India - National highway project : aide memoire (November 2 - December 12, 1988)

 170224 73091 INDIA Loan 2534-IN -. National Highway Prgiect Visit of IBRD Mission Rovember 2 to December 12, 1988 Aide Memoire 1. Introduction 1.1 A highway mission comprising Robert Mulligan visited India during November and early Oecember, 1988, and in conjunction with other project matters carried out a supervsion of the current National Highway project. Mr. C.S. Nawathe of RMD joined the mission. 1.2 This Aide Memoire summarises the mission's discussions with the officials of GOl and the six states responsible for implementing the project. However, the conclusions and recommendations recorded here are subject to confirmation by the Bank. 1.3 The mission wishes to record its appreciation of the assistance received from all concerned in the states and in the Ministry of Surface Transport (MOST). Attachment 1 lists the principal officials met. 2. Background 2.1 Loan 2534-IN was approved on May 9, 1985 and signed on September 16, 1985, in the amount of US$ 200 million to finance: (i) the construction/reconstruction to appropriate standards of about 520 km main roads in six state~; (ii) the procurement of imported equipment to assist MOST and the states in monitoring road condition and usage and to promote road safety: ( iii) technical assistance and training for professionals in MosT/state highway organizations; and ( iv) studies by consultants/GOl research qroups to esta:blish;· , ",I' ... N018NIHS~M ~N~8al~OM wo~~ ££ . Ot·l  170225···· Page 2 (a) the desirable extent and direction of modernization of Ihdia's motor vehicl ~ fJ.~~p,t.; and (b) desirable levels of road-user charges. 3. Civil Works Gujarat 3.1.1 This state's component is the construction of a 93y~ limited access expressway between the cities of Ahmedabad and Vadodara, a priority link in the highly congested corridor between Ahmedabad and Bombay. 3.1.2 The joint venture Continental Construction/Balfour Beatty (CC/BB) is responsible for the principal road works and the parastatal National Building Construction corporation (NBCC) is responsible for the principal structural work. Both contractors have experienced delay, primarily through slow mobilisation. However, CC/BB now have five earthwork units building the embany~ents and each is capable of placing and compacting 2000-3000 eu.m. of fill/day. This mobilization would have been adequate, but as a result of a resurvey and rechecking of levels and alignment, earthwork quantities have increased by 20% from 10 million to 12 million cu.m. This substantial change, besides highlighting major errors in the original survey in respect of both line and level, creates a problem of project cost and timing. The contractor's present mobilization of earth-moving equipment will need to be augmented further if the work is to be finished without seriously over-running the scheduled completion date, and there will be a proportional increase in contraot costs. 3.1.3 The contractor is having a serious cash-flow problem caused by the backlog of deductions from his paz~ent certificates recovering the equipment/mobilization advance. As one construction season was lost since contract signature because of the slow mobilization: deductions, which should have commenced six months from signature date; could not be made from that time as no work had been done and hence no payments were due. Now that earthworks are in full swing and monthly payments are being made, the backlog of deductions is being levied with the consequence that the contractor receives very little cash from each certificate. It is in the interests of the project that the contractor should be encouraged to increase his output, but he cannot do so if financially handicapped. The mission suggests two courses of action that MOST/GOG should consider: , ".l' , . NOlSNIHS~~ ~N~8Gl~OM WOd~ tZ:61 88. ·tZ·Zt(a3~)  Page 3 (i) ~educe to one the number of duductions recovering the mobilization advance from each payment certificate, and extend the period over which deductions are claimad (but see para 3.11.1); and (ii) providing the contractor a further advance, secured against equipment, so that he can bring additional earthwork teams on site. Unless decisive action is taken now, the project will overrun substantially in time and, consequently, cost. MOST should investigate the reasons for such substantial errors in the initial survey work, ascertain where the responsibility lies, and ensure that components proposed for the Second National Highway project are prepared on the basis of accurate field data. 3.1.4 A condition of the joint-ventura's prequalifica- tion for the works is that senior contract management should be provided by Balfour Beatty. This stipulation has not been met. No Balfour Beatty staff are providing management guidance on site and the sole representative met by the mission is located in Delhi and makes ocoasional visits to the project. MOST should ensure that this condition of the joint venture is enforced. 3.1.5 The contracts for the structural work, with the exception of rail oVer-bridges, were awarded to the parastatal National Buildinq construction corporation. This contractor is well behind schedule and is· insufficiently mobilised. The critical operation at the moment is the sinking of foundation wells for the bridge works and the shortage of cranes on site is delaying progress. If he is to produce work at the scheduled rate he would need about 10-12 cranes to service his foundation operations. The mission saw none employed on wel~-sinking work on the sites visited. The contractor is also claiming',cash-flow problems because of increased quantities of work. Discussion on site revealed that the main cause of these problems is the increase in concrete quantities for the walls of the wells which is due to two factors: (i) the correction of the contractor's own oonsultant's original under-design of the wall thickness, the cost for which the contractor would be responsible; and (ii) a subsequent revision of the speoification for the wall thickness for which MOST would be re~ponsible. .. _, l , , .,- , N018NIHStl~ ~Ntl8aldOM WOd~ lZ:61 ::::::, 'lZ'Zl(I:]3(I'I) 9Z 38t1d  170227·'· ';j page 4 T' , 3.1.6 NBCC is one of India's largest parastatal construction organisations, and according to its prequalification submission, appears on paper well able to muster the equipment needed to mobilise satisfactorily for this project and to have the financial resources to meet the project/s cash-flow needs. The contractor's progress to date does not bear any relationship to its prequalification claims and project management does not demonstrate any sense of urgency in meeting its commitments on what is undoubtedly India's most prestigious r~ad work. 39197 NBCC's works are-practically at a standstill, and the mission understands that the company has informed the PWD that it is unable t6 proceed without fUrther interest- free advances. In view of the company's lack of progress on its other contracts under the project, further advances are unlikely to stimulate increased activity and would serve only to increase its indebtedness to Government. After discussion of the situation with MOST and FWD, and in the interests of c9mpleting the project, the mission agrees that the best course is to invoke Clause 63 of the contract conditions, and because of persistent lack of performance, withdraw Contracts 1 and 2 on which little work has been done from NBCC and rebid them among contractors already prequalified recently for another Bank-financed project. NBCC could then concentrate its resources on completing Contract 3 and 4 on which work is relatively well advanced~ The values of Contracts 1 and 2 as bid are Rs. 113.6 million and Rs. 130.2 million, respectively and to date Rs. 15.8 million and Rs. 20.8 million has been expended. Haryana 3.2.1 The project provides for the construction of a second two-lane carriageway and the rehabilitation of the existinq two-lane road between Murthal (km 50.0) and Karnal (km 130.0). The work is divided into four contracts, the first of which from km 50-74.8 (Murthal to Smalka) was awarded to the parastatal NBCC, and the remaining three from Smalk~ tn K~rnal (km 74.S~130), to CC/DD. 3.2.2 As in Gujarat and uttar Pradesh, a recheck of the original survey has revealed major errors in the levels on which the project design was based, As a result earthwork quantities were oVer-estimated by 60% and subbase under- estimated by 20%. The contractors whose bids were therefore erroneously based have grounds for complaint. Notwithstanding the reduced scope of work, NBCC, as in Gujarat, is well behind schedule with less than 3% completion against a scheduled 25%. NBCC has subcontracted earthworks and cross-drainaqe works to Messrs. Nangia Ltd., a Delhi firm. NBCCjNangia have promised to provide by mid- December a revised work program based on a time-based plan N019NIHS~M ~N~8al~OM WOd~  1. 7028 8 ':. ' ,~,,, Page 5 to bring their equipment 'mobilization up to the strength needed, and MOST and the Haryana PWD are requested to press for its submission and to review its practicality. CC/BB are also incompletely mobilized and, as in Gujarat, are not meeting the condition of their prequalification in that there is insufficient managerial presence of the expatriate partner. The senior managements of both partners are meeting with MOST in Delhi on December 15 to discuss the joint-venture arrangements and in particular the Balfour Beatty participation. MOST should keep the Bank informed of the meeting's outcome and further developments Present 9 progress on their three contracts is 9%, 7% and 3%, an overall picture calling for prompt remedial action. 3.2.3 The mission was informed that some of the culverts under the existing carriageway are damaged. This should be investigated, as the needed repairs/replacements should be included in the rehabilitation works. Punjab 3.3.1 This-project component involves seven contracts for tha construction of a new two-lane carriageway plus strengthening of the existing two-lane road between Sirhind and Jalandhar (km 252.25 - 372.70). Four contracts are for road works, two for bridges and one for a road/rail overbridge. 3.3.2 The first road works contract, from Sirhind to Khanna (km 232.25 - 275.53) was awarded to Messrs. Indian Railway Construction Corporation (IRCON), a parastatal organization, in June 1987, and with almost half the 36 month construction period expired, completion is less than 10%. MOST and FWD should maintain pressure on the contractor to mobilize sufficently to complete the works as nearly within the contract period as possible. A review of this contractor's progre~s will be a particular objective of the next Bank highway mission. 3.3.3 The remaining three road contracts from Khanna to Jalandhar (km 275.53 - 372.7) were awarded to the Afcons/Pauling joint-venture (India/UK) in May 1987 and from a work organization point of view, are being regarded as one contract. There was a long initial delay whilst import arrangements for equipment were being made, and initial misunderstandings resolved. Now new importe.d equipment is arriving on site and the work is gearing up in an orderly fashion. Although the start-up has been slow, there is a good prospect of the works being finished on time. The joint-ventura is meeting its prequalification agreement and the work is being competently managed by Pauling's personnel. ~:; • Ot,j £Z=61 8:::,'lZ'Z~ G31i l l N018NIHStl~ ~N~8aldOA WOd~ 8:::: 38tld  170229 Page 6 3.3.4 NBCC has been awarded the two bridge contracts, and, as on its other contracts under this project, is making little progress on one and virtually no progress on the other. The latter contract (Bridge Package 1) comprises two canal crossings and there is no evidence of the oontractor;s presence on site. As for the bridge works in Gujarat, MQST, the FWD and the mission see little prospect of the contractor's even starting the work before the end of the 30 month contract period (22 months have already passed) a.nd the contract (Rs. 48.8 million, Rs. 6.73 million expended) should be withdrawn and rebid as suggested in para 3.l.7. Mace would be left to complete Package 2 on which there is some progress. Tamil Nadu 3.4.1 The project oomponent-in this state comprises six contracts for the improvement of NH 45 (Madras-Dindiqul National Highway) from Madras to Villapuram in the south. The first two contracts, from km 2i/8 to 67/0 involve the construction of a new two-lane carriageway plus improving and strengthening the existing two-lane road. The works also include the construction f a new four-lane bypass of the town of Chengalpattu (7.4 km) between km 54.4 and 61.8. 3.4.2 The two contracts were awarded to the lowest evaluated bidder Mis. Byford-Ragi, an Indian/Italian joint venture, on May 26, 1987. However, the firm apparently had second thoughts about its bid, and persistently failed to execute the contract and provide its performance guarantee, but went to court to prevent the Government's voiding the contract and rebidding. After the period stipulated by the Court to stay the PWD's abandonment of the contract had expired on January 12, 1988, the contract was cancelled and fresh bids were invited. However, the new bids are substantially higher than the previous ones, to the extent that MOST needs to obtain fresh financial authority to execute the works. This approval is expected shortly. However, the mission understands that the low bidders for each of the contracts are the parastatals',NBCC in conjunction with Oriental construction (oce) and IRCC, respectively. The histories Qf both NBCC and IRCC on this projeot are sorry ones. NBCC is unable to mobilize in sUfficient strength to carry out any serious work, and IRCC is acting as an agent, subcontracting the work and doing none itself. Despite their prequalification olaims which bear little relationship to their performance, the mission concurs with MOSTjPWD that to award them further contract works would be to invite yet further poor performance. Under the circumstances and unless the joint venture NBCC/OCC is demonstrably stronge~ than NBCC, the mission .~ - .. N019NIHSI:I~ ~NI:I8aldO~ WOd~ 6;: 381:1d £i £ • (I t~  ," ... "-::'" ."'. ;'- . ""'7' '~., 1 02~10 Page 7 strongly recommends setting tne bids for both contracts aside and awarding the contracts to the next lowest bidders, disregarding the Bank's 'no objection' telex, provided the contractors concerned agree to extend their periods of bid validity. 3.4.3 The two contracts for the remainder of the road works comprise the widening to 7.5 m and strengthening the existing ca~riageway between kID 67.0 and 104.0 and between }~. 104.0 to villapuram at kro 160.2. The works, which include geometric improvements to bring the road to IRe standards, were awarded to Atlanta Construction Cornapny of Bombay on January 28, 1987. This company had some initial problems in mobilising equipment of the size and perf.onnance needed to meet the construction specifications, but has now done so. Pavement works are at a temporary standstill until the south-east monsoon which affects Tamil Nadu, ends in late December/early January, but this lull will enable the contractor to catch up with the work needed to bring the shoulders up to finished level. At present there are considerable lengths of road where the completed bituminous base course stands several inches proud of the existing shoulders and this substantial drop is a hazard to traffic. This pervious base course could suffer water penetration and resulting damage during the monsoon rains, as the contractor should have sealed it with the asphalt carpet before ceasing pavement operations. Any damage will necessarily be to his account. 3.4~4 The contractor has three stone-crushing units installed at krn 85/4 with a capacity of 150 tonS/hour, but cannot operate his recently installed thrid unit because his application for an increased electricity allocation has not yet been approved. MOST should follow u~ progress on this application with the state PWD. 3.4.5 Atlanta is also constructing a new 16 x 10 m span bridge over the Kiliyar river at km 79/4. This replaces a multiple-arch bridge which, although aesthetic, ,is structurally unsound. Work is well advanced with the 15 piers and one abutment completed' and deck, beams in pla.ce for 7 spans, and should be finished by April i989, ahead of schedule. 3.4.6 The quality of ~tlanta/s workmanship is good as a result of having brought the appropriate equipment on site and at present there appears to be no reason why the contractor should not meet the March 1990 completion date. 3.4.7 The construction of a new 23 x 29.26 m span bridge across the Palar river at km 62/4 to 5 to accommodate the· new two-lane carriageway was awarded to the parastatal UP State Bridge Corporation, Lucknow, on December 15, 1986. To date all sUbstructure work up ~o .~ier cap level ha~ been • N018NIHS~~ ~N~8aldOA WOd~ 0£ 3E)I::!d ££'(H~  Page 8 completed except for the complBtion of the well foundation and the abutment at the Madras end. Twenty eight of the 46 prestressed concrete deck beams have been cast in place and the works are now 70% complete. The contractor's site is .... .-y. T_Jnni. •••• nli effioionl!lJ lUll, uIH.l LUI.! le.clel"L~ 111 LUi;! excellent quality of the work so far completed. The contract is expected to be completed at least three months ahead of the December 15, 1989 contract date. 3.4.8 The sixth work in this project component covers the construction of three rail over-bridges at Tambovam (~~ 27.8), Paranur (km 51.2) and Chingleput on the bypass. These works are being implemented, as agreed and as is customary in India, by the Rail Ministry which is better able to coordinate construction activities with the movements of rail traffic. The main spans are approximately 30 m and are designed to accomodate two additional rail tracks. Works are well advanced 'with progress ranging from nearly 80% on the first to almost 50% on the third. They will be completed well in advance of the road works and will not be a constraint in opening the road sections to traffic. 3.4.9 No withdrawal applications have been made in respect of these overbridge works, and MOST is requested to obtain documentation from the Rail Ministry that would support a claim for reimbursement from loan funds. The sum passed to the Rail Ministry is understood to be Rs. 25,720,000. Uttar Pradesh 3.5.1 This project component is the construction of a bypass of the city of Varanasi, comprising a new four-lane bridge over the river Ganga located about 2.5 km downstream of the present road/rail bridge, with about 39 km of new four-lane road, routing through traffic away from the highly congested city area. The project also includes road and rail overbridges. 3.5.2 The main contracts are'those fo~ the bridge and the bypass road works. The former, after prolonged litigation ended in July 1988, was finally open for award to the lowest evaluated bidder, Messrs. Hindustan construction Co. Both parties had signed the contract, but issuance of the order to commence had been delayed until the beginning of December pending the State's law officers' review of the contract. 3.5.3 The need for such a review at this late stage is difficult to understand. The State has had possession of the full contract docu~entation for two years - ample time for the most searching reviews to be made. However, the 'j N018NIHSt1~ ~Nt18aldO~ WOd~ l£ 38t1d ££ • Ot'1 ." l702J2 Page 9 mission understands that, in anticipation of the order to commence, Hindustan has commenced mobilization and has started trial borings to prove foundation conditions. His mobilization advance should be paid during December. 3.5.4 In october 1987, the State signed the contract for the bypass road works with the contractor Recondo, but deferred pay.ing his mobilization advance until February 1988. So far, Recondo has done little work beyond establishing site facilities ano installing some culverts~ The principal reason has been that a recheck of the original survey on which the design of the road works was based, has revealed sUbstantial differences between actual ground level and that shown on the contract drawings for some sections. These differences range between one and two meters - extraordinary in a work so comprehensively documented, and a situation which calls for a thorough investigation by MOST and the State authorities. However, the immediate consequence is that road work quantities are be1n9 recalculated, with implications on project cost and yet further delay. 3.5.5 The contractor is also contributing to delay, as there is insufficient equipment on site. However, at a Nove~er 30 meeting with MOST offioials in Delhi, senior management of Recondo undertook to have an agreed mobilization of equipment on site by the end of December. MOST should maintain pressure on the contractor to complete his mobili&ation and the next supervision mission should verify that this undertakin9 has been met. West Bengal 3.6.1 This project component comprises the construction of the first two lanes of the ultimate four-lane Durgapur Expressway, a 65 km facility which shortens by 19 km a long loop in the present NH 2, starting at Dankuni near Calcutta and terminating at Palsit. Construction of this project had started some years ago, but was abandoned through lack of funds. Only a little of the oriqinal wo~~s can be salvaged, as embankments do not meet th.e required standards and need to be recompacted. 3.6.2 The project is divided into six contracts for road works, one for major bridges and one for the rail overbridge. All six contracts for road works have been awarded to parastatal contractors, four to the Indian Road Construction Corporation (IRCC) and two to the National Projects Construction corporation (NPCC). The former has sub-contracted its work, contracts I and II to the local firm Recondo, and contracts IV and v to CEC Ltd., a Delhi firm. IRCC has so far played no 'active role whatsoever in • ~~. Ot·1 N018NIHSI:I~ ~NI:I8al~OM wo~~ 2£ 381:1d  ..: . (,.,. . . . .: _ " ....- ...... : ." ,,'I :J .' 170233 Page 10 the construction activities. Contract VIr comprises the construction of three major bridges and a road underpass and has been awarded to NPCC also. Contract VIII is with the Rail Ministry for construotion of an overbridge. 3.6.3 Unfortunately, the cyclone of November 28 so disrupted air traffic that the mission's visit to Calcutta was delayed .by one day and the field visit to the work sites had to be abandoned. It was not possible, therefore, to meet the contractors and supervisors. However, a review of progress was made with the Chief Engineer in calcutta. 3.6.4 On all contracts work is well behind schedule with contracts reflecting physical progress ranging from 0.3% in one case to 9.7% for contract VII. Two road contracts only show progress slightly greater than 1%; the remainder are less than that. With 15 months of the 42 month contract period (35% of the time) gone, it will need heroic efforts for the firms to catch up, and aven with the full mobilization promised by all participants, more clement weather and assured sources of materials, situations which are far from certain, the project is almost bound to overrun in time and cost, a sorry reflection on the capabilities of thA ~~r~~T~~~' ~;rm~ uh{~h ~~a t~~ F~~n. ~~n\ ••• ~.~.1 Tho February supervision mission should review with MOST/FWD and the contractors, progress in meeting their promised mobilizations and output and decide on what action, if any, should be taken. Civil Works - Conclusions Contractors 3.7 Experience to date throws into sharp contrast the performances of essentially two types of contractors those from the private sector and the parastatals. The private firms as exemplified by Atlanta, AfconsjPauling, Continental/Balfour Beatty, despite an almost universal slow mobilization and start-up, are making credible efforts to try and make up for lost time and in the ~ase of Afcons/Pauling with demonstrable results "now. With the signal exception of the UP St'ate Bridge Corporation whose workmanship and progress are exemplary in this project, the parastatals ' performance does not support their prequalification claims. IRCC is not participating actively and is acting as an agent for its sub-contractors. NBCC is under-equipped for key construction operations and two of its contracts on the Gujarat Expressway and one of its Punjab bridge contraots should be withdrawn. NPCC has yet to make its presence felt on its West Bengal works. Unless there is a rapid turn-round, the inclusion of parastatal contractors in the project will be the cause of its over- ., 'tj' ~£ • Ot4 ." 170234 Page 11 running substantially in time and cost. Clearly, the requests of these companies for prequalification to take part in further Bank-financed projects should be treated with caution. Project Preparation 3.8 The errors in the surveys on which the designs of the Gujarat"Expressway the Varanasi Bypass and NH 1 in Haryana were based were substantial, As a result quantities of embankment material on the fo~.er increased 20% to 12 million cu.m. for the Expressway, reduced by 40% in Haryana and the implications of the 1-2 m error in levels on sections of the Varanasi Bypass are not yet clear. These situations offer the contractors potential for claims on at least two grounds - changes in the amounts of work and delay. The situation is unacceptable as the accuracy of basic surveys is fundamental to' the design work which follows. The mission urges MOST to ascertain where the resoonsibilitv ';p~ fnr rh~~~ o~¥~rc ~~A +n ~--H-7 ~b.~ those concerned have no opportunity of repeating them on future Bank-financed work. Supervision 3.9.1 The project is being supervised throughout by the states' PWDs which have set up separate organizations for the purpose under a Chief Engineer in most cases. The nr9,~ni?:"Ir;t'".1'i ..-n,..,...rc Ch ..... n *.l.""iiliilitn .f rooponoibiliLJ [lum T.,T the Chief Engineer, through superintending Engineers to 1:' ...... t3,..,11+-~"' .... "C' .... T{- .......... ~ .... - .,.-~~-L--1 luJ.II •••• , nl.11 UHL HUHWLl:J of staff multiplying at each level. It is unclear to the mission which official and at what level" maintains day-to- day contaot with the contractor. Moreover, the charts show separate groups for quality control and contract management which coordinate at the superintending Engineer level and not at the Executive Engineer level where, the mission presumes, contact with the contractor is maintained. 3.9.2 Despite the diffusion of responsibilities inherent in such large organizations, the projects'.in one or two states are being carried out with less operational problems than others, particularly in Haryana where some streamlining of the organization has already taken place, but this situation CQuld be partly due to the quality and experience of the contractors. However, the mission is aware that a pervasive problem for the contractors which could lead to potential claims is the delay in receiving decisions on operational matters which are being referred to higher authority. In some instances the delays are due to the supervisor's unfamiliarity with the capabilities of the modern equipment now being employed on the road works, and the need to revise specifications to take advantage of them, but in othe~ cases supervisory ,staff are unavailable when lZ:6188,'tZ'::1,;:G31'1) N019NIH ~~ ~Nti8aldO~ w d~  17()235, ." Page 12 nr.r.dcd, Llowl;.vQ..} in ±ait"llf!Je.o Lu Lll1: lJuvcLyl:JUl~$ it must be said that communications are a problem. There are, reportedly, insufficient vehicles available for personnel supervising the Gujarat Expressway and this deficiency was cited in other states. Contractors are equipping themselves with radio communication equipment, and the mission strongly recommends that the supervisory staff be similarly equipped, particularly in Gujarat, West Bengal and UP, whe~e the alignments are not near existing roads. 3.9.3 To bring uniformity to the supervisory efforts in the six states, and to ensure that the personnel dealing with contractors on a day-to-day have some guidance in doing so, the mission strongly recommends that MOST engages the. services of a consulting firm experienced in the supervision of major road works to review the current procedures and advise how hest they could be streamlined so that the project does not suffer from p09r administration. The long list of consUltants provided for the States' Road Project could serve as the basis for short-listing firms to be invited, and the services sought could be on an \as- required' basis, providing MOST with a back-up pool of expertise when needed. There are sufficient funds under the project for this purpose. Project Administration and Reporting 3.10.1 Up to the present, MOST has had no separate cell to administer the worla Bank projects, and matters have been dealt with on an ad hoc basis. With the World Bank road programs expanding and the Asian Development Bank also taking up road works, MOST has now decided to set up a project cell to handle the foreign-aided projects. This is a welcome development as MOST will become- the clearing house for project-related matters. 3.10.2 One such, where coordination and 'uniformity among the six states sharing this project is necessary, is the matter of progress reports. All states are diligent in recording data relating to actual works contracts, providing the bar charts, the standard'S' curves, t~e target progress for the quarter in question, and the prog'ress aotually achieved. However, their defIciency as a management tool is that there is no explanation of the reasons for discrepancies between progress scheduled and progress achieved, and the reader is left unaware of problems Which have arisen or where potential problems are foreseen. Major issues such as the discrepancies in quantities resulting from survey errors in three of the states' projects are not mentioned and are revealed only on site visits. with mobilization and management of the project works appearing as major issues in some of the states, the proqres s reports should include the agreed list of equipment and personnel for each contract with, alongside, the inventories of those aotually on site during the report'period. An estimate of ££ 38tld £; £; 'Ot·j SZ.:6l :38,'lZ.-;:::l(G3f'1 N018NIHStlM ~Ntl8aldOM WOd~  Page 13 ::~vi.QQ ~Qntraot OO::Jt:J and completion dat8b blluultl La: involved as and when these are known, and to assist the Bank in its forecast of resources needed, an estimate by quarters of the likely payments under each oontract for a year ahead. This latter estimate should be updated with each quarterly report. The services of the consultant to MOST, sU9gested earlier, could be of assistance in ensuring uniformity and streamlining the procedures. Miscellaneous 3.11 Repayment of Mobilization Advance 3.11.1 Mention was Made earlier (para 3.1.3) of the problems contractors are having in meeting accrued repayments particularly when the start of work has been delayed. The situation is exacerbated by the fact that earthworks, which are carried out at the beginning of the project are a low pay item so that initial progress payments are likely to be small compared with pavement works which are done later in the project. Hence, the payment after deductions for the advance, retention money, etc. are, in some cases, less than the 1% of oontract price, which makes a certificate eligible for payment. A suggestion that has been made and is worthy of note, is that the 1% criterion should apply to the gross value of the certificate, and not the net value after deductions. 3.11.2 Another possibility for future contracts is that repayments of advances should commence after 10% of the work has been completed and be completed by the time 90% of the work is finished. 3.12 Eguipment Imports 3.12.1 The example of the mechanization of the Afcons- Pauling contracts is one that all contractors should see. It is encouraging to note that the two contractors in the adjoining state, Haryana, are now intending to import similar equipment, and the mission sees this intention as a positive commitment to completinq the con~racts effectivelYt and to maintain involvement in future road works in India. 3.12.2 This importation may exceed the foreign currenc requirement each firm has quoted in its bid. Neverthe:.p the amounts concerned are not significant compared with costs of the works and MOST/DEA should view their applications sympathetically. 3.12.3 One contractor, CCjBB is experiencing delays in receiving their foreign currency reimbursement, and it would be appreciated if this repayment could be expedited • • ££ • ot~ N018NIHS~~ ~N~8aldO~ wo~~  Page 14 contract Documents 4.1.1 It is clear that a deficiency in the conditionss of contract as they apply to works under this project, is a clause which sets forth work targets a contractor is required to reach by specified times during the contract. absence .of such provision allows firms with little motivation, such as NBCC to ignore requests for greater mobilization, increased productivity, etc. 4.1.2 The Bank's Sample Bidding Document prov for such a condition under Clause 47 of the Special Conditions of Contract, and it will be of Government's interest to ensure that such provision is made in the contracts for the proposed second Project. Project Studies 5.1 The Road-User Charges/Vehicle Fleet Modernization study provided for under the project nearing the of draft final report and its progress was reviewed at the end of October by Mr. Heggie, senior Economist and reported on separately. MOST informed the mission of Mr. Heggie's recommendation that a joint GOl/Bank team review the study findings with a view to developing policies and strategies that would form the framework for the financing and development of the national network in the future. The mission agrees that a cooperative approach would be desirable and will pursue the matter with the Bank. Equipment 6.1 Orders have been placed for most the equipment to be purchased under the project, and some items have already been deliVered and are in service. 7. Next Proposed High~~ission 7.1 As the states have informed the, mission that budget preparation takes up most of their 'staffs' time during March, the next proposed it by a highway ion shoUld take place in February' 1989, at which time a review of the performance of road contractors in the light of the mobilizations they have promised, should be made. Attachments: EZ : 6 t 8 " T ;:::. : ': G3 Pi'  17()2(lS Page 15 First National Highway Project (Ln.2534-IN) List of principal Officials Met Messrs.-K.K. Sarin, DGRD R.P. Sikka, CE (T&T) V.K. Arora, CE (R) North A.K. Kaul, CE (R) South D.K. Bhalla, DFO, Internal Finance N. Shankar Raman, SE (WBP) S.B. Basu, EE (WBP) DEA: K.Y. Narasihan, SO, DEA Planning Commission: B.N. Puri, Dy. Advisor, Tr. state Governments: Gujarat: Messrs. V.P. Kamdar, Secy. R&B Dept. M.P. Jamdar, eE, Expressway D.H. Pandya, SE, Baroda M.. S. Patel, SE, Ahmedabad Awasthi, Director, CC&BB Maker, Resi. Engg., CC&BB Rupal, eE, NBCC Haryana: D.B. Gupta, eE, N.H. D.P. Gupta, SEt N.H. Ajit Singh, RO, MOST Lainsl. Commercial Manager, CC&Br' Hill,"Project Ma·nager, CC&BB Kumaran, Project In-charge, CC&B~ s. Nangia, Subcontractor, NBCC S.K. Behl, Dy. proj. Mgr., NBCC Punjab: s.s~ Monghia, eE, N.H. If H s d 1'!l, SE, N." H., Patiala Gurubax Singh, SE, N.H. I Chand:lgarh Ajit singh, RO, MOST V.S. Chauhan, Sr. Manager, IRCON Broomfield! Proj.Mgr., Afcons Pauling Tamil Nadu: v. Gurumurthy, CE, N.H. Allagapan, SE, Chingl~put Thirunarukkaresu , SE, Tindiranam Raju Bhanot; Atlanta Constn.· 6 Z. : 6 1 ::: 8 , • 1 Z. • Z 1 ( IJ :3 N018NIHStlM ~N~8al~O~ WOd~ 8:::: 381:1d ££ . Ot·j  110' I'"., 1, ,'" ~, ..... ,n - • • " .. ' 1-7n2.~~ Page 16 Uttar Pradesh: A.K. Bhatnagar, eE, N.H. R.C.Misra, SE, N.H., Allahabad T.C. Sood, SE , MOST, Lucknow P.K. Gangopadhyay, Res.Engg.,Recondo West Bengal: H.S. Verma, E-in-C , PWD S.K. Sen, eE, N.H. (Durgapur Exp/w) K. Mitra, ACE, N.H. " Chattopadhyay, SE (PIg.& Dsgn.)11 S • R.t Daysarkar, BE I It C.R. Das, SE~ MOST, Calcutta Malik, SE (Mech.), MOST, Calcutta 6£ 3Elttd ££'0 0:::' :61 :::::::,' 12 'Zt.: G3f"i'! N018NIHSttM ~Ntt8al~OM w ~~  I '~Vj,:1 I::;:' ':j- IL!:'..LL oll"'!L If:irHil11 PFiOJ Eel . lIJ ill cr !.t-I:'S.~~ CL . t~ .2.!V (I ~_~_.~ r .( rtl'f I 0-11 EndlllO ll) HE! In If) -=. z !it.att> wortS hOjE-I:l Pac:tili~e C.[) "tr ac t Cent ... act _ .. e .f Date of C-cunln. hprulr .. 1 h-og:,-ess. hE'lI .. r~ So 10' Hn, local] 0"''5 CO.pOhl!llIt "'G. SS9 1lJD l) ,()ah! \toil .... " _nt_ctnf Ca ••ence- ••nt Herin" in 11/88 Phy. FI~. hi. _R~ H!nll!i: .lt4l1.- SU)i/i.-,at ~ c;.1 t<1 £~ ores_1~ (f'. 0- .. 5.1 7 "B I 12. i1.at:. 113. f N•• Lt. 01.20.61 Jb 1~ .. 8(1 l n (0 I~t-l 1-92.85 ::t 11[1 it 12. W .. &" 13(.1.2: II.L(;.C. 01.2l.B1 42 20.8& .. H I~ (1-45.1 lY' Oll; :0:.1 HI 12'.11.8' It .. ": C. c. OJ. 11.81 16 17 .10 20 N I~' J .841 -UP S£ 45.I-n.85- 21 -do- IV 12 .. h'.9'6 65 .• ~. Et.C. 36 16. .. 80 13 l5 4)-45. 45.1-9'2.8S j ApDro.acju~s to 8lfs .& Uh - Ii.o JUA !VA 01.21.81 i)]. ~2.8J - c.l.b 56.~ ~r Ii. :: Ct. Jns-ln. (108.2 .... 81 1)8.:21J.67 lb 36 ?I:5 it. 56 3 [I " ~:9'. 71 f{OB~ 2'9.01 .. 89 11.4 ~.C=l;O.j 11.QI.Ci'" 12 12. -t:S. 45 :c.o~tJ no· i'd'Se to 14.8 dIIIIt:".fOlll1d- lin" 39.9", r e spec t i y~! 1'. .a 0.-- 99.4 jt. 9oiJ.4:> '2 :kO(t;s II 25.~ ~. 'iv~r- 21. 01. {IY 18 2/).90 4] s, ( .'litll. .... {J·I to h.Oillll!Hork V OJ.25.S} 123..6 ( ~t i !!\t,H {15 .. 0j .8] ~, 24.41) S ;E :t .0nU . 50 (leld), !il-3.l - DO - VI ('3..2'5.81 98.2 C-,t - Lt41. 1)'5. OJ. 87 57 1(10.7-4 H 7:.1 f- lell llH 1S_t:t Jo~II't V ,tLl It Q I- 32-"5_1 - do - VII v::S.25.87 14'1.1 - -= - 05.0-1. 87 51 2'6 .. '9(10 . tb 1 .DI'lth ·s ad ... ., l:!:l 45.1-5'9'.1 - 410 - VI II ~3.2.S.81 144.1 00. OJ.. 91 57 18.'10 U' ::z: 59.1-75 .. (10 - do - 11 03.25.81 118.5 (t6.01.B1 51 Il.BO 3 U :::r: 75.0-92.85 - do - I 0$.05 .. 87 141.3- (l5.0~.87 57 H.20 '9' z:j tt"! Ct :3 • H..ttJ'r.ani* -'"- ~ ::z: (J: uL 11.87 (l.) 5(1-74.8 KOildhi or t. 08.250.81 94.4 .&-=.f.. 42 HI .. 41 2 J 1 .""", _l Ct: 7.(j.Et-~:::: "OaU,.ork It ~J.n.87 n.9 Cc=ti .... hl (;J5t.OLB1 42' U.12 9 13 C) t-.t_ .fe .~ &o1"!!!!!!!!fCt_- -"'.) ~~l~jot~l ~:.:: ..,j i:t: lL 9::-11. «oalholork 11) Ool.24.8:1 91.9 - Il - uS.!jLS7 42 ii.18 a l:::i :.. :; 1 ]4-1)4." Jroa.d.lN'orl: IV (t3. ~;. Eil 9~.:fI; OS.oOl.Sjl 42 '/ .. 48 3 Jl ,..  ~ oill e "'"T i' S }r }E-t t ,'ile. 1Ic... iI:~!i: [on U de t (.oiltract Vd ! N".aIlll4:' of r ,H. t (rat", >01 lD61i11HH £'~ Cal)~to P&r) Oll .. bpoflol'. I ~tQ!j 1,fLQ.9 r f..":;~ kelililrt ~ JjO, LO'[eltlor,~ tvt::.!Jf>flCI': :'l()nHI~ GOIll t Of ;'h'y'. I ~ It • '<T .... t{: • ellt in ;Jl<. .. -~~~ ----- I'l: Ot1oUt?_ ..Ji~~ __ ----~--- w CD cr: CL ::..~..:...... :!s:. ~:j-::!:' .. S} h(#cOhl.{]or ~ ~, v1 .2;: .. 67 1 04. ~ j " (. u jot 1)1.:iJ.~; .,i.e .2.1..34 11.' i'i u:' 27:). 5;;~L9~. it kOiHlllfClr t~ it Ii i)5. {~\). iJ. J !::t. (I IltF'U)~S- ~5 . {~b. ti:l 3b ] i .. 4 ';I IJ 15 ,= PAtlll.H6 :: ~Jt.ventll,."i 29".B~-3:~,l. 48 Roa.dlolol' ~ 51 11[ 01.28.8] LH.4 ~~ . O1.28.IP 4;( 14.48 3 11 ~ l-H. 5(1- n:' .iv i1o"1l1 .. od K J\t (tS.(J] .&} 143.3 .. do - (Io~.()L 8} -t2 14.311) It' '~b J .. Ut) ,"~ ,\.;; "r:;; ~~ ton .(t I OJ.21.S! -48.il N'.El.t.t. i2.n.iir;. ;;(to b• .2~ t~5, 0(1 :,.,,.. ~J 411 :'::'J.rl1ll'1oG .:r'. • :Cili"l.id !> 2Si.~O ,jnd ;!J~jcgesc Oil fi JI (it,n.S? 41L8 - do - 12.26.81 J4 -4( 36".')0 • S41t IP l .. /HI Jirll te 111 e-r. ·'1 :, fn 'If!'r' :,:UtI-> Ii 111 ',I: 0: r jlur ;r :: td'Q,.L,t,.a : I.JI., ~ '.t~r LI :ltl! MadlJ ..:--li-__ 27.~·;;'~ c... (1",O r i ! \ file r .e.:)loIilrd 01 (fHltr",(ts. :011 !ioE'(;Olld cell j 1'5 y~t 54.4 ·c· ",OdOi'O' i. 11 :urllit!'cllfeil, J6 El] ;. 6.., . {'~ br l(lge t.o!::>rr IJI , 2.15.iib 1u.9 U.P.S.iI.C. 12.10.80 :::6.IB 14J ViS. ~112 ..;i. hLt~s IV 2S.n Inch din 11. 01. 67 ~~l. ;W 10 t,5 .iI !'Hi S4H {(UJWCL"" - 6i-lu4 Kc.ttllCltmrt. IJ ut.2S.lV 9'01). (IV J\tlal1U (1-3.11.87 ::}6 b4J.5(1 52 ~2 COj)stI'U(tl~11 ~- 1t14h)-lbl,}i;: li;nil()~(){,l: VI (.~ • 21:1.. oJ I 3/io. "itu - do - 03.J La, ;i.iI :;~.U 24 l::i : .. r f'r ,ji~e .. r. ~- .,I ,----, --- .... '/.:tr drjd;'l i:trllhjlS /j I 190.3 Hll\dust.n -""" tQ~struc:t i Oil ~ Ce. ~ o;t-r 1,.- G 111 ,ilj! b; II 16:;.6 -:v .;... k.:JI~':' i; JJj 2'1.200 ,...... -1 :;. : f1~ I~ r I:i .,c t. ft ( 1(-, .::-;.. Bi 8~. - r~ 'so ?dl'£OIIH~Q lu.15.0-1 -42 c:.:. : ntl=:~ .t J u. 1:'. bi Y2'.CI ~~I~} - j4) •• !:...~J 4:-- ... "7 -::: 11 <I 1'11:;1' I "  ~f,H'" 1".;) I""C t r-J':~.J,9'-' JfI to"' d..::t C... n t r ,il: I! HClllle ot J,j te- of COf'lstn. b: IHUH". ~'~i:£2.!li·!~? r ,i. ".0 a.r k s rlij 110. L..:J.j:IP on~n r, 1100. Sl iJ:l t ell] \,I<il ue Contfd..ctor :OllllJltH1C. - t'l!'rlod 1 1/8~ f"l1v. fll\' :'IH~ ';("I.t ------- j,;'L No l(}~·..~.:..L .._r:~_~.!i -'- ------ w \.!) "'e-st :i!engai a: rfH. '2 ___ , LL :;.. .r(oddWO(1( iJ). L':'. 1;1 f.,.l E. ril. C. C • , d)' 42 i +. '17 is If) ttl HO<ilolrfork Ii 1)1. ~.::.. 87 ]f: .) ... 'j LH~C.C ••~ ... J i 42 B,8S I:;: , to lS- ~., fiOdl.(J'Nort I II U7. i3, B:;r , .J ri.P.LC. i t); ,fI;}I ..2 ~. 4£ Ik C) ::}v-iJ5 hOAIJl,IOr~ LV iJ7.1J..<!H tl" " [ ft:.C.C. t'r.IJo1.ui ~2 n. Q~ tS :z: .j.5-:i'ii lioadflfQrk V t)'1.13 .. :3] :38.; I.H.C.i:.. , 'f. ~) ! . i] l' 42 'I J..,' J1 5':/ -71) f<r.~'1(JwO( k IU 03.lIt.SI 51; :'f. P'. c.r. .3. I)' .tl-;i 42 8:6~ au IS. : 1. "i? f • b ! Uf and V[I u4. 21. iH 18.0 W.p,C.C. ":b.(i2.8' 36- 2 .. 1)7 1 .t 'J ;1 .•:'. ,")0. ') and :. 1~l1;'S 22 1 ROil P~~.eflt~ to r~lJ~d~S. Mort jtJ:s.t aflf.uoed to {olltr.u: t o•. HI. for brHlqe I .--spec t I Oll un. t S onJeol' MHo tleen Pl<iCec.i Oil Jllr.!? 21,. 198.7 on If,. J i ab f; if1i!' .. r<;., ~ Dg)hi. >or fUeD e-QUICl.UH)t bills lu\'e tH;>e!'1 r~celv~d and ~re belng find]lz~d bV a CD~.lttee. BAA estlQatel !r~ ttkel~ to he e~ lh~ to 11:04d ~ah·ty !:qU~~H'!:.'l'It 05ff} c1eal''}ll~e bdSI,~ef1 obt<ilI::,O!d Tor a~ll ! .te_s. Ho~&vcr, ,~rtber p'oqress dep~"deot Dn the ~Jdctl0n o' tarei," ~n. ~ctio~s. by DGS~u. w Ii, fol'" f40ad Us.~r Charlie, do IJe-hl(Il.":](I'et ;t-aJunlzatloOn study, the .odifid H1S-pi!'C .. "~?~rt ~as beeR recelved. co~gestla~ costs and tr~nsportJt.or j~adnds i~r c05tlRi h.5 dlso been recel~ed frCI • i: If)'; IJ I tan t § • 1:1 ~ (:9 Z I 1JI a: :::.::: :z: II ill ........ ..:::. _1 .::;; "l .:.::> ~ .:.\ .;:.. '1:. ..'\)  ItUHA NA1 J{tNAL HJGHWilY PROJ£Cl toO) Loan 253q-3N -o::t W Forecast of Illiarte-r 1:t E~(!ef""h t ure u~to Duarte- r EfU)Jng l:?/B~ ;.!J a: LL Stab ~Grl:'!i F-rOJect PactaiJe Contract Contract N.l~e of iF.atE!' 0; Ct)IIs-tn. [xPJl4ic. ~r ogr a 1'1 af Ex l!e:\'Jodi t lire Hii N.D. Locations (~loflent i~o. Sll)fIolj\9 Vahlf!' Contractor COIIIE'ru::e- fen ad 11/88 Cu ..... 10 »,ate .ent 1" up-to 10 lois. Rs.f'I l10llthL ...Rh!t_ lllii:i ~ bf89 4j'f~' 121:8'9 LlL!:L t=, z Suj.rat iIlH~a [JCl!reulNa:y: 00-"5.1 7 Ie td 12.11.86 113.7 H.ll.C.t.- 4)2.20.81 3l. '5.SO- 5 .. 0 S.C) 25.80 l-t2.95 3 ItS - 1 II 12 .. 10.8.0 J30.2 M.lI.C.C.+ 4>2.13-.67 -42 20.90 li).O 5.0 l5.ij(J V) 0 . ·• '()~45. j u- OB - 2' III 12.11 .. 1l6- b(;.4 N. B.C. c. 01.11.0;;' 36 11 .. J;) ~). 5 5 .. 0 5.0 I 2.5 5.0 l5.l(; .Jnd UP ~ (0 ~5.l-92.a5 11 -do- IV 12.1&.80. 60S. 8 ".!I.C .. C. .36 Jb.S-o {l.S 5 .. 0- 2.5 2.5 S.o J2.3~ O-"5~1 Ap-pro.JC~efi. lUll 07.21.87 47.6 1i.S..C.C. 08.2~.61 36 9.. 15 1.. 5 3.5 2.5 2.5 5. () 24.15 to Q~s lOPe 45.1-'2.B5 - do - llJA il1.12.97 560.1 A• .if" Cc-n5tn. QS.20.&1 36- 8.$b" Z.s 3.5 2.5 2.5 5 .. 0 24.56 .:...... ~ "- . ·~l'. ]t 1 fHlj~ 29.\lJ .B6 ft .... M/s .. Consoli- 2"9.01.88 12 12.41* 2.4 H,8;) ttl dded fl'lund- ati(lns n.-4 II: 9'00 .. 43- 2 R't~s tl 25.' */S4 i1oi'f""- 2\1.01.89 18 2.o.'il-o- 3.4 5.0 t.O 38.90- ..... 1 COI1o,h .. 0--10 RO.l::Mork II Ol.lS.87 J2J.b Conti ne-Btal 05.01.87 57 24.40 J,O Iil'.() 8.0 ~.4) I:I.Q 56-.. '0 .... U~32 - de: - 1,11 03.25.8] 9.8.2 [(lash. ltd. L B.lfour 05.0j.8i 51 lO.14 :i.e- '1.0 '9.u 6.Q 8.5 4tJ.24: Seatty Joi .. t Y.. ntollre J2-4S.1 - .de - VII 03.25 • .87 149.7 - de - \)5 • .01.81 57 2i1 .. 9o. 3.0 9.0 8.0 6.0 b.(P Sa.94) z 45.1 ~59 .. 1 -tiio - VIEI 01 .. 25.87 1H.1 - do - 01..01. 87 51 t8.20 1.4) O.U h.Q ll.20 1=' 5~ .. 1-75 .. 0 - I!;) -- II 03.:ls.a1 t Hl.5 - do - -006.01.87 57 H.Se) 3.0 9.. 0 8.0 4.. 0 .6 .. 5 "8.l0 I- I:!.l z 75.0-92.95 - de - X 05.l)S.87 141. :> - do - (;5.05.61 S7 37.20 ....h.Q. -1& .JhQ .0.0 -L.Q .'.2(1- :x: SuI! Total 262 .. 7tl 25.4 -61. {): 56.5 .§.L.Q .fi.Q ~ U'I a: Haryaoil ::..:~ ;UI·I (): ffJ 51~··14. II ,HtI.adIotClt" It Vt.. 25.87 ~4. -, N.B.C.C. OI.11.B1 42 10.41 1.0 13.0 I Ct. \) 5.4) lS.~ 54.41 .......... CJ ~~I -.l (1:: H~8-9_2 Road ~jClrik JJ t)3.Z:S.87 ./1.' ContineBta I OS. OLin 42 n.12 LQ 13.(1 l(t.O 5.0 15.0 55.11 0 (;ORstn. ~ ~- i.HoIlllr Z\:1 :::.. ..p.., !ie.!lUy Joint .' ""  2 - StatE' WDrks PrOject Packa~~ Cont'~(t Contract tfafle i' DatE' of COflostJl. Elcpndr. PrograG (]of tllpE'nIJJttlr'''' WH ~o. Le~atlo~s Co.ponent ~o. S'gnlnQ Vat ue Contr .'. tor Co •• en~e- Perlod 11/88 Cu ••• w (!J [late .e~t 1n upto II u.. MontHs JiJ;~ 12188 )/8~ bi8"'i1 11189 IViP~ 121B9 92-114 itJ - do - 05.Q1.87 42 J1.7S L5 6.9 12.5 7.S 2~+O ltO.1B lO In 114-130 Roadwork IV 94.S - do - 05-.01.81 42 SuI! Total 252.25-215.53 R04dwork RI 01. 21.a1 104.'1 Inc 0 N 01.27.B7 R JI 05.0.b.91 75..0 ~FC(}HS­ 05.0b.87 30 o PAUU~6 [Jt. Vent 1Jt" jol R ]1) OJ.2a.S7 Ill.4 - do 14.4B 5.9 15.0 12.0 2~.O 22.0 88.48 14~.S~-372.10 RoadNort R IV 05.0J .S7 143.1 - de - 42 14 .. 30 J • .o 1.9 12.9 23.7 1S.7 75.43 2bl.O(; Ino iBridqes on BI OJ.27.87 48.8 0.23 12.23 l'fS.i)O : 9haK'- a :S;rb!nd ::Ci!1~d ~i 4:fU.;)O ,Imd :R~jd9.' on 8 1J - do - 12.2b.~ Jb 20.40 0.5 53.410- 36>4,;I}(I \:i,dhj ilitd IWhite Btu ;pU lien :. J fWlhi t j [ t Indla.n Hl",s" 11.80. 11.8(10 ,l.l': 'S/\e!"'put : U-~t CUIM,"I". I :'::JJiit:l'lltru 51i~ Total h.ll N~dl.l 1111,'5 27.8-5".4 Rc:ud""od: 3.55 U.5 J]~5 17.5 51.65 54 ... -601.0 f(oadlll(~rf,: O.Si i 2.:5 12 • 5 15. ~ 4(1.38 6.7.00 III l2. 1:). 86. U.P.S,B.~. 12.16.86 ::So 26.88 (j.t. 2.9 3.4 3.5 37.28 vrs; ~51n 25.72 Indian 21.01.87 l2.20 3. .. 3. 35.50 ,ulld 5H4 ft. 1 hay vl.La.Ei7 96.(uJo Allant. 03.11.87 1.5 7.3 7.. .b.S CDllstruct ll~n " 61. 2B, 87 - do - ('1,3..JI.8]  1<: f "'~idct C.o11trd{t ~,ltlle- !:'It ~'<I te at '::~nstn. " ;Hilq lidllJe Con trilctoi t:O.:tIH'[l(.f'- Perlod (liil••• ••~i"l t :. ujJ Lll >,L --~<;~--- ~ .. -.-.. -.~-.~-- ----_.. ,:~):~";) __ J"'. 12/8:;' ':. { ~ Jli, Pr Ii C Ii! S~. r~!i.!_L ______ Lf) tf.! V,3r.l..n~Sl E! I 1'1'0, J. Htndusl,) l ';.1.Lihl "*8 5.45 1-1.6- 6,~ 5. ,) , 1 , ;:3:.5 flrluqe Cr.;nstn. (v, h.lrg. EI t( 163.6 ,- R(l9s S III 29.2 li.U. 5.45 14.9 HI'. i,) 10.0 6.1) • • ) I)-iS. Ul.pll'f'Oolch R ) l (I. is. it 8J.3 M ... Rf!'{,QitoO P).1~.g7 u 9.n 0.3 ... 5 3~O 7.5 '4. :) Jb •• i'-H.o5 :Rod.-o ~Drk R If J. i). t~. U/ n.~ - do - l4.l.15.al .2 1:2.95 3. i 4.1) S.O 2.5 ..].5 3:' 1 t) Sui) Total 4[.75 14.3 18. (10 33.5 2Q.5o 22. S l500.5 ::!>t fi:t!'fllJd: 1 1!t~ __ 5-JO Roadwork 1 (ll.ll.S' 82.1 loR.G .. £'. (;, • .,P[.8] 42 14.97 LO 6.5 1£1.0 7.5 10.1) 4lt.'1 J(,!-j:€l RG<IIdllfot.k II 01.13.87 75.2 "R.C.C. 6'9'.!H .. 87 42 8.83 1 .. 0- G.Q iO.O 1 .. 0 1.0 3'.83 la-lO ROoid1llcrt [II {)7.lJ.87 13.5 ~ .. P.C~t. '.'9.0J .. 87 -42 C),42 £1 .. 5 +.5 0.0 S.O •• (10 12.42 3i)-.5 RoadlllQrt IV 1,13.97 82.2 1.R .. t • .c. 09.IH.£l) 42 ( t. (}4 0.5 6.5 12.S 1.5 1(L 0 48 .. 04 45-5'( f;ioadllfork 'J ·)].13.81 88.' I.R.C.C. Q'9.j)1.B7 12 9.1'9 lot) 7.0 12.5 1.5 W .. U 4J.n :59- JII fuaditork \Ii Ol.Ol. tl} 5~.b H.P.C.C. OJ .. Q1. S'] ~~ 42 S.U 1.2 9.0 9.0 4.S ",5 10.84 7 21.', 27.6 I UP d6d ;u (1-4.21.81 18.6 N.. P.C.C. 06 .. 02.87 l6 2.07 2.13 5 .. 5 '3.0 1.4) 2.5 16.87 :).1,0, 66.! a ,'qj J i'!!fi 1 flDB 1.2H 9.24 ~!!.b. Total n.o 1hQ. 45~ 0_ 6.1?L1.. 4'1).0 50.0_ 28.1 ~b!~ ba~.o5 89.8 255,8 2'~6 .. J 28().1 .3n.7 I «i2'S. 1 ~A~L~LIct.a1 jp--.!!?$ Hi 1 H on "5.18 S.'¥' 17. t 19:.7 18.7 21.1 129.6 ,r1 ------- ~.~ ..--. --~.~" ------.. ...... ~---------. ~ De~o~it ~lt~ ~ •• j~4yS A CORtract ta be teralA4ted anc rea~~rded t A~&ro decs~lo~ t~1 re~of~~ ~nt under revlew fl•• For .')1'''' d~~ , ,hp n,~5 io,t"~n tL !!lied 0"' JUI1>1!' :2, l 'f<it;' 01, ,$r',';iJ\).\S! Fl1i.ju:IE<Eirs.1 !4e~ Ilein •• Fal" kl.:SI f'tlUl.pu~nt Iuds iu ... 1!' be-en re(~ .... eD =~. ,tte~. f~e ~~~ @~ laates ~rel~ei be e.cee4~6. For ~oad Saietv equlp~e6( 06fD clearancE h~~ b~en oblalne. for t\j: ~fl" illr' l~ ;1(. wnl t t?s. Jyr~S5 ~~~en~.~ Q~ t~e s~nct "r qn 1!!"1((lJ,a,,,~\~ olifiiJ, ,:;Ct.OIl5 0)' liG5/tD. ,,~ ':'''l' ~r r~port h~s been recelve~. The approath paper 00 urban • l~e consultants.  NO.55 PRGE 21 . " Id ED.' 1 :;:' • '2 1 • ' S ::: 1 '3: 1 E; FROM WORLD8RNK WRSHINGTON ," ~,' , 202 477 5391 p,e3__ I .... ; f't . . . . _ WI! , J I I I =: .. - ~ , :E 2: m i 0 ::: .... ~ ~ ',N .... ..,- w- .~N- I~r I f'l (Hi. i e-: !IJi f'I! i- f 'Ii If, .{ifi . I , --- ! " ,',.".' I~i, . ,.- )$'!." ~l I ~~ .~, ....... ~ '$ . ' t;i~ "'I"'~ ~. ~~ il ~l· ~ ~( ... Sit 8 • * il f! 1 , ~fii (I fjll fj. [. » ! .. ~( ~ 11a a' ~> S'i ., ~I l!i ~( )-!i II i~ t: :J.O £ ~2'Sd Z xauuv , . .... -.,I • • . !<feotl ~ I