Investing for a safe and healthy Georgia: WHO Health Emergencies Programme at the country level

UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 E-mail: euwhocontact@who.int Website: www.euro.who.int The WHO Reg The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health matters each with its own programme geared to the particular health conditions of the countries it serves. Member States Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czechia Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan The former Yugoslav R public of Macedoniaurkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom Uzbekistan North Macedonia Investing for a safe and healthy Georgia WHO Health Emergencies Programme at the country level Investing for a safe and healthy Georgia © World Health Organization 2019 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the nam es of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. The views expressed by authors, editors, or expert groups do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the World Health Organization. Design and layout: Djordje Novakovic 5WHO Health Emergencies Programme at the country level Disasters and emergencies disrupt communities and destroy livelihoods – most of all they threaten people’s health. In a typical year, Europe suffers economic losses of € 10 billion from disasters and emergencies,1 which result in hundreds of people dying or becoming severely ill. Europe’s 21st century emergencies include a wide range of hazards: • Many countries have measles epidemics. • Countries in southern, central and eastern parts of the Region have outbreaks of vector-borne diseases, such as West Nile Virus and Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever. • All national health systems in the European Region have to respond to outbreaks of foodborne diseases, and antimicrobial resistance is growing at an unprecedented pace. • Many countries are prone to floods, heatwaves, forest fires and other extreme events. Climate change means Europe is likely to see many more such emergencies in the coming years. • The threat of earthquakes and other natural disasters in Europe – possibly combined with chemical or nuclear contamination – never goes away. • Conflicts and terrorist attacks affect European countries directly and as spill-over effects from neighbouring countries and regions. 1 Estimate quoted in EFDRR. High-Level Dialogue Communiqué from 2017. European Forum for Disaster Risk Reduction, Istanbul, 26–28 March 2017. Geneva: European Forum for Disaster Risk Reduction; 2017. (https://www.preventionweb.net/files/52533_2017efdrrhlcommuniquefinal.pdf, accessed 23 August 2019). 6 7 The European Region is part of a highly interconnected world. Diseases can spread at the speed of an aeroplane, and people fleeing emergencies often cross international frontiers. Recent striking examples of international emergencies with repercussions in Europe are the outbreaks of the Ebola and Zika viruses, and the Syrian humanitarian crisis. Georgia: The case for action Georgia’s most recent health risk assessment identified earthquake hazards, foodborne and waterborne diarrhoeal diseases, measles and seasonal influenza as high priority risks. This relates to the inevitability of their occurrence, their transmission potential, the high rates of fatalities, matched with the coping capacity to manage these events. Floods, wildfires, water reservoir collapse incidents, conflict, outbreaks of extremely dangerous pathogens, such as Brucella, Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever, Botulinum toxin and pandemic influenza, were considered as moderate priority events, although vulnerabilities and coping capacities to manage these events vary widely. The WHO Health Emergencies (WHE) Programme will continue to scale up support to priority countries and territories to help them to strengthen their International Health Regulations (IHR) core capacities. Each of the priority countries faces significant hazards, and each has vulnerabilities in their health emergency response capacities. This means health emergencies can have a high impact in these countries and territories. It also means they are the places in the Region where investment in IHR core capacities can produce the greatest return. 1 1 BOX MAP Key emergency threats in Georgia • Earthquake and flood hazards (Maps 1 and 2) • Foodborne and waterborne outbreaks, measles and seasonal influenza • Fires • Conflict and political unrest Map 1: Georgia: Seismic hazard map2 2 WHO. The WHO E-Atlas of Disaster Risk for the European Region. Volume 1. Exposure to Natural Hazards. Version 2.0. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2011. (http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/ emergencies/disaster-preparedness-and-response/publications/2011/who-e-atlas-of-disaster-risk-for- the-european-region-the.-volume-1.-exposure-to-natural-hazards.-version-2.0, accessed 23 August 2019). Country Emergency Preparedness Programme in the European Region: alert@euro.who.int Further information e-atlas: vram@who.int Disclaimer The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to produce this map. However this map is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied regarding its content. The responsibility for its interpretation and use lies with the user. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. © WHO 2010. All rights reserved. 0 150 30075 Km Projection: Geographic Geographic coordinate system : WGS 84 Georgia: Seismic Hazard Distribution Map Significant earthquakes 2150 B.C. to 2010 0,1 - 1,9 (Unfelt) 2,0 - 2,9 (Very minor) 3,0 - 3,9 (Minor) 4,0 - 4,9 (Light) 5,0 - 5,9 (Moderate) 6,0 - 6,9 (Strong) 7,0 - 7,9 (Very strong) Legend Major cities (Geonames, 2010) International boundaries Very low Low Medium High Very high No data (0 - 0.2) (0.2 - 0.8) (0.8 - 2.4) (2.4 - 4) ( >4) Plate boundaries (NOAA, 1998) Significant volcanic eruptions 435 B.C. to 2010 (NOAA, 2010) (NOAA, 2010) Richter scale magnitude >8,8 (Catastrophic) 0,0 or Unknown (before instrumentation) Seismic hazard (PGA, m/s )2 (Modified from Giardini et al. 1999) (United Nations, 2010) Disclaimer The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to produce this map. However this map is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied regarding its content. The responsibility for its interpretation and use lies with the user. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. © WHO 2010. All rights reserved. Legend Seismic hazard (PGA, m/s2) (Modified from Giardini et al. 1999) Very low (0 - 0.2) Low (0.2 - 0.8) Medium (0.8 - 2.4) High (2.4 - 4) Very high ( >4) No data Significant earthquakes 2150 B.C. to 2010 (NOAA, 2010) Richter scale magnitude 0,0 or Unkonown 0,1 - 1,9 (Unfelt) 2,0 - 2,9 (Very minor) 3,0 - 3,9 (Minor) 4,0 - 4,9 (Light) 5,0 - 5,9 (Moderate) 6,0 - 6,9 (Strong) 7,0 - 7,9 (Very strong) >8,8 (Catastrophic) (before instrumentation) 8 9 2 MAP Country Emergency Preparedness Programme in the European Region: alert@euro.who.int Further information e-atlas: vram@who.int Disclaimer The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to produce this map. However this map is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied regarding its content. The responsibility for its interpretation and use lies with the user. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. © WHO 2010. All rights reserved. 0 150 30075 Km Projection: Geographic Geographic coordinate system : WGS 84 Georgia: Flood Hazard Distribution Map Legend Flood hazard (index) (World Health Organization, 2010) International boundaries (United Nations, 2010) Major cities (Geonames, 2010) No data Very low Low Medium High Very high (0 - 122) (123 - 350) (351 - 628) (629 - 1073) (1074 - 3764) Georgia: Flood hazard map3 Georgia is striving to achieve Universal health coverage (UHC), in line with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Investing in health emergency capacities supports the country’s progress towards these and other SDGs. The investment will safeguard social and economic progress, by reducing the impact of emergencies when they happen. 3 Ibid. “Universal health coverage and health emergencies are two sides of the same coin” Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Director-General of World Health Organization Universal health coverage and health emergency capacity, or emergency preparedness, are two sides of the same coin in a people-centred health system. When countries strengthen their emergency preparedness and response capacities, they also strengthen their health system’s ability to provide universal health coverage. In the same way, when countries strengthen their health systems, they strengthen their capacity to be prepared for and respond to emergencies. True universal health coverage means people can access quality, affordable, safe and culturally sensitive life-saving services when they need them most – including when they have been hit by an emergency. Disclaimer The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to produce this map. However this map is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied regarding its content. The responsibility for its interpretation and use lies with the user. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. © WHO 2010. All rights reserved. Legend Flood hazard (index) (World Health Organization, 2010) Very low (0 - 0.2) Low (0.2 - 0.8) Medium (0.8 - 2.4) High (2.4 - 4) Very high ( >4) N data Natural disaster such as landslide have the potential to increase public health risks Photo credit: WHO 10 11 2 BOX Investing in emergency preparedness makes economic sense Many health emergencies are partly or fully preventable. Where they are not, harm can often be reduced through prevention, preparedness, early detection and rapid response. Total global investment required over the coming five years to effectively prepare for, prevent, detect and respond to health emergencies is estimated at US$  28.9 billion. Success will be measured against the goal of better protecting at least 1 billion more people from health emergencies and providing life-saving health services to 100 million vulnerable people. It will save approximately 1.5 million lives and provide estimated economic gains of US$ 240 billion. Extract from A Healthier Humanity: The WHO Investment Case for 2019–20234 The return on investment is US$ 8.30 for every US$ 1 provided – a more than eightfold return. The investment pays back in multiple ways: • it saves people, society, economy from the next emergency • it strengthens the health system • it helps to meet several Sustainable Development Goals • it contributes to global efforts to protect 1 billion more people worldwide. 4 WHO. A Healthier Humanity: The WHO Investment Case for 2019–2023, pp. 24–28. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/274710/WHO-DGO-CRM-18.2- eng.pdf, accessed 23 August 2019). 3 BOX Investing in health emergency preparedness is key to achieving the SGDs Investing in health emergency preparedness and response is key to achieving SDG 3 “Ensuring healthy lives and promoting the well- being at all ages is essential to sustainable development”. It is particularly relevant to target 3.D, which deals with strengthening health emergency capacity, and targets 3.1 (maternal mortality); 3.2 (infant mortality); 3.8 (universal health coverage) and 3.9 (deaths from chemical contamination). Investment in health emergency capacity also plays an important role in achieving other SDG goals such as: eliminating poverty and hunger (SDG 1, SDG 2); gender equality (SDG 5); decent work and economic growth (SDG 8); reduced inequalities (SDG 10); Climate Change (SDG 13); and Peace, justice and strong institutions (SDG 16). 12 13 4 BOX The International Health Regulations: a framework to protect people from health emergencies Since 2007, the IHR have made a difference to the way the world prepares for and responds to emergencies. The IHR (2005) is a central mechanism within the WHE Programme to guide countries towards achieving common approaches and capacities to detect, assess and respond to health threats. The IHR (2005) is a legally binding treaty signed by all WHO Member States. What it commits them to is: 1. Sharing information with WHO, and each other, about all hazards – disease outbreaks and other health threats (e.g. chemical or nuclear contamination) – that could spread across international borders. 2. Developing and maintaining the core capacities needed to prepare for, detect and respond to disease outbreaks, and other health threats. 3. Reporting annually on their implementation of the IHR. The IHR have already strengthened international cooperation and country capacities to deal with health emergencies. Nonetheless, many Member States in the European Region, and indeed around the world, have scope to further strengthen their IHR core capacities. For more information about the IHR see: https://www.who.int/topics/international_health_regulations/en/ 5 BOX IHR core capacities for monitoring and evaluation 1. Legislation and Financing 2. IHR coordination and national IHR focal point functions 3. Zoonotic events and the human–animal interface 4. Food safety 5. Laboratory 6. Surveillance 7. Human resources 8. National Health Emergency Framework 9. Health Service Provision 10. Risk communication 11. Points of entry 12. Chemical events 13. Radiation emergencies 14 15 6 BOX Georgia emergency preparedness and response capacities Overview of IHR monitoring and evaluation in Georgia Four complementary components of monitoring and evaluation help to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of IHR country capacities.5 The States Parties Annual Reporting is mandatory; the Joint External Evaluation (JEE), After Action Reviews (AARs) and Simulation exercises are voluntary. In particular the JEE fosters a peer-to-peer discussion between international and national experts to identify strengths and weaknesses in emergency preparedness and response within the national health system. Results and recommendations from these activities are the basis for the development of a National Action Plan for Health Emergency Preparedness. Done or in process: • States Parties Annual Reporting: 2019 • Joint External Evaluation: 2019 • After Action Review: 2019 Recommended: • Simulation exercise • National Action Plan for Health Emergency Preparedness 5 WHO. IHR Monitoring and Evaluation: A Key Element for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; Europe; 2018 (http://www.euro.who.int/__data/ assets/pdf_file/0006/375819/IHR-Brief_WEB.pdf?ua=1, accessed 23 August 2019). 7 BOX Highlights from Georgia’s 2019 self-assessment report on its IHR core capacities6 Analysis of Georgia’s annual reporting data for 2019 shows the IHR core capacities with most room for improvement in Georgia are currently: • Risk Communication • Chemical Events • Points of entry • Radiation emergencies 6 WHO. Strengthening health security by implementing the International Health Regulations [online]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2005. (https://www.who.int/ihr/procedures/mission- reports-europe/en/, accessed 2 September 2019). Participants learn techniques on detection and characterization on training workshop in Tbilisi, April 2017. Photo credit: WHO 16 17 8 BOX Key findings from Joint External Evaluation of Georgia’s IHR core capacities Overarching recommendations: • Increase support for IHR (2005) at the highest government levels. • Enhance collaboration among sectors through a cross- sectoral programme defining systems and procedures in “peacetime” and ensuring their effective operationalization, through information sharing and joint training and simulation exercises. • Build cooperation and communication between public and private sectors via the cross-sectoral programme. Strongest areas in Georgia’s public health system: • Immunization • National laboratory system • Surveillance. Key areas for intervention: • Antimicrobial resistance, particularly optimizing the use of antibiotics in animal health. • Risk communication, particularly improving community engagement and rumour management. • Points of entry, particularly creating a Multisectoral Public Health Emergency Contingency Plan and implementing vector control programmes and sanitary measures. Georgia’s health emergency preparedness initiatives Emergency operations plan Georgia is in the process of revising its National Emergency Response Plan with WHO’s support. Strategic risk assessment Earthquakes, foodborne and waterborne diseases, measles and influenza were identified as high priority risks during the March 2019 strategic risk assessment. Hospital safety Natural disasters are a major hazard for Georgia. An assessment of 112 major hospitals was conducted for structural and non-structural safety and functional capacity during disasters. The results of this assessment are published at http://www.euro.who.int/en/countries/georgia/publications/evaluation-of- hospital-safety-in-georgia-summary-report,-tbilisi-2018 Infection prevention and control (IPC) According to the 2018 Global Monitoring of Country Progress on Antimicrobial Resistance in Georgia, a National IPC programme is available. It is in accord with WHO’s IPC core components guidelines, and Georgia’s IPC plans and guidelines are implemented nationwide. WHO is supporting the development of a training curriculum for nurses, doctors and hospital administrators. 18 19 Risk communication The Regional Office has launched an Emergency risk communication (ERC) five- step package7 for tailored support to each enrolled country to scale up their capacity in this area, by developing, testing and adopting their ERC national plan under the IHR. Georgia completed steps 1 to 3 of the ERC capacity-building package including training, capacity mapping and plan writing and participated in the social science training in December 2018. Opportunities for further progress Georgia’s Ministry of Health is showing political commitment and leadership on health emergency capacities. In the context of implementing the IHR (Box 4), it has volunteered Georgia to undergo a JEE of its health emergency core capacities. The process of preparing for, and then going through, a JEE gave the Ministry of Health and its partners a clearer insight into Georgia’s current level of health emergency response capacity. It also gave them recommendations from international experts on where and how these capacities need to be strengthened – including three or four top priority recommendations for action. The JEE report and its recommendations provide a basis for Georgia to develop a National Action Plan for Health Emergency Preparedness. This sets out a multi-year plan for strengthening IHR core capacities, and provide the resources needed to keep them sustainable and robust in the long term. 7 WHO. Emergency risk communication (ERC) 5-step capacity-building package [online]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. (http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/emergencies/international- health-regulations/emergency-risk-communications/emergency-risk-communications-tools/national- health-emergency-risk-communication-training-package, accessed 23 August 2019). Once the National Action Plan is in place and being implemented, there is a clear strategy supported by domestic resources. WHO and international partners will then be in a good position to identify areas where they can offer technical support or additional resources for strengthening IHR core capacities in Georgia. Success stories Upgrading emergency operation centre The Ministry of Health in Georgia recently upgraded its Emergency Operation Centre (EOC) with WHO’s technical assistance on structure and protocols. In collaboration with WHO, the Ministry of Health has: • evaluated the safety of more than 100 hospitals • been building capacity on Emergency risk communication • been implementing IPC plans and guidance nationwide. Georgia: the hub for the Caucasus Georgia is the hub for the Caucasus of WHE Programme. WHO’s Country Office, the hub and partners organize regular training and emergency simulation exercises to help Georgia and neighbouring countries maintain and further strengthen their capacities. 20 21 1. Prevention and control of infectious diseases – through vaccination, for example – help prevent outbreaks in the first place. 2. At the same time, countries need to develop, test and evaluate their national plans and strengthen their capacities to be prepared for the next emergency of any type. This includes, for example, assessing hospitals for safety and functionality, establishing a laboratory network of excellence, setting up systems for disease surveillance, and engaging communities to communicate risks. 3. During the response, life-saving health interventions and pre-positioned essential health packages are delivered in collaboration with health partners to ensure that affected populations have timely access to quality health services, leaving no one behind. 4. The recovery phase is the time to learn from experience and build back better; it is the opportunity to make health systems stronger for the future. Bridging health emergencies and universal health coverage – two sides of the same coin – will pave the way for countries to achieve the related Sustainable Development Goals. To make this a reality, the WHE Programme has tailored the global strategy into a European Action Plan. The Plan bonds countries with comparable levels of capacity and capability to avert or respond to emergencies. This requires cooperation across sectors and across borders. As a strong believer in partnership, WHO invites all governments, sectors, partners and people in the European Region to implement the Action Plan jointly. Together we have the expertise and know-how, and together we can support global efforts to prevent, prepare for, respond to and recover from all health emergencies, while contributing to protecting 1 billion more people worldwide. Protecting people from health emergencies together: The way W(H)E work The WHE Programme is providing the Organization’s response to increasingly demanding crises. Mainstreamed across all levels of the Organization, it is geared to better protect people from health emergencies by establishing people- centred health systems which can detect, assess, communicate and respond to crises in a matter of hours. Since each country is unique, the Programme tailors its support to countries’ specific hazards, vulnerabilities and systems. It recognizes that structures and people with the right skills need to be in place where disease outbreaks occur, where disasters and conflicts strike, and where people fall sick and die. Therefore the Programme places countries at its centre. The health emergency management cycle defines the rhythm of the Programme. Its four phases – prevention, preparedness, response and recovery – are grounded in the requirements of the IHR and seamlessly complement each other to save lives. Here’s how it works: 22 UN City, Marmorvej 51, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 E-mail: euwhocontact@who.int Website: www.euro.who.int The WHO Reg The World Health Organization (WHO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations created in 1948 with the primary responsibility for international health matters each with its own programme geared to the particular health conditions of the countries it serves. Member States Albania Andorra Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czechia Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tajikistan The former Yugoslav R public of Macedoniaurkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom Uzbekistan North Macedonia Investing for a safe and healthy Georgia WHO Health Emergencies Programme at the country level