Mechanisms of DDT and Permethrin Resistance in Aedes aegypti from Chiang Mai, Thailand by
La-aied Prapanthadara*#, Nongkran Promtet*, Surangchit Koottathep*, Pradya Somboon**, Wonnapa Suwonkerd***, Lynn McCarroll+ and Janet Hemingway+ *Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiangmai University, PO Box 80, Chiangmai 50200, Thailand **Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University, PO Box 80, Chiangmai 50200, Thailand ***Office of Vector Born Disease Control, Department of Communicable Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand +Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
Abstract Two strains of Aedes aegypti, one resistant to DDT but susceptible to permethrin(RdSp), and the other resistant to both DDT and permethrin (RdRp), were established in mosquitoes collected from Chiang Mai province, northern Thailand. Comparisons with a susceptible reference strain indicated that DDT resistance in both RdSp and RdRp strains was mainly due to an increase in DDTase activity. Similar moderate increases in cytochrome P450 levels were observed in the two resistant strains, hence this enzyme family may also play a role in DDT resistance. Glutathione S-transferase and esterase activities in the two resistant strains were similar and slightly higher than those of the susceptible strain, suggesting that neither enzyme group has a major role in permethrin resistance. The lack of an evident metabolic basis for the pyrethroid resistance in the RdRP strain suggests that nerve insensitivity may be present in this strain. The two mutations at residues reported to produce kdr resistance in other insects were not present, but some individuals from the permethrin resistant strain had an amino acid mutation at position 106 involving a valine to glycine mutation in the same segment 6 of domain II of the para sodium-channel gene, which may confer kdr-like resistance. Keywords: Aedes aegypti, DDT, permethrin resistance, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
# For correspondence: inhso001@chiangmai.ac.th
Dengue Bulletin – Vol 26, 2002
185
Mechanisms of DDT and Permethrin Resistance in Aedes aegypti from Chiang Mai, Thailand
Introduction Aedes aegypti, the primary vector of yellow fever, dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF), is insecticide-resistant in numerous locations throughout the world(1). DDT resistance is now widely distributed in Aedes aegypti throughout northern Thailand and it is also resistant to the pyrethroids, permethrin and deltamethrin, and the neopyrethroid etofenprox in many areas (P . Somboon, unpublished data). The major mechanisms involved in DDT resistance in insects are increased metabolism of DDT by the glutathione Stransferase (GST) enzyme family and the insensitivity to inhibition of the voltage-gated sodium channel (known as kdr)(2). As both DDT and pyrethroids act on the nervous system by modifying the gating kinetics of voltage-sensitive sodium channels, mutation in specific regions of this sodium channel can lead to binding failure with DDT and pyrethroids; therefore; cross-resistance between DDT and pyrethroids is common. In this paper, we applied biochemical and molecular assays to elucidate the resistance mechanisms in DDT-resistant and DDT/permethrin cross-resistant strains of Aedes aegypti from Northern Thailand. females had <1% mortality, whereas those exposed to 0.25% permethrin for 60 min. gave 70% mortality. Single-family selections for several generations produced two strains of Aedes aegypti, one fully resistant to DDT (RdSp) but susceptible to permethrin and the other resistant to both DDT and permethrin (RdRp). These two strains were maintained under insecticide pressure for at least 10 generations before the resistance ratios were determined and the insects were harvested for biochemical and molecular assays. Aedes aegypti Rockefeller (Rock) strain was used as a reference-susceptible for comparisons.
Bioassay and determination of LT50 For all bioassay, four replicates (25 females per replicate) of 4 and 10 different exposure time periods for 4% DDT and 0.25% permethrin respectively were undertaken. Percentage mortalities were calculated for each exposure time and the mortality data were analysed on a log-time probit mortality regression using a computer programme provided by Dr C J Schofield, WHO, Geneva.
Materials and methods Mosquitoes One-day old females, emerging from fieldcollected larvae of Aedes aegypti from Ban Pang Mai Dang, Mae Tang district, Chiang Mai province, Thailand, were exposed to 4% DDT-impregnated papers for 30 minutes in the WHO standard exposure tubes. These 186
Enzyme assays One-day old females of each strain were used for enzyme or molecular assays. Each batch was homogenized in an appropriate buffer at 4oC and the 10,000 g supernatant was then determined for enzyme activities. The GST and DDTase activity were determined using the methods of Prapanthadara et al. 1996(3). The esterase
Dengue Bulletin – Vol 26, 2002
Mechanisms of DDT and Permethrin Resistance in Aedes aegypti from Chiang Mai, Thailand
activity was measured as described by Peiris & Hemingway 1990(4) with p-nitrophenyl acetate as the substrate(4). The method for determination of insensitive acetylcholinesterase (IAChE) was as from ffrenchConstant & Bonning 1989(5). Monooxygenase activity was indirectly determined by measuring the different spectra of cytochrome P450 in microsomal fraction by using a carbon monoxide trap. Protein was assayed using the Bio-Rad protein reagent with bovine serum albumin as the standard protein. The PCR fragments of the segment 6 domain II region of the sodium channel gene were obtained as described by MartinezTorres et al. 1998(6).
Table 1: Lethal time (minutes) that gave 50% mortality (LT50) in two insecticide-selected lines of Aedes aegypti compared with the susceptible Rock strain when exposed to 4% DDT or 0.25% permethrin on impregnated filter papers in a standard WHO tarsal contact assay DDT Strains ROCK LT50 17 (1519) 390 (352427) 513 (466559) Permethrin P NS LT50 22 (21 – 24) 18.607 (17.4119.76) 534 (502 566)
χ
2
χ2 34.4
P NS
36.9
RdSp
27.9
< 0. 00 1 < 0. 00 1
5.8
NS
RdRp
24.5
2.1
NS
Results The LT50s of the RdSp and RdRp strains for DDT (Table 1) were 23- and 30-fold higher, respectively, than the LT50 of the Rock strain. Log time-probit mortality lines for both RdSp and RdRp (Figure) were not linear for DDT (Chi square analysis P<0.005), indicating that resistance had not been selected to homogeneity. In contrast, the Chi square value for permethrin in both the RdSp and RdRp strain were non-significant which suggested that resistance to this insecticide had been selected to homogeneity. One-day old adult female were used to determine all enzyme activities except cytochrome P450, where larvae were used in order to minimize pigment interference. Activities in each strain were determined using at least 20 batches of 10 mosquitoes and the mean activities calculated. Dengue Bulletin – Vol 26, 2002
Table 2: Comparison of mean GST, DDTase, cytochrome P450 and esterase activities in Aedes aegypti for the Rock, RdSp and RdRp strains Strains GST (µmole/min/mg) DDTase (nmole/mg) EST (µmole/min/mg) Cytochrome P450 (nmole/mg) Rock 0.22 0.05 RdSp 0.38± 0.09 31.03± 13.88 0.34± 0.07 0.24± 0.02 RdRp 0.37± 0.04 26.85± 5.12 0.26± 0.04 0.28± 0.04
±
3.23± 1.23 0.2± 0.03 0.07± 0.02
±
SD were
The enzyme activities are presented in Table 2. There was an ~10-fold increase in DDTase activity in the two resistant strains and a 4-fold increase in cytochrome P450 activity compared to the Rock strain. The GST and esterase activities were slightly increased. There was no change in the sensitivity of acetylcholinesterase to inhibition by bendiocarb, in either resistant 187
Mechanisms of DDT and Permethrin Resistance in Aedes aegypti from Chiang Mai, Thailand
strain compared to the Rock susceptible. The levels of increased DDTase and cytochrome P450 activities were very similar in the two resistant strains. This is in contrast to the difference in the DDT-resistance ratios. Sequencing of the S6 domain II region of the para-sodium channel gene demonstrated that the standard leucine to phenylalanine or leucine to serine mutation, which confers kdr-resistance in An. gambiae(6), was not present in either resistant strain of Aedes aegypti. However, there was a valine to glycine mutation at position 106 in this domain in the 4 RdRp individuals sequenced. This mutation was not detected in the 4 RdSp or 20 Rock individuals sequenced. Figure: Log time-probit mortality lines for the ROCK, RdSp and RdRp strains of Aedes aegypt with DDT and permethrin Permethrin 120 100 Percent mortality 80 60 40 20 ROCK R dS p R dR p
Discussion We found that DDT resistance in both RdSp and RdRp strains was due to increased DDTase activity and cytochrome P450 content whereas permethrin resistance in the RdRp strain probably involved a non-metabolic kdr mechanism. This kdr should also generate cross-resistance to DDT and would explain the greater resistance ratio to DDT in RdRp as compared to the RdSp strain. In earlier reports of DDT and pyrethroid resistance in Aedes aegypti, selection of a resistant strain with DDT generated moderate resistance to pyrethroids, whereas selection with permethrin resulted in strong resistance to both permethrin and DDT(7). Our results suggest that DDTase/cytochrome P450-based DDT-resistance does not confer crossresistance to pyrethroids. However, the kdrbased pyrethroid resistance mechanism probably increases the DDT-resistance levels. In conclusion, our study suggested that DDT resistance was due to multiple factors. DDT selection, as shown by our results and others(8), often generates GST-based metabolic resistance which does not usually confer cross-resistance to other insecticides. This should be considered before a policy of abolishing DDT use for susceptible mosquito vectors is implemented. Although the persistence of DDT residues in the environment are well documented, making it unsuitable for large-scale spraying, limited use of this insecticide as an indoor spray may still be a good method of mosquito vector control in many countries.
0
10
100 Log time (minutes)
1000
120 100 Percent mortality 80 60 40 20 0 10 100 Log time (minutes) ROCK d dP p R RS S dp RdR p
DDT
1000
188
Dengue Bulletin – Vol 26, 2002
Mechanisms of DDT and Permethrin Resistance in Aedes aegypti from Chiang Mai, Thailand
Acknowledgements We thank Dr V Ruangyuttikarn of the Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, for her advice with the cytochrome P450 assays. We also thank Mr Chumnong Kingkeaw and Mrs Darika Chittpramodya (Research
Institute for Health Sciences) for their assistance in statistical analysis. Financial support: This work was supported by a Thailand Research Fund (TRF) award to La-aided Prapanthadara, and a Wellcome Trust Tropical Development award to Janet Hemingway.
References 1. Brown AWA. Insecticide resistance in mosquitoes: a pragmatic review. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., 1986, 2: 123-140. Hassall KA, 1990. Hassall KA ed. The biochemistry and uses of pesticides: Structure, metabolism, mode of action and uses in crop protection. MacMillan. London. Prapanthadara L, Koottathep S, Promtet N, Hemingway J and Ketterman A. Purification and characterization of a major glutathione Stransferase from the mosquito Anopheles dirus (species B). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1996, 26: 277-285. Peiris HTR and Hemingway J. Temephos resistance and the associated cross-resistance spectrum in a strain of Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) from Peliyagoda, Sri Lanka. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1990, 80: 49-55. French-Constant RH and Bonning BC. Rapid microtitre plate test distinguishes insecticide resistant acetylcholinesterase genotype in the mosquitoes Anopheles albimanus, An. nigerrimus and Culex pipiens. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 1989, 3: 9-16. 7. 6. Martinez-Torres D, Chandre F, Williamson MS, Darriet F, Bergé J-B, Devonshire AL, Guillet P, Pasteur N and Pauron D. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Insect Molecular Biology, 1989, 7: 179-184. Grant DF and Matsumura F. Glutathione Stransferase 1 and 2 in susceptible and insecticide resistant Aedes aegypti. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 1989, 33: 132-143. Ranson H, Jensen B, Vulule JM, Xang X, Hemingway J and Collins FH. Identification of mutation in the voltage-gate sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2000, 30: 443-453.
2.
3.
4.
8.
5.
Dengue Bulletin – Vol 26, 2002
189