World Health Organization (WHO) · Technical Documents

The mouse neutralization (protection) test for yellow fever

World Health Organization
View original document

The full text is hosted by the publishing organisation. lawenc.com indexes the metadata and links to the official source.

Full text

WORLD H E /\ L T H O RGA N IZ ^ I O N M

ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTÉ V ,TI 0/ YFV /13

EXPEET CŒvMITTEE ON YELLOW F F ; S E VACCINE

'^2 M Geneva 8-13 A p r i l 1937 Provisiong.1 -^.p^enda item 7

19 ï-ferch 1957 »

ORIGINAL;

ENGLEH

THE MOUSE NEUTRALIZATION (EROTECTION) TEST FOR YELLOW FEVEE by Dr F . N . Macnamara I. A standard Test

Standardization of the yellow fever neutralization test would have the great advantage that the results from d i f f e r e n t laboratories would be more nearly comparable than they are now. Nevertheless, i t i s unlikely that early agreement The introduction of a universal standard on a standard technique can be reached.

technique moreover might also bring with i t the disadvantage that laboratories might not seel: to improve on the test and conduct research on i t s application, It wxiiuld seem advisable therefore at the present to allow laboratcrries to conduct neutralization tests according to the methods i n which they are most suited and experienced. The most important consideration, however, i s that i t should be possiblj to evaluate the results of one laboratory i n terms of those of another. For t h i s purpose i t i s essential that a laboratory should be able to compare the method of i t s choice with some "standard", and f o r t h i s reason, i f f o r no other, i t i s suggested that a standard neutralization test should be evolved. they should be those which produce the least experimental v a r i a t i o n . as w e l l as a standard "non-immune" serum and a standard v i r u s . If about 200 sera, of which about one half should be positive and one half negative, were tested i n p a r a l l e l i n the two tests a good indication would be given of the s e n s i t i v i t y f o r use i n surveys of the peculiar method of the laboratory compared with the standard t e s t . The methods The controls and materials of the standard test should be l a i d down i n the greatest d e t a i l and used i n the test should be r i g i d , and a standard immune serum should be available,

WH0/ïFV/l5 page 2

I f , however, the antibody t i t r e s of sera were t o be evaluated, c o n s i d e r a b l y more work would need t o be done. For instance, i t would be necessary t o show t h a t i n since

t e s t s u s i n g d i f f e r e n t methods the same an'.ibodies were i n f a c t being measured; 2 5 there i s evidence t h a t t h i s may not always be the case, ' F o r t h i s purpose i t

would be necessary t o prepare standard sera c o n t a i n i n g d i f f e r i n g q u a n t i t i e s of the various antibodies, Since i t i s d i f f i c u l t t o predetermine the exact challenge dose mixed w i t h the t e s t serum, even i n t e s t s conducted on e x a c t l y s i m i l a r l i n e s , i t i s necessary t o know Therefore f o r each d i f f e r e n t

the f u n c t i o n r e l a t i n g v i r u s dose and antibody t i t r e .

method the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of the curve v i r u s dose-antibody t i t r e should be deterrained. The amount of v i r u s added t o the serum can only be determined by t i t r a t i n g the amount of v i r u s which i s v i a b l e under the c o n d i t i o n s of the t e s t . For t h i s purpose

I t i s necessary t o add the v i r u s to a "non-imnune" serum and t i t r a t e the v i r u s a f t e r i t has been subjected t o the c o n d i t i o n s of the t e s t . Therefore a standard

"non-immune" serum must be used and be a v a i l a b l e t o a l l l a b o r a t o r i e s . S t a n d a r d i z a t i o n of the v i r u s w i t h r e ^ r d t o s t r a i n , passage l e v e l , and i n terns of mouse LD^^ would be r e l a t i v e l y easy. d i f f i c u l t t o determine What, however, would be potency extremely

i s the amount of non-viable v i r u s present;

and there i s a t

present v e r y l i t t l e known of the e f f e c t of t h i s non-viable v i r u s on the behaviour of a neutralization test. C o n s i d e r a t i o n of the presence of non-viable v i r u s ,

however, shoxald not be ignored when i t i s r e a l i z e d t h a t any standard v i r u s p r e p a r a t i o n wovild almost of n e c e s s i t y have t o be a f r e e z e - d r i e d product, and t h a t i n f r e e z e - d r y i n g about 90 per c e n t , of the l i v e v i r u s i s destroyed. With standard immune s e r a , "non-immune" s e r a , and v i r u s , i t would be p o s s i b l e t o evaluate other v a r i a b l e s such as those of the white n i c e and the s k i l l of the 12 operators as have heen described by Smithburn, In making suggestions f o r standard t e s t s , sera., and v i r u s , i t i s not thereby recommended t h a t standards should n e c e s s a r i l y be developed i n that order, Use of

V7H0/YFV/15 page 5

any s t a n d a r d m a t e r i a l or method i s l i k e l y t o r e s u l t

i n the

subsequent s t a n d a r d s b e i n g Therefore i t is this

o f a h i g h e r q u a l i t y t h a n i f t h e y t h e m s e l v e s had been u s e d f i r s t . l a r g e l y a m a t t e r of c h o i c e v h i c h s t a n d a r d consideration.

i s f i r s t d e v e l o p e d h a v i n g due r e g a r d t o

I n d e s c r i b i n g the d e t a i l s o f a n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t t h e f o l l o w i n g p o i n t s l i s t e d as w o r t h y o f 1. 2. attention: serum samples Poriod. Temperature.

are

I n a c t i v a t i o n o f the Nature of d i l u t i o n

10^ non-immune monkey serum 1 0 5 ^ " 1 0 5 & " 1 0 5 ^ " 10^ o t h e r " " " serum concentration? human rabbit horse "

I s 10^ the c o r r e c t

0.2^/ 0.75^ and ?^ b o v i n e a l b u m i n E x c i p i e n t - Sodium c h l o r i d e Buffered saline A d d i t i o n o f f r e s h non-immune serum c o n t a i n i n g complement o r complement-like 5» Virus Strain, Prepared f r o m : substances level.

0.8^, 0.85^, 0.9^

Passage

mouse b r a i n , c h i c k embryo

Method o f t r i t u r a t i o n , n a t u r e and q u a n t i t y o f e x c i p i e n t Centrifugation: Filtration D e t a i l s of d e s i c c a t i o n Storage Method o f r e h y d r a t i n g d e s i c c a t e d v i r u s D u r a t i o n between r e h y d r a t i o n and use p e r i o d and g r a v i t a t i o n constant

WHO/YFV /15

page k

h.

Serum-virua mixtures Mouse LD50 o f v i r u s added Proportion o f volumes of serum and virus-preparation of the serum-virus mixtures

Time and t e m p e r a t u r e o f i n c u b a t i o n before inoculation 5« 6. Mice S t r a i n , age, r a n d o m i z a t i o n

Inoculation Anaesthetic Dose o f i n o c u l u m Route of i n o c u l a t i o n Size of needle

Intracerebral starching; n a t u r e , dose, and time i n t e r v a l b e f o r e / a f t e r intra-peritoneal inoculation 7. Controls T i t r e of the v i r u s i n the t e s t determined (a) b y d i l u t i n g t h e t e s t v i r u s i n t h e "non-imniune" serum and i n o c u l a t i n g a f t e r incubation;

before incubation (b)

b y t i t r a t i n g v i r u s r e m a i n i n g i n t h e "non-immune" s e r u m - v i r u s incubation;

mixture a f t e r (c)

b y t i t r a t i n g immixed v i r u s w h i c h has s t o o d w i t h t h e t e s t

Number o f non>-immune c o n t r o l s T i t r e o f immune serum c o n t r o l (a) (b) d i l u t i o n o f serum w i t h v i r u s h e l d d i l u t i o n of v i r u s w i t h serum h e l d constant; constant.

Numbers o f mice i n o c u l a t e d 8.

p e r d i l u t i o n , and d i l u t i o n I n t e r v a l s

P e r i o d ^f._obsg.^X^AiOP—Q^L jPAee.

vrao/ïFv/i5 page 5

9,

Evaluation

of r e s u l t s deaths/illnesses average s u r v i v a l times; Sven Gard's 1; T

Decision on non-specific

Sickness r a t e ; m o r t a l i t y r a t e j n e u t r a l i z a t i o n index

II. o

Use of the mouse n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t i n diafyiosis

Sabin'' showed by complement f i x a t i o n t e s t s that y e l l o v fever v i r u s was L o g i c a l l y r e l a t e d t o dengue, West N i l e , and Japanese B v i r u s .

sero.-

P r e v i o u s l y Smithburn^^

had shown that West N i l e , Japanese B and St Louis e n c e p h a l i t i s were s e r o l o g i c a l l y related i n protection tests. More r e c e n t l y i t has been shown by techniques i n v o l v i n g

haemagglutination i n h i b i t i o n ^ t h a t y e l l o w fever v i r u s i s a member of a group of v i r u s e s now u s u a l l y known as the Group B arthropod-borne v i r u s e s . The relationships

have been demonstrated on the whole by t e s t s other than the p r o t e c t i o n t e s t which i s the most s p e c i f i c of them a l l . Macnamara showed by n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t s the 15 s e r o l o g i c a l r e l a t i o n s h i p between y e l l o w fever and Uganda 3 v i r u s e s , and Smithburn

7 showed s i m i l a r r e l a t i o n s h i p s w i t h other v i r u s e s while P o r t e r f i e l d was able t o show

a s l i g h t p r o t e c t i o n against y e l l o w fever v i r u s of the serxun of a rhosus monkey which had been i n j e c t e d w i t h West N i l e v i r u s . weak and one-sided. The The r e l a t i o n s h i p s vere f o r the most part

r e s u l t s , moreover, of n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t s on sera c o l l e c t e d of sera g i v i n g a

from widespread regions of the globe i n d i c a t e that the proportion

p o s i t i v e y e l l o v fever n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t r e s u l t i n g from s e r o l o g i c a l c r o s s - r e l a t i o n s h i p i s very s m a l l . Nevertheless i n West A f r i c a , where there i s probably as h i g h an B arthropod-borne v i r u s e s as anywhere, i t has been suggested that or more v i r u s e s of the group may r e s u l t i n the sera

incidence of Group

repeated i n f e c t i o n s w i t h one

becoming p o s i t i v e t o other v i r u s e s of the group although a c t i o n i n f e c t i o n may not . have occurred. That t h i s can occur w i t h haemagglutination t e s t s i s already known.

Staithburn"'"^ has demonstrated a s i m i l a r phenomenon u s i n g the n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t . o Porterfield has produced some c i r c u m s t a n t i a l though not conclusive grounds; evidence on

epidemiological

and a n a l y s i s of a survey of the sera from a v i l l a g e i n

N i g e r i a has shown s l i g h t c o r r e l a t i o n between sera g i v i n g p o s i t i v e r e s u l t s i n

6 n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t s employed on Group B v i r u s e s .

vmoAFv/13 page 6 l'Tiat i s probably a more serious problem and one more d i f f i c u l t t o r e s o l v e i s that of the r i s e i n y e l l o w fever antibody t i t r e i n a person already immune t o y e l l o w fever as a r e s u l t of i n f e c t i o n w i t h another group B v i r u s , Bearcroft has shown a

r i s e i n t i t r e of over 400 timfôîfollowing i n f e c t i o n v i t h Zika v i r u s , and Schlesinger et a l , " ^ ^ have shown a r i s e f o l l o w i n g dengue v a c c i n a t i o n , VJith t h i s knowledge i t i s a rise

now no longer advisable t o diagnose a case of yellow fever by demonstrating i n antibody t i t r e unless the i n i t i a l or acute phase serum i s completely

negative.

The r i s e i n t i t r e of the serum samples against the homologous v i r u s may be c o n s i d e r a b l y l e s s than that against y e l l o w f e v e r , so that n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t s using other v i r u s e s may not neces-rarily i n d i c a t e the r e a l cause of the i n f e c t i o n . As a c o r o l l a r y i t should be noted t h a t i n f e c t i o n w i t h yellow fever v i r u s i n man has been shown t o r a i s e considerably i n a n e u t r a l i z a t i o n t e s t the serum t i t r e a g a i n s t Uganda S v i r u s , ^ Such a r i s e does not, however, p e r s i s t , and the t i t r e f a l l s

g r a d u a l l y from a peak about three weeks t o one .-nonth a f t e r i n f e c t i o n n e a r l y t o i t s o r i g i n a l l e v e l which i s reached i n l e s s than 18 months. I n c o n c l u s i o n i t should be emphasized that a r i s e i n serum antibodj^ t i t r e , e s p e c i a l l y when the acute phase serum contains evidence of antibody, should not be used as c o n c l u s i v e evidence of i n f e c t i o n f o r yellow f e v e r , or perhaps f o r any other of the group B Infectlor.;^,

page 7

EEFEEENCES 1, 2. 5. U, 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Bearcroft, W. G. C. (l956) Bugher, J . C. (l95l) Trans, roy. Soc, trop. Med. Hyg. 22; hh2 G, K. Strode, New York, p. 373 J . exp. Med. 22; 1 ^ 2 9

Yellov Fever, (195^)

Casais, J . & Brown, L , V . C, Macnamara, F. N . (1953) " " " " (1955)

B r i t . J . exp. Path. ^ , 592 Thesis for M.D. Cambridge, Eng. i n preparation.

i't a l . (1957)

P o r t e r f i e l d , J . S. (1955) Proceedings V l i t h International Congress of Comparative Pathology, Lausanne, 1955» P o r t e r f i e l d , J . S. (195^) Sabin, A. B. (19^9) Tr ans, rov. Soc, trop. Med. Hyg. 5^+

Fed. Proc. 8, UlO J . Immunol, ZL, 352

Schlesinger, K. W. et a l . (195^) Smithburn, K, C, (l9^2) " " " " (19^+5) (195^)

J , Immunol, ij^, 25 J . Immunol. 173

Immunol, J2, 376

Key facts
Document type Technical Documents
Adoption date
Source World Health Organization