle of·ficl;?,':; and Chlf?'f Ehgineer-s (Jffice (-let fully tr-ained to oper-ate the system. It is also f?S:.sential that tl"l!?se of1"icE<S; be given necessar-y har-dwar-e for- this PI"\I~pOse. J:3.::? Reqar-ding apl=Ointment of ccnsul tant for- the maintenance planninq stL\dy the HS,B depad:mE.'flt is awaiting clear-arlce fr-Dm the Finance Deparbnent to the TeF: etc. TE?rltativ€:!'l'l actions ar-e planned as tiE~Ic..~. Seph,:mber- :!~) ~ 1S'89 TORs to be sen t to the c:cnSLll tan ts I'Jovember- 15, 1989 TE.'Cmical F'r-o~-.a1 s wi th pr-ice bids 6 to be rEceived from the ccn!!:>L11 tants,. DecE;nber- .15, 1989 -- Ev.::duation 8, recoom:.;:ondr:'ltions to be sent to the Bc::\llk for' clear'ance. - Cc.."mpletion of the study. 14.1 Since tr:e RQf;;\d User char-ge study ~ tein!.;:J carried out unde!~ the 1\1-1 Pr'ojE:."Ct, (U'i 2::.34--IN), has nc.t been finalised i t would not be I=lCEsible forr ' [JeG tel r-eviE'W the<:..:;e c:1k..':!f1gl':.."S and ciisc::u!5S the findings wi th the Bank be'for-e JUnE? 1 ';>9(). 14.2 The project rC)ads ar'e gE,tting c::omplet€i:'d at p.':lce slowEw' than e;';pE'(::teci. TI""'e 2a:y. F:8t.B haf::; promis.E'(j thr3t the pn)ject n:'iad~;; WOLtld be giw-2f1 11lainh.::!f1ance tx..ldget accor-ding to the nonr~'::. r'ecOfllrner",deel by tre Eighth FiniElnce r,bTlffiission. 14.~!. In r"C-'?sj:::ec:t of n:li::ld saftey F'r-ognam GCG h.as to take any action. Th:i.~s rfk:\"y not bE) i:'.waili:tble befc.r-e June 1990. 15.1. For" implf::?fIlI':.."'f1ting tt-e pt-oject in 7' year's time, eulnual inves.,t.m€:.."'f",t If.:?vels nEed to i::l€? of tloe (.11~der- of Rs. ::::1.)0 to F~s. ~::;::,O m,illion. Lbfor-tunately the bL,ldget '::Illcx::i:.'itic:ns 'f'or' the "'JOY"k during FY EJCU90 are cr'll,y Rs. 142.5 millicrls '::\fId i:.'lre rr.uch IJell.Jl.-\l U"It:? desireel level. [-{"IG shculd lreke ell 1 out efforts to allocate all tJe funds requin?d "/'or s<::\tisfactory cDmpleticn clf t~ project according to the agl'"eecl program and l-'lithin tl'if.:? project period. 16,.1 The? claims lodgE'd LIr,der 43 applicatiCT;s SUbTiitted so far total Rs. 94.46 million. GCB has recf.?:i.VE.'{j reimturSf.,ment of Rs. 8'7.79 million. 16.2 Missi.c.TI reviev..tE.'Cj SCoffiE~ 01: the Y"eimtx..lrsefnent applications pr'eparE'd by th? project autt"Odties. en the per-usal of SOTIE' o'f the applications fol k..wing ob~;;er-vat.ions elY"e bn:x..lg~lt to the notice: sc:rre vC::t.lchers are ,UI€::"'9it:ll(7?; 5011'18 vo..u:hers- ar(;! wi th::x.lt stamped rE:."Ceipts of the contr.::\ctors; USf? of fOr-fTlf:; wtlich are entirely in GLtjarati Language SNJLtld be avoided; Vo..,lchers fTM..,ISt car'r-y piKkage numter en the f'::lce sheet; and de:::.c:riptiorl of work is not given in the Sl.lJrmary sheets accomp.:."'\nying the SCEs. 17.1 ALtdi t certi f icate are require::<:l to be Sl..lbmith:.~ to the Bank wit.hing <:., of the c lose of each financial year. TI-e certi'fic:ate format c:jem~t'-ally ITx::nth~:; USE?d on trif.? bank as.sistEd Highl'lay Pt-ojec:ts was h,:-:u-Ide:d over to tt-e CE for infonnation • lB.l The mj,sicn met tile H' ble:· I'ti,nister for F<oads & E\Jildings. Luring me:eting~ the H' blf.? Ministet- m:pliained that tre State's financial positicn has not bE,.,,€::)rl -fully r~"'CDvered from the pressure due t,o lon9 c:c:ntinuons dr-ought thG~ stah~ e>(periF...If1ced prior tt') 19B3.. !--Ie aSSLlr-t-d that the stab? will complete the pr-oject, suc::cE"5sfull y but may r'equir"€~ SL'""(]'lEo e>:tE!I'1sions cyf tilTlf.:? !--le e)·:plainec:l that SC:oIJ'IE.> road v,lor-ks (!",1Qrth .:'II::x::ot Rs. 100 million) had to be droppc-d fnJll) the pr"ojec:t oc.::.c::aus:-€ of thf.'~i!''' completion by t.re local autt-ori ties during the long interva'ling pt?I'"icd~ beh~"l <:.''Ippr"aiS',c.'il arH:j the actual ~:;tar·t ('"f the Wodd Bank pl~oject. He Ulii?rei'or-e Y"E'Cjl,IE'S;tec:l that thE~ EIC:\nk shc~.Jld pen-nit t<:\king up nE.."'W road works in liE'Ll of trG,3e dt"'OPPE'i:J fr-olT! U1!2 pr"ojec:t. He al!s(J r-equested the mission to permit th=:m i:t::. ta~::f.i) up e;·:b::"""!~:=..ic:n~; of few pn)ject roads to connect acljacent vill"'\ge":::'. The mis~::;ic::n e;.:plained that unless tl"lf? project qatt'ft:,;'rs manEntum and achieves f;:;ubstarl'l:i",\.l pn:~:jress the questicn of taking up addi ticrlal road works cannot be consider-ed. WhL"'I1ever addit.ic.:ni::~l ro.Rds ':''in? porpossd such proj:.'i(:::<Sals ffX..ISt satisfy th€~ projE:ct objec:t..:i.VE'S; and the ec::oncomic criteria pre."S--cribecl in thE? SPt~:. A::~ r"E'i~Filr"ds e>:tensiclf)s to project Y"o.Rds, proposals wi tI"'l full deti:.'iils and ec:cn011ic ':;\1"10,\1 ys"is:. should LiE~ 5f.iif"lt to tt"e Oc.if1k in advance so that tre fiPpt-OVed e:-:tra IrJOrks cculcl be taken up aloog with tt-e main nk'ids. 8 pt::~7.'END IX 1 tvlr- • , \ I . P. Ke:\IT1C.i ar ~ Sr::?C:r-etaFY ~ R8<B Depat-tment Mr- • 1'1 " JII D"-"Ive, ChiEd Engin(*.!r- , E'l.lr-al !ic..1i::.~ds:; F'n:Jject t1F' , 1"1. M. P",\tel, BE, F\'Fij=' Cin::lf?~ Eic:\IIcir·,inal;)i:"lr-/Palanr.JLlr- Mr" • H. B. Patel, OSD~, ~oJor-ld F.h:ilf1k Cell Mr'. Y. N. F'anclya~ ~:)E~ l'il€~!C:t-!C:-ud.cal ~ OED Mr-. C. 1'1. 1'1a t hEo"?W , EE, F~', Gand hina<.Jat- 9 APPENDIX 2 PRlXiRESS REPORT Fill Tff PERIOD EHDIN6 JI.LY 31. 1989 Packages Jobs Length Length (Category-wise in KJI) Cost!! (Rs. H) No. No. KII t[ RC IIp Civil WorKs Project I. SM Estimate 287 1025 4M2 lOll 9Z.a 2023 1724.7 2220.5 II. Progratl agreed by 003 CIlI by end of Ji.arc h 1990 220 8B3 3492 916 Ba5 169'.2 1490.0 1918.3 !'larch 1991 287 1025 4042 1031 9B8 2023 1724.7 2220.5 III. Progress culUlative by July 31, 1989 ?J al Adain. Approval NIl 5b~ .2123 63(\ 583 910 7297 bl Tech. Sanction NIl 517 1859 525 $34 BOO 5BB8 c) Ready for bidding i I Total 130 474 1629 4IlS %1 600 5155 ii) In progress 32 102 410 B2 113 215 1370 iii) Con tracts finalized 98 372 1220 40b 349 %5 378J d) Land/owned/acquired 635 E!) Physical Progress i) Length cOIPleted 152 ii) Equivalent cllIJIletion 359 f) Financial Progress i) Expenditure (cUllUlative) 103.9 158.10 ii) Budget FY 89/90 13.0.6 142.5 iii) Expr. during FY 89/90 22.9 41.0 ------ ------ g) Re ilbursellen t i) Eligible Expr. Rs. H. 87-97 iiI Clails lodged: Total up to appl. No. 40 date July 24 1989 Rs. II 97.97 iii) Received up to June 30, 1989 Rs. II. 7.4 (l15llR) iv) Present Balance as III 30 June, 1989 Rs. 11.93.6 (I'ISDRI !! Costs including physical contingencies and price contingencies ?J £il August 10, 1989 600 gave All for 237 jobs costing Rs. 414.7 t1illioo. 10 CREDIT 1'757 -. IN C:U.:JPRi'-iT h'Lf"..:Pt.. F'CJADS F'fiOJECT AU3lBT :::"'8 - 31, 19'"d9 P<.:~c:kage I\bs. JP - 1 to JP - 10 9 Nos (~JF'9 S, 10 c:clffibinoo) 8~ .n cOlTlbined) • t:. JP 12 to JP 1. ~1 :::;; Nos. (.:.If' 12 QI§T ~..J:::I.H~.t!8T1'±~ Package tbs. 1-f;'1 to f-P - 5 ~I 1\b5. I-P7 to I-F' 12 F'ackag&? Nos. RP1 t.o FiP 10 9 !\tE. (F<F7 8~ 8 cOf!lbined) F\'F'12 1 1\t.1S. Total 11 APPENDIX 4 INDIA Gl.lJMAT RmAI.. ROADS PROJECT: CR 1757 IN PERFORl1ANII OF TWO T(f PRfllW.lfIED COOAACTIJIS Rs. in Lakhs --------- Work in Progress Index Agency Naie Fir. Prequali fied Pack Aloont Put Tender Work Date Date of Financial Z Tille Code IIIount r~. to tender Aiount Done Start Complete CoIpl'n Progress Elapsed ----------------------- Visanagar TaMa VI1StI 750.00 SPOOO 24.040 25.390 16.850 02/12/87 01/03i89 44 66 133 Mandli 1'IPOO5 23.730 24.960 10.960 07/03/88 061031'111 16 44 142 If'OO9 21.910 23.170 1MbO 07/03/88 06103189 72 B4 142 RPOOb 21.180 31.100 10.610 24/03/88 24/03/88 47 34 140 MPOO8 34.390 35.580 20.110 24/11187 23/05/89 45 57 111 1fI010 34.440 35.920 22.400 07/03/00 Ob/O9!ffI 58 63 92 JP005 28.450 31.090 14.640 14/03/88 14/09189 42 47 92 !'fOO2 29.120 31.~ 12.837 14/03/88 14/09189 36 41 92 HPOO9 38.300 48.570 7.030 14/03/88 14/09189 20 17 92 BPOO9 51.270 54.250 15.340 10/02/88 091021118 19 28 93 JP004 36.520 40.900 1.960 15/04/118 15/10lffl 11 5 lib RPOI0 bO.990 hB.600 0.800 14/03/89 14/09190 0 1 25 KP031 41.930 44.'199 4.690 09/06/89 08/12/90 2 10 7 ••1 SUb total II. 750.00 452.270 4118.029 157.770 Gujarat State Coostn. Co. GSCC 500.00 1'f024 17.730 19.850 0.000 18/()4/89 17i04/90 0 0 29 ff007 34.590 37.690 4.510 22/02/118 22108/89 2B 12 94 APOO1 40.980 43.850 21.660 12/02/118 11/10/89 72 49 00 SPOOl 40.930 45.020 39.070 17/02/88 16/02/90 118 87 73 APOO4 43.120 48.330 4.580 'fl102/88 21102/90 6 9 70 1IP018 21.350 24.870 1.420 11/0.4/89 10/04190 0 b 'J!I RPOO4 55.320 60.320 5.200 22/02/118 21/04/90 8 9 70 RP007 55.170 61. 740 24.630 22/02/00 'fl/04/90 28 40 70 1f021 41.190 %.950 0.000 18/04/89 17/04190 0 0 19 II. SUb total ••• ~.OO 350.380 388.620 101.070 ------------------- 12 APPENDIX !i 6lIJAAAT III.AA.. RIW1S PROJECT CR 1737 IN SIAM IF LEGAl.. IllVENA...IS Agrllf!El'lt Sectioo status Original Revised Description of CoIients Date Date --------------------- ,---,-------- Developllll!llt Credit 3.01 (a) Al::t Section 3.01 (a) The BorrDIEr Even after 2 years the declares its ctlMitlent to the project has becOl1e effective, objectives of the Project as set full staff has not been forth in Schedule 2 to this Agreement, mobilised and in field units and, to this end, without any fully equipped. The plant and limitation or restriction upon any of equip. needed for the project its other obligations under the on transfer frDl other Sovt. Developaent with tr~ provisions deptts has not been received. of the Project Agreetleflt all the Procureaent for civil uks obligations all action, including the is lagging behind due to provision of funds, facilities, shortage of staff. Funds services and other resources, allocated, though at 30~ to necessary or appropriate to enable 40~ of the expected levels, Sujarat to perfor. such obligations, are not being spent. Progress and shall not take or permit to be is far bel!J!j the SAR targets. taken any action which would prevent Staff (overseas) trainin~ or interfere with such perforllance. progrillS are yet to be formulated. Project Schedule 2 1.SOOO Dec. 31, 1989 Dec. 31, 1~0 1. Gujarat shall: (a) carry out a 606 would be receiving Maintenance Planning Study in consultants bids by Nov. accordance with terms of reference 1!i! 1989 and the study is acceptable to the Association; (b) e~pected to be cOlpleted have it cOIIpleted by Dec. 31, 1988; by Dec. 31, 1990. and (c) thereafter discuss its findings with the Association. 2. ():: 2. Sujarat shall undertake an EcooDlic evaluation has been econOlic evaluation, for each Project cOlpleted for all roads and road, satisfactory to the Associatioo. details supplied to the Bank. 3. £B( 3. Gujarat shall introduce a Project The consultant, 006, has Monitoring System for the ilplesent- developed and introduced the ation of the Project. system. HoItever there have been SOI1e delays in operating the sale by PWD. , ' 13 4. IlK 4. Sujarat shall, at the COl2llC!!ll!llt The FY 89-90 construction of each financial year, accord prograa has been accorded Dlbrella administrative approval to umbrella Adainistrative each year's construction prograa apprDvals on 10th August '89, under the Project. after considerable delays. 5. m 5. Sujarat sr.~ll: (a) beginning April Since very small number of 1, 1988 provide funds for road roads have been physically aaintenance at levels acceptable to cOll!pleted, so far, the work of the Associatiooj and (b) uintain these ll!alntenance is not so levels in real teras throoghtout the problE!liltic, Roadwise funding Project period. details are still illIiited frOll! the SOS.

Key facts
Organisation World Bank Group
Document type Working Paper
Adoption date
Country India
Source World Bank